How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1608549206570184704I don't think the crucial factor is academics providing expensive educations to rich east coast kids, though. Rather, union leaders & academic experts on labor relations are psychologically specialized in ways that lead them to think about the same issues in different ways. (2/x)
https://twitter.com/KumarsSalehi/status/1549209449885159424Human social groups have hierarchies (e.g., those inherent in any form of leadership) and make ingroup/outgroup distinctions, but right-wing politics aestheticizes and absolutizes these things beyond any real functionality. (2/n)
https://twitter.com/nils_gilman/status/1538731750133833728One part of this asymmetry is that -- level of radicalization aside -- different sorts of people sort into left and right spaces, e.g., (2/n) psyarxiv.com/xhvyj
https://twitter.com/Edsall/status/1442018992265175041"Experts" have been looking for left-wing authoritarianism since the 1950s. If you use std authoritarianism measures or ones that are ideologically-neutral (per Rokeach), LWA is relatively hard to find in WEIRD countries. (2/n)
https://twitter.com/ryanburge/status/1440498555152572420But the fact that conservative white Catholics are as hostile to immigration and less opposed to abortion than conservative white evangelicals also suggests something ironic (but not entirely unexpected) about the conservative Catholic political project in the US. (2/n)
https://twitter.com/krishashok/status/1434507883954147328Those of us who are high in political engagement spend a lot of time talking to (or at) each other, and we lose all sense of what outliers were are in terms of how much more time we spend thinking about politics and how much more central politics is to our identities. (2/n)
https://twitter.com/mcpli/status/1429443477134315522Rather, ideological labels and the motives behind them to some extent acquire different socially-constructed content on the basis of group/party conflicts, elite actions, and historical features unique to specific societies. (2/n)
https://twitter.com/robfordmancs/status/1402965575584911363In this vein, we know from work by Groenendyk et al (2020) that priming ideological norms can increase expression of ideologically-constrained opinions. We might very reasonably assume that the social networks of the engaged do a lot of this. (2/n) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
https://twitter.com/laseptiemewilay/status/1387603421738545154The notion of conservatism as cautious, limit-seeking temperament is certainly consistent with at least one stream of research on personality and politics, e.g., (2/n) annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114…
https://twitter.com/ChrisPolPsych/status/1387513473345626112In this vein, the Kalla & English (2021) study was well done and comports with prior studies. I don't dispute it & I think it is relevant for communications about *some* things. But many issues require you to confront race, and you can't message your way out of doing so. (2/n)
https://twitter.com/Noahpinion/status/1384951416540835842By 'ideological framework,' I have in mind the conservative elite consensus behind Reaganism: laissez faire economics, muscular foreign policy, and traditional values. (2/n)
https://twitter.com/ChrisPolPsych/status/1378007214737121283Racial resentment, white respondents only: (2/n)