Current legal record says that J6 was insurrection.
President Trump incited this “insurrection” through coded dog whistles.
For example, “peacefully & patriotically” means “overthrow the gov with sharpened flag poles & whatever weapons you can find or make onsite.”
🧵2/7🧵
Nov 30, 2023 • 16 tweets • 6 min read
🧵TRUMP 14A UPDATE🧵
By my count, there are 22 states with 14th Amendment, Section 3 challenges to President Trump’s 2024 candidacy.
1/15
Six states — Florida, Colorado, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Michigan, and now Rhode Island — have declined to prevent President Trump from being on the ballot.
But both the challenges and the rulings are all over the place.
“The Court previously held that pursuant C.R.S. § 1-4-1204(4) the burden of proof in this matter is preponderance of the evidence. That is the
burden the Court has applied. However, the Court holds that the Petitioners have met the higher standard of clear and convincing evidence.” (Pg 60, Item 209)
Nov 18, 2023 • 25 tweets • 5 min read
Colorado Case Ruling
🧵2: Findings & Facts 🧵
Could also be called: “Rubber Stamping the J6 Report”
“The Court finds that Trump had courted these fringe figures for many years through activities such as endorsing far-right conspiracy theories like birtherism.” — re: Bannon and Stone, Pg 30, Item 80.
Nov 18, 2023 • 20 tweets • 4 min read
Colorado Case Ruling
This is NOT a win.
While President Trump will be able on the ballot, there are implications for everyone else who swore an oath and participated in J6. There may also be some Jack Smith implications.
🧵THREAD 1: Evidence Admissibility & Considerations 🧵
“The Court finds Mr. Heaphy’s testimony on this subject to be credible and holds that any perceived animus of the committee members towards Trump did not taint the conclusions of the January 6th Report in such a way that would render them unreliable.” (Pg, Item 26)
Jun 28, 2023 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
In his Capitol Times article, @PatrickByrne asserts that “In early February 2016, I met with the two FBI agents again. They brought a 3rd, for the following reason. They said that in 2008 a law was passed that made it possible for the Director of Central Intelligence…”
🧵1/12
“…to sign a piece of paper, under certain circumstances & take over the FBI. Dir. Brennan had done that on matters relating to Russia. So the DCI would be driving the FBI. They did not say exactly when Brennan had signed that…indicated it was some months earlier.”
2/12
Apr 21, 2023 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
“Can we stop talking about ‘the steal.’”
No.
Not just no, but how fucking dare you?
🧵 1/8
The Truth has cost a small amount of people more than you can ever comprehend from your opinionated place of inactive comfort.
The gov tracks us. They silence us. They abolished our rights. They tread on our freedoms, and they threaten our lives.
2/8
Mar 5, 2023 • 25 tweets • 9 min read
WAS THE CPAC PRESENTATION A MASSIVE LETDOWN?
Election activists: Take a moment, breathe, and look around.
As with @Thaleresq, all of the discussion I see is focused on who delivered the message & how it was delivered.
Based on discussions last night, @CannConActual & @realjoeoltmann saw more info & are justifiably frustrated that it wasn’t all put in the public sphere. 2/25
1 subscribed