Hunch that the reason Harris lost is the Fed meme which became and is still popular that the econ was/is shaky and did not step aside and allow the econ truth become apparent caused error in how people answered "are you better now than 4 years ago". If the Fed had been rule based with a reaction function would have raised rates Fwd Funds towards 7% by late 2021, causing a recession but then would be at 3% by QII 2024 - fiscal would still have kept NGDP in good shape.

the steps to understand the risk free curve of the US - and only the US.
1) Fed Funds = inflation + real interest rates
2) real interest rates = real GDP
3) Fed Funds = NGDP
4) standard bond math determines STIR Fed Funds then long term Fed Funds forwards are... 4) ....compounded ON Fed Funds plus drift [ volatility]
5) these forward Fed Funds are forward term structure of NGDP
6) forward term structure NGDP of overnight readily converted to semi annual yield which is the curve

The market is about to get a re- education as what the US risk free yield curve prices or how it is priced and the relationship US Treasurys have to risk free. The industry had to do this end of 1980s to 1990s then Taylor codified relationship to the Fed and then the Fed to NGDP But then from early 1990s or US Treasurys traded to risk free so all forgot the work on the curve and simply always just used US Treasurys.

Optimal for me is Harris wins handily in way impervious to SCOTUS and yet under 53% popular and only 15 or so electoral college. Trumpites go bananas scare the hell out of folks, pickup trucks in convoy rear end Prius drivers with Harris bumper stickers. Markets down 10% . Then will go max long and use leverage. Keep PHM (residential construction employment headed to 1 million) add some leverage. Back into JPM with leverage seeking 300. Long IWM. Stay away from tech which will be hammered by Harris govt.

Personal income (PI) and PCE deflator along with initial claims 8:30 today. Most will focus on deflator but as Fed is not impacting the economy but for sentiment, it is PI which counts. Exigency to see ongoing strong economy refect in both. The main issue had been pretty well the same since 2020 Covid, wartime like emergency powers handed to POTUS which included the power of the purse granted Congress.

ok think this worth a thread. let me run the machine. i am getting better and better at communicating. first rule: there is only one risk free price per maturity time. second: forward risk free is drift of Fed Funds (Itto and all that).

https://twitter.com/dbaeza13/status/1851652263250722945

if one accepts that there can only be one risk free rate per maturity - makes sense to me - then let us start with a risk free rate no one can argue with. Fed Funds.

ok @aoc I am buying how about we dine and discuss why you are a Republican with federalist values and how we take over the GOP party, purge the Taft to Trump riff raff and start the GOP II. End objective is you POTUS in 2048 and Senator 2028 then NY Governor 2034 you nailed it years ago - social democrat based on federalism is the future of the GOP or GOP dies like the Whig Party before Lincoln. you go to shed all your shallow progressive babble though sorry.

the crisis for the US is not immigration but that the current immigration levels - illegal or not - are not enough. it is not oil the world is in competition over, it is people. US must have 1.5 million plus per year immigration year on year out. the great competition will not be over goods but people/populace the influx of people required given capitalism of the US means the influx will occur. the current tussle is over who controls those people for the corrupted results of that control. Al Sharpton or Ted Cruz?

all discussions on QRA and the budget and size of the 2 year issuance or size of TBills issuance or long bonds - all of this was well known for well over a year now - even 2 years now after the increase in federal spend plateaued. this is why it is important to understand that risk free is based on seigniorage allows this what seems simple but isnt realization that there is only one risk free rate that is "cast" forward by well known mathematical functions.

the current rebound makes sense from any macro economic view. and more and more folks becoming aware that it is only macro economics now. and today seems Trump will win. that doesnt mean Harris macro is not also supportive of much higher levels in equity.
but. I am not convinced Trump is a shoe in (and this isnt my passion on what a disaster it would be for the US and the world if Trump is elected - i understand the merits of Thiel, Lighthizer, Vance understanding of macro - it is generally excellent)

the US economy and markets must have price discovery. it must have US Treasury 10 year approximate to US risk free 10 year rate. it must have an accurate US Treas curve that reflects the economy. it must have a active powerful monetary agency Fed that operates here and now right now there is none of the above. a 28 tril to be 29 tril (heck might be there now) with a 30 tril or more debt level is just crashing around without any monetary governance. and Congress has lost any control - on a whim now Congress can double debt or slam it down to 60%

it is really worth your time to read or even scan the following as this is the Fed monetary policy (ie no policy as a deliberate policy choice)
columbia.edu/~mw2230/JHole2…
levyinstitute.org/publications/g…
johnhcochrane.blogspot.com/2012/09/woodfo…
chicagofed.org/-/media/public…


or let me put it this way. if you have not studied Woodford prescription on how to execute Neo Wicksell monetary policy but charge money for folks to listen to you when you do discuss the current Federal Reserve monetary policy you are just shades away from being a fraud.

Do not mind helping out at all. And when I screw up will try you deal with it, no will deal with it, quickly and completely - but it is noticeable how many are using my stuff now - folks who derided me for years. Would appreciate being cited. Those making 6000 calls and now 7000 calls we all know came from me. I am clearly on the record and all were disdianful and dismissive but now don't mention me for obvious reasons.

The use or idea of a cycle in macro economic analysis is dependent on two factors 1) ongoing the ongoing application of the Congressional House budget rules of discretionary and mandatory spend and 2) a responsive rules based reaction function for monetary policy. The mandatory and discretionary budget rules are dismissed or waived when Congress faces a national existential threat and gives budget powers to POTUS . That was Covid

@fejau_inc @EPBResearch 1. There is no business cycle now. Like seeing a business cycle through WWII and then the decade afterwards.
2. even breaking down into components sector still table the error of #1 above - at least provides some acknowledgement of the Covid impact
3. but more important...

The Fed can raise the rate over the risk free rate only at Fed Funds instantaneous rate but can have USTreas rates below risk free rate at any maturity. So Fed yield curve control can only impose a flatter than actual yield curve, never steeper than actual. Even then, that was rarely used until January 2022 to date. And even then long maturity risk free never is a tightening or an ease.

Recommended federalist slate that will give GOP house and senate and POTUS
1) allow student loans to be discharged in bankruptcy
2) Nixon Medicare4All
3) secure border no refugees no migrants
4) increase merit immigration to 1 million year with large processing in source country 5) Fed Reserve Act redo Fed Treasury Accord II, Fed to have macro prudential powers, inflation mandate and mandate to maintain orderly US Treas market
6) Fed to present impact on Congressional spend quarterly and see Hunphrey Hawkins Act to exclude Fed from fiscal effect.

really if you sail offshore the rule (saved my ass a few times) is the time to reef sail is when you ask yourself the question; "Is it time to reef sail?" one of those serious times when the process in asking the question is the answer. 1) many folks - some how gave me a lot of grief on the public green - are now saying "gosh you were right" "great call"
2) Groucho says never join a club that wants you to be a member
3) is a major cusp point arriving with this election which will prove I am genius or a dope?

from my vantage point as if everyone started in markets about 5 years ago and have never read the literature for last 100 years and simply take the Fed meme of forward guidance as the sole source of econ and monetary analysis. never has the market been so dumb, arrogant, naive the following are a few good points to take to heart
1) markets move as per Fed guidance as it is felt the Fed will alter the economic growth as per the forward guidance
2) otherwise markets will price to recent evolution of NGDP and likely momentum of that evolution.

in various ways, this is how most understand credit to equity. here AA Merrill credit spread index to SP500 level. suggests credit is crazy tight and equity likely at peak levels. if one adjusts credit spread by volatility in underlying, SP500, as per Merton using the derived distance to default - D2D or the d2 in BSM - perception changes.

Lurking over this debate is Yarvin - a very scary person representing the greatest risk to democracy there is now. And Vance is his guy ad well ad Thiel. This alone is enough to back this cesspool of the Demicratic Party so the GOP can rebuild after defeat. Evelyn Waugh pointed out the most dangerous folks are those who convert to Catholicism ad adults. The other dangerous crew are pragmatic organizational focused cynics. Vance is combination of them both.