An old entomologist is out walking one day. He passes by a record store.

In the window he sees an LP for sale titled 'Wasp Sounds of South America'.

"Blimey" he thinks, "that looks great!" And he enters the shop... He goes up to the young man behind the counter and asks "That LP in the window - 'Wasp Sounds of South America', can I please have a listen to it?"

The young assistant says "Yes, I'll just put it on for you now."...

TRIGGER WARNING: Nuance

Having looked at a lot of the reporting and inquiries into the grooming scandal, I think there are several things that can be said for certain.

1. There wasn’t much of a ‘complete’ government cover-up, mainly just government inaction. However, the 2020 Home Office report DOES seem to have been an exercise in downplaying the ethnicity of the perpetrators. Priti Patel did somewhat acknowledge that at the time, which is very odd.

There's a (possibly apocryphal) story about the 1960 presidential debate between Nixon and JFK.

People listening on the radio believed Nixon had won the debate, as they couldn't see him sweating.

People watching on TV thought JFK was the winner.

https://twitter.com/RitaPanahi/status/1854097929281401018

This election shows that history repeats itself.

People (voters and the political commentators) who solely watch the legacy TV news channels would have though Harris was a shoe-in for the Presidency.

Here is a story.

A tale about one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

That movie stars Eddie Izzard. It's called 'Dr Jekyll'. It is shit.

Everything about it is bad. The story, the pacing, the setting, the acting...

But especially Izzard.

Here's a sample piece of dialogue. The story is incredibly poor. They've taken the Dr Jekyll story and put it in the modern day and somehow stripped it of any element of horror.

We're also supposed to believe Izzard's character is a woman.

Not a transwoman.

A real woman. 🤣

Here's some bad acting.

The moment the Olympics died. Jeers and chanting from the crowd before, during and after the match, all directed at the male Imane Khelif.

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY PROTESTS: A THREAD ON WHO IS DIRECTING THEM

As you've seen, there have been many protests on US universities over the past few weeks.

Take a good look at this image.

Who organises and funds these groups will both shock and surprise you. 1/24 This protest follows the same modus operandi as others in the recent past, both in America and across the globe.

Here are some examples, look the images carefully.

A) Black Lives Matter protests

2/24

The whole concept of 'Intersectionality' has been totally distorted and corrupted.

It was a useful idea, in that pockets of discrimination exist and should be acknowledged. 1/6

https://twitter.com/BethOttawa/status/1658924052847685633

For example, if a company owner doesn't like Asian women, specifically.

They can claim that by employing men of other races they aren't being sexist.

They can also claim that by employing Asian men they aren't being racist.

Yet they are discriminating against Asian women. 2/6

I have a story for the people out there who assume that ALL transwomen are the same. It might make you think twice about your assumptions... There is very clear and credible evidence of a transwoman, born in 1893, who was very constricted in expressing their gender identity fully, causing them immense distress.

I think I can explain how the police force are so captured by the LGBTQIIA2+++ gender ideologues.

So if you'll bear with me, I'd like to explain. So up until the 90s the police were pretty heavy handed when it came to, well, policing. I'm generalising here, but a lot of the police force were pretty intolerant people when it came to issues of race and sexuality.

One particular strand of the gender debate boils down to a group of people who believe that some men will dress as women for sexual gratification reasons, arguing against another group who don't believe that's ever possibly happened or could happen.

Which group is accurate? Another strand boils down to a group of people who believe that young kids shouldn't be given drugs that have disastrous long term health consequences, arguing against another group who believe it should be made easier for those kids to take those drugs.

Who sounds most caring?