There are two types of biological males who get into women's athletics. The first is mediocre/failed competitors in men's leagues who see an easy way to score success, fame, money, and scholarships. /1

https://twitter.com/glaad/status/1649085247085072387

The second are autogynephiles--the inconvenient truth of the trans movement--extreme misogynists who get a sexual thrill from humiliating women, embarrassing women, or being in women-only spaces. They've completely taken over the "trans movement," and GLAAD, it would appear. /2

The gay left aren’t sending their best. Re: “Trump argued for workplace discrimination against LGBTs 🥴” No, queens, here’s what happened: THREAD A case was brought to the DOJ about a man being fired because he’s gay. The DOJ is a part of the Executive Branch of gov. As I’m sure all you lefty geniuses realize, the Executive Branch enforces laws. It doesn’t make laws or interpret laws, that’s the job of the other 2 branches

But on a serious note, it's no secret that the alphabet coalition despises white gay men--the very group that founded the gay rights movement--because as LGBTQ+ has been taken over by Marxism, it views "white" and "male" privilege as trumping "gay." Yesterday, when I posted a... tweet that sounded racist to them (but everything does), they saw a "gotcha" moment, believing they'd stumbled upon one of these naturally racist white gays that they're always banging on about. The truth is, these people had ever heard of me and weren't aware that my whole deal-

THIS IS HUGE: Facebook just admitted in a federal document that they are, indeed, a publisher, not a platform, and they are demanding First Amendment protections from Laura Loomer's defamation lawsuit. This means, Mark Zuckerberg lied to Congress. docs.reclaimthenet.org/Loomer-v-Faceb… In the motion, Facebook says, "to the extent Ms. Loomer’s claim targets Facebook’s decision to deactivate her accounts, it is also deficient. Under well-established law, neither Facebook nor any other publisher can be liable for failing to publish someone else’s message."

She’s lying. Look at the smile she gives, meant to manipulate the person you’re lying to. It communicates “you believe me, right?” I used to write for NYT, every single word added and cut by an editor MUST be approved by the journalist. It was a meticulous, irritating process.

https://twitter.com/mattwolking/status/1174005174832177152

I’d be on the phone with an editor at 11pm re: a fluff piece where he wanted to change an adjective I used. Another example, “can we remove the word ‘historic?’ Although the building’s 200 years old it’s not on the national historic registry.” She’s lying. It was intentional.

Hello America. I’m a mostly rational, gay man and journalist from a working class background who lives in New York City and formerly worked for leftwing media. Let me explain a bit what’s going on here with this very upset white liberal. THREAD

https://twitter.com/stirlingmorris/status/1162136460952293377

Firstly, you are Twitter verified for no apparent reason, with only 1,000 followers, no bylines or actual cultural relevancy. So you either sucked a dick or paid someone for that check mark. Nice work.

Exclusive: @JussieSmollett has employed PR Firm Sunshine Sachs to defend him. This is the same firm used by Harvey Weinstein to deflect his attacks. Among other horrors. See the thread for links. Why would a hate crime victim need such heavy PR?

https://twitter.com/robelgasabc7/status/1095423444437663745

people.com/movies/harvey-…

The dozens of police officers at the event last night were not there to protect Antifa scum from scary republicans. They were there to protect the Republicans, who were peacefully assembling to hear a speaker, from the violent democrat mob 1/ We were locked inside the building for a half hour after the speech ended so the cops could devise a safe way for us to leave. During the speech, the violent democrat mob was banging on the door trying to break in. 2/