Popular brand @/slightlyfurry is protecting Furry Raiders in their group. The "proudly queer" owners know hate group members are inside but won't protect the community. Do they avoid drawing lines because one of their owners is involved with zoophilia?

Proof in thread.
🧵1/20 A good faith tipper showed proof of Furry Raiders activity to several group mods, including @/martinisoft, owner of @/slightlyfurry. They viewed it privately and had a chance to act, but they turned a blind eye. They can't excuse it as "we didn't know" after they saw it.

(1) Incident response update from @megaplexcon. Bless them for being beyond helpful. Response like this looks overdue in the fandom, especially after exposure of scandals like...

https://twitter.com/MegaplexCon/status/1425966589241970693?s=19

(2) The 2018 zoosadist ring. It still has members being con staffers. This story shows @dogpatchpress trying to get a different con to listen about ring member Tane, but the con chair said "none of your business" and blocked him for trying.
dogpatch.press/2019/09/18/inv…

1) 28 TWEET THREAD. We're helping tippers put a problem on record. It starts with convicted animal rapist @cupidthedeer. His crime blew open the ring with @KeroTheWolf. Now there's questionable trust for events and groups who host the problem. en.wikifur.com/wiki/Cupid_the… #animalabuse 2) "Questionable trust" falls short of naming the problem. It's not innocent people reacting to crime after finding out. It's circles of fellow travelers who enable each other. Some furry fandom events and groups are tacitly and corruptly run by and for zoophiles. #corruption

@grizdoginthefur is an alt-right troll who was deeply involved in trying to sabotage @furfest by egging on those who tried to bring Milo. He also staffs cons like Denfur. He pins a fake anti-Trump message to distract from his trojan horse troll activity. Don't buy it.

https://twitter.com/Forzaroo/status/1204796647890411522

From the embedded tweet: member list of Milo's MFF chat