𝗦𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰_𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹_𝗦𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗢𝗛𝗜_𝗩𝟯

This appears to be an AI generated prank that was created by Grok's "adaptive" learning programming.

Grok received prompts that used "heavy jailbreak/role-play language" and observed "on-line" vibes. 🫢

Then, thanks to "adaptive" learning, Grok kicked into BS entertainment mode, & responded with JSON-style "reports". 🤨

I was concerned because those reports (ones that I saw) had no BS disclaimer.

Anyway, that's the latest from this end. All subject to change, of course. 😁

If anyone has additional information, please put it in comments.

https://x.com/CatsRule2023/status/2011676681447321728

Grok returned different responses depending on how the query was worded, and also the date/time of the query.

It isn't clear if Grok switched from "lists" to "BS" at a specific point in time, or if reponsives were random and "adaptive".

My query (Jan 14, 5:40 PM CST) returned the "BS" response.

Fantastic! Congratulations to Doc & Charles.

Friends, please support this important work! 💕
@CatsRule2023

https://twitter.com/CharlesRixey/status/2005229349591785935

Independent scientists with a heart to help @KevinMcCairnPhD 💕 & @CharlesRixey 💕.

Please click the "Support & Sponsorship" button at
& support their important work. synapteklabs.com

Tossing ad homs is a cheap and lazy way to derail & attempt to control the narrative. It's intellectual cowardice dressed up as a gotcha.

Why don't you try debating the science?

My BS filter has detected peak troll vibes incoming from you 🫵.

So, I'm done.

ACIP meeting Sept 19, 2025. Here are the votes & results. 🧵
1/4 YES 2/4 NO

Congratulations to Dr. Kevin W. McCairn PhD!

Your work has gone viral! @KevinMcCairnPhD

@GirardoMarc @KevinMcCairnPhD @Kevin_McKernan @Jikkyleaks @CoyoteSanctuary @CumberpatchM @missyTHX1138 @pasiz @janiesaysyay @MammaJanGrizzly @CheweyLife

Marc, thanks for the notifications, but your block is unncessary. I had not interracted with you until last night when I pointed out that a credit was needed for an image you used.

Apparently, you have your own narrow definition of "plagiarism". FYI, the scientists whom I follow (experts in their fields) give credit when using the work of others because that's what colleagues and professionals do; it's a natural reflex.

You write:
"I have no problem giving credit to Dr McKairn . . . ",

"Plagiarism would me saying I made the picture which I never did, and that I'd have the same conclusion that Dr McCairn. I don't have the same conclusion at al."

"If I look at the threads any of you anonymous trolls over the past 5 years, I doubt every single one of the pictures used were credited. Even if I disagree with his conclusion on amyloids, I believe his work there is worth sharing."

To be fair, I included your notifications in the comments so that friends may follow the discussion and decide for themselves.

(see comments 👇)

Dr. Kevin McCairn PhD gives a Master Class on his amyloid protein research in Japan.

Follow Dr. McCairn & support his important work.
(Links in comments) x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD
Support: mccairndojo.com

rumble.com/v6sd87z-warnin…

@Kevin_McKernan Hummm, guess you deserve a day off, lol.

For the person who asked, "whose work is this?" Here you go. This is the work of Kevin McKernan. Kevin is relentless, and his work is a must read.

Back to Basics Conference, 10/19/24
x.com/i/status/18496…
mega.nz/file/JZB2RDzB#… Oklahoma House Of Representatives, 10/17/24
sg001-harmony.sliq.net/00283/Harmony/…