Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Jack Fitzgerald | @jackfitzgerald.bsky.social Profile picture
Jack Fitzgerald | @jackfitzgerald.bsky.social
@FitzgeraldJack_
Economics PhD candidate @VUamsterdam and @ResearchTI. Working on applied econometrics, replication, + economics of science. @UvA_Amsterdam, @FloridaState alum.
Dec 20, 2024 • 10 tweets • 4 min read
A new working paper for holiday reading! @peder_isager and I provide an introduction to three-sided testing, a framework for testing an estimate's practical significance. We offer a tutorial, Shiny app, + commands/code in #Rstats, Jamovi, and #Stata (🔗 below!) 1/9

#EconTwitter Image Equivalence testing lets us test whether estimates are stat. sig. bounded beneath practically negligible effect size Δ (e.g., pink estimate). But estimates can be both stat. sig. diff. from zero and stat. sig. bounded beneath Δ. 2/9 Pink estimate is statistically significantly bounded between the delta bounds. Blue estimate is statistically significantly bounded above the upper delta bound. The confidence interval of the orange estimate intersects one of the delta bound, but does not cross zero.
Nov 18, 2024 • 21 tweets • 6 min read
Do real stakes/incentives matter in experiments? Recent studies say they don’t. My new paper shows that these studies’ results — and those of most hypothetical bias experiments — are uninformative when we care about experimental treatment effects. 1/x
🔗: papers.tinbergen.nl/24070.pdfImage Historically, experimental economists virtually always tied experimental choices to real stakes/payoffs to improve generalizability. That’s changing: many economists now use hypothetical stakes in online experiments + large-scale survey experiments. 2/x
Oct 10, 2024 • 33 tweets • 10 min read
🧵 on my replication of Moscona & Sastry (2023, QJE).
TL;DR: MS23 proxy 'innovation exposure' with a measure of heat. Using direct innovation measures from the paper’s own data decreases headline estimates of innovation’s mitigatory impact on climate change damage by >99.8%. 1/x Moscona & Sastry (2023) reach two findings. First, climate change spurs agricultural innovation. Crops with croplands more exposed to extreme heat see increases in variety development and climate change-related patenting. 2/x
academic.oup.com/qje/article/13…
Oct 2, 2024 • 25 tweets • 8 min read
My paper is out in @PNASNews! I replicate a paper on the impact of COVID vaccine mandates on vaccine uptake. Removing a single bad control variable sign-flips several of the paper’s headline results. The reply’s findings are also not robust. 1/x
pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn… @PNASNews Rains & Richards (2024) — henceforth RR24 — reach two findings. First, RR24 claim that difference-in-differences estimates show that US state COVID vaccine mandates had imprecise impacts on COVID vaccine uptake. 2/x
pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
Jul 22, 2024 • 16 tweets • 5 min read
🚨 WP alert! 🚨 I design equivalence tests for running variable (RV) manipulation in regression discontinuity (RDD), show that serious RV manipulation can't be ruled out in lots of published RDD research, and offer the lddtest command in Stata/R. 1/x

🔗: hdl.handle.net/10419/300277Image Credible RDD estimation relies on the assumption that agents can’t endogenously sort their RVs to opt themselves into or out of treatment. If they can, then RDD estimates are confounded: agents who manipulate RVs are likely different in important ways from agents who don't. 2/x