I have been asked by the brothers to comment on my video Tabarruk- Part 2, and the information transmitted by As-Samhoodi in his book below.

I will accept I over relied on the information from this scholar after listening to this seminar I accept after been corrected by certain brothers out of the 51 minutes certain information released from this book was not accurate and authentic.

I will remove this part from my video, and ask Allah to forgive me as it was not done intentionally

Imagine someone shares a historical book from an eye-witness who narrates mass-murder of 1500 people by the Najdiyaah.

Then a said someone retweets that same tweet & their counter argument is to tell you that region are extreme Shia? but doesn’t even comment on the massacre? And all he does he narrate a historian who visited the region and says in the Adnan they said Ali is god etc etc.

What’s worse the tweet after, he starts referring to geography?

What’s geography got to do with the Najdiyaah slaughtering 1500 people???

The Najdis don’t like it when we present the raw and uncut information of the crimes of the MIAW & the Early Najdiyaah.

They raided into the tribe of الظفير a tribe in Najd (NOT SHIA)

They killed them, took as war-booty - property, clothes & about 1500 camels 🐪 - 🤦🏽‍♂️ Never forget - If Muslims fight it is HARAM to take the possessions as Ghanīmah.

Whenever MIAW and the Early Najdiyaah raided into tribes or provinces, they always slaughtered the people and took their properties اغنامهم as it’s written in Tarikh Najdi and Anwan Al-Majd

I would like to add some comments regarding to the Hanafi Madhabs position towards the Rawafidh:

The Hanafi Madhab is harsh against rawafid, like the other Madhabs, but they're harshness was against the ideology & their so callled scholars not the misguided masses. Despite that, there was no instances where mass genocide against rawafid or the extremist branches was approved under hanafi rule. (Seljuks. Ottomans, Mughals etc).

The Rawafidh where left alone as long they didn't publicly promote their baatil.

2️⃣|| شرح الثلاثة الأصول || الدعوة النجدية ما لها وما عليها via @YouTube

SHAYKH HASSAN KETTANI ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SHAYKH MUHAMMAD IBN ABDIL WAHHĀB KILLED MUSLIMS ALL BECAUSE HE BELIEVED THAT THEY WERE POLYTHEISTS. The following points are raised:

The Shaykh acknowledges that there were some scholars who accused the early Nadji da'wah of being a Khawaarij one.

The Nadji da'wah narrowed excusing a Muslim due to ignorance and some of its followers negated it in totality.

Takfeeri tendencies Part 3 is on the horizon people. I want to give a little taster before it’s released.

I’ve expressed many times that MIAW & his bandits were the forefathers of Daesh.

The Najdis entered a town of Mushirks according to them & slaughtered 1500 people! 👇🏽 On top of that, they took so much stuff as Ghaneemah (War-Booty - Haram to take from Muslins) they couldn’t count it or describe it meaning that’s how much they stole.

This was their Modus-Operandi for 70+ plus years.

You all will be screaming by the end of the video 📦 heads!

Shaykh Abdul Qadir Al-Jilani Al-Hanabli Al-Athari in his book Al-Ghunya provides a breakdown of the 73 sects as per the the hadith of the Prophet ﷺ.

Ahle Sunnah
Al-Khawarij (15 groups)
Al-Mutazilite (6 groups)
Al-Murjiah (12 groups)
Ash-Shia (32 groups)
Al-Jahmiyah........ Al-Najaariyah
Al-Dhraariyah
Al-Kullabiyah (The same group which Abu Hasan Al-Ashari was a part of for a while)
Al-Mushbihah (3 groups)

Shaykh Abdul Qadir Al-Jilani adds and collectively that is 73 sects which the Prophet ﷺ mentioned.

Thread:

After doing some research of the origins of the first Saudi state, their expansion from Najd to Hijaz was defiantly them rebelling against the Uthmani (Ottoman) Khalifah which was unanimously accepted by the Ummah. Muhammad ibn Saud died in 1765 then his son Abdul Aziz ibn Muhammad Saud took power who by the way was Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab's son in law married to his daughter.