Sound studies folk will be unsurprised to know that I have some thoughts (and feelings) abt Christoph Cox's 'response' to myself and @annie_goh, the caveat being that I haven’t had chance to read it as closely as I’d like. However, I thought I’d share some initial responses. Cox’s response seems to be predicated on ‘reading through’ both the realist/correlationist and enlightenment/postmodernism binary. This feels pertinent given that I sought to raise how unacknowledged perceptual schema shape what we see and don’t see, what we hear and don’t hear.