How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/DofConsequence/status/16263025021770547212/ I really wish I had been wrong about Russia's goals. Also, I'm not saying that Russia will succeed. It looks like they'll try, though, even though their plan was uncovered.
https://twitter.com/radleybalko/status/16191658684701900802/5 Many people assume that combat veterans shouldn't go into law enforcement, because they'll be quicker to shoot. That's rubbish. Being in the military teaches you when NOT to shoot. See the difference π? (1st pic is police in Ferguson, 2nd is 82nd airborne in Afghanistan)
https://twitter.com/no_mo_woe/status/16172932628295270402/ Most of the arguments I see against providing advanced weapons boil down to two things: Logistics (including maintenance) and training. I do not think either of those arguments carry any weight.
https://twitter.com/DofConsequence/status/16169223423361105942/ At face value, Troits'ke seems like a better objective than Svatove, because it would cut the GLOC to Starobil's'k and, as a side effect, Svatove. I think πΊπ¦would have loved to do it, but there a few reasons it wasn't feasible.
https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/status/16165047053870530572/ Let's say Ukraine wins an overwhelming victory on the battlefield, Russia flees Crimea, and Ukraine is liberated. Does that end the war? No.
https://twitter.com/mccaffreyr3/status/16162276808187166722/6 He recognized what should have been obvious to everyone: A limited response caused by fear of escalation was a terrible mistake. And he's been proven right. Sure, Ukraine is winning the war, but at what cost? "Well over" 100k casualties according to Gen. Milley.
https://twitter.com/officejjsmart/status/15814277284225597452/ When it comes to potential nuclear war, nuclear powers have a problem: All the available evidence indicates that nobody wants to do it--even when their nuclear doctrine says they should, and even when failing to act could destroy their country. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nβ¦
https://twitter.com/Kartinamaslom5/status/1580919587096662017?t=bueeX6q89KfqcVcwDtpkFA&s=192/4 It's retweeted in English by @CasualArtyFan, and it confirms the Google auto translation of the original tweet. This is also TRUE (as far as I know), and the source is linked.
https://twitter.com/CasualArtyFan/status/1580924777182547970?t=bueeX6q89KfqcVcwDtpkFA&s=19
https://twitter.com/michaeldweiss/status/1580709963327905792And yes, I know that many of the terminals were purchased by the Pentagon, but the article says the letter was responding to a request from Ukraine for more. SpaceX directed them to the Pentagon. Based on this, there doesn't seem to be anything nefarious going on.
https://twitter.com/DarthPutinKGB/status/15794360147201228812/3 I said it at least as early as April...
https://twitter.com/StellarEQ1/status/1518716970530660353?t=hj52JYdzEn9AynSpAygScA&s=19
https://twitter.com/CedricMas/status/15773269964298895362/ To clarify for those who didn't read my earlier tweets about opsec, I think much of the footage we see--even footage that appears to be random, taken by individual soldiers--is filmed by media specialists, sent to a special unit for screening, then...
https://twitter.com/AndrewPerpetua/status/1572090026296758274They say in war that the other side gets a vote. However, based on public info, I don't see a way for π·πΊ to hold west of Severodonetsk. They might do something like this π. Others have pointed out that's not very defensible terrain. True. But π·πΊ doesn't have many good options.