Ancient Mysteries’ Researcher🗿Inventor of The Natron Theory🧂Solved the artificial granite problem 🪨 with caveman materials only. Author: The Natron Theory 📔
Jun 20 • 10 tweets • 6 min read
1. Hi Newcomers, let me introduce the very first ancient artificial stone I discovered in detail—what I call Inka Stone, or Neopolymer (a Neolithic geopolymer). 🧵
The recipe is incredibly complex—it involves mixing two components, and since two is more than one, obviously a caveman couldn’t have made this, right? I mean, they couldn’t even count to two.
And anyway, there’s no point in trying the experiment, because the result isn’t stone—it’s just a handful of mud.
Well, no. Definitely not.2. So, it all started when I etched a piece of granite using molten natron in a grill chimney.
I couldn’t believe my eyes when it actually worked, because granite is supposed to be one of the hardest materials on Earth, practically indestructible—or so the myth goes.
When I announced this to the world around 2023, even I didn’t understand how it was possible. But now I do:
In plain English: molten natron breaks down the quartz in the granite and turns into waterglass in a bubbling frenzy. That gives us our first component for artificial stone—waterglass.
I've actually made a webpage full of pictures and videos about this. Check it out before asking questions: natrontheory.com
Jun 19 • 7 tweets • 6 min read
1. Suddenly I gained another 500 followers, so for their sake, I'll briefly summarize what the game is all about here. It seems we're going to rewrite the first few chapters of human history. 🧵
What started as "let's figure out how the unfinished obelisk in Aswan was made" has evolved in a direction where we can now confidently say the past didn't happen the way we thought.
Our ancestors were apparently capable of chemically altering stones, dissolving them, and then reassembling them. The evidence for this is that countless others besides me have done this, and it works, and it’s not even hard to do.
Unfortunately, there's no need for UFOs or ancient advanced civilizations to transport stone blocks of, say, 20-25 tons, or God forbid, 1000 tons. They weren’t hauling the stone blocks around, but just the raw material. In buckets.
The megalithic structures are masonry works, just that the mortar is a completely different material than what we use today. What could it be?2. First Act
When I started to decipher the secret of the Aswan unfinished obelisk, I naturally had no intention of rewriting the early history of humanity. This realization came later.
The mystery of the unfinished obelisk lies in the mysterious scoop marks, approximately 50x50 cm indentations, which look as though someone gouged out the granite with a giant ice cream scoop.
The official explanation is completely wrong, I won’t even go into that, it’s nonsense.
However, my experiment was successful, and indeed, I was able to chemically etch the supposedly indestructible granite with simple tools in my own backyard. All it took was a grill chimney starter, some charcoal, and - natron.
As it turned out, modern humanity of course knows that molten natron dissolves granite, or more accurately quartz, and this is used in several industrial processes, from pottery (cracking glazes) to recycling rare metals (liberating metals from circuit boards).
It's just that archaeologists didn’t know.
Which I have no problem with, other than the fact that they know now but still ignore the facts.
Jun 15 • 8 tweets • 5 min read
1. Tatiana posted a great photo yesterday of some walls beneath the Athenian Acropolis. That image raised a bunch of questions about nubs, so I figured I’d sum up what the Natron Theory predicts about them.
And yes, I’m deliberately using the word “predicts,” because neither I nor anyone else has done a thorough mass spectrometry analysis of that wall—let alone dismantled it or looked behind it.
So while logic strongly suggests what I’m about to say is true, it’s still just logic. And life isn’t always logical.
So let’s dive in! 🧵
2. What jumps out right away about this section of the wall is that it’s not made with polygonal masonry—it’s built from uniform limestone blocks.
I marked the edges of the narrower stones with a red dashed line: if those weren’t cast in a mold, then nothing ever was. Their height isn’t just close—it’s identical. Same with their width.
Curiously, though, the nubs are in the “wrong place”—not at the bottom of the stones. So they definitely weren’t for draining excess water.
But hang on—
Jun 10 • 20 tweets • 10 min read
1. I'm slowly starting to understand what might have happened in Peru.
A long and important 🧵
Anyone remember when I was scouring satellite images looking for natron springs all over the world?
I found quite a few—like near the Barabar caves in India, by Göbekli Tepe, and other places.
And I also found a huge natural salt source in Peru, right at the epicenter of all known megalithic remains.
Not a bad hunch—but still...2. This place is the ancient Peruvian salt evaporation site, Salinas de Maras, where massive amounts of salt have been produced for thousands of years.
When I identified this place as a natron source, I didn’t yet realize that where there’s calcium, there’s no natron.
I never claimed to be a real scientist—this is pseudoscience, and massive blunders like this come with the territory.
Jun 3 • 12 tweets • 7 min read
1. Here’s an overhead view of the Great Pyramid of Giza.
I used this image in my newly published book to prove a point. Then along came a so-called "real archaeologist," trying to make a fool of me. "Real archaeologists" come and go—I don’t even remember his name.
But a few things have happened since then. Let’s see who was right.
Let’s zoom in!2. In this image, we can spot all kinds of interesting details—from the impressions spanning multiple stones (top right, orange fram) to the skillful use of a square drill (bottom left, green frame).
In my book, I wrote that these are clear signs that these stones are artificial. To which the real archaeologist responded: “So many people have been on top of the pyramid, entire TV crews—it’s obvious they chiseled out those square holes.”
Alright, fine. Let’s say you’re right. (You’re not—we’ll see in a moment.)
But who in their right mind carves indentations into stone?
And are we seriously supposed to believe that TV crews carry precision square drills? I had no idea. I always thought they just used dowels and screws to mount things.
Jun 3 • 12 tweets • 7 min read
1. Here’s an overhead view of the Great Pyramid of Giza 🧵
I used this image in my newly published book to prove a point. Then along came a so-called "real archaeologist," trying to make a fool of me. "Real archaeologists" come and go—I don’t even remember his name.
But a few things have happened since then. Let’s see who was right.
Let’s zoom in!2. In this image, we can spot all kinds of interesting details—from the impressions spanning multiple stones (top right, orange fram) to the skillful use of a square drill (bottom left, green frame).
In my book, I wrote that these are clear signs that these stones are artificial. To which the real archaeologist responded: “So many people have been on top of the pyramid, entire TV crews—it’s obvious they chiseled out those square holes.”
Alright, fine. Let’s say you’re right. (You’re not—we’ll see in a moment.)
But who in their right mind carves indentations into stone?
And are we seriously supposed to believe that TV crews carry precision square drills? I had no idea. I always thought they just used dowels and screws to mount things.
May 29 • 9 tweets • 4 min read
1. And from now on I’m the happy and (il)legal owner of a piece of limestone from The Great Pyramid of Giza!
Thanks to @GodPlaysCards who sent it to me.
🧵 2. Why is this important? Because he collected it at the top (‼️) of the great pyramid some 20 years ago
AAAAAAND!
there is a slight chance that this piece is from a casing stone!
God knows- and mass spectrometry 🤣
May 27 • 13 tweets • 6 min read
1. How did I invent the time machine? 🧵
When I first made artificial (okay, fake) granite using my own recipe (see below), it absolutely refused to become waterproof. And I was on a tight deadline—I'd written a book that included the recipe, and it was about to be published.
But this stuff kept crumbling just from regular tap water. Some “granite,” huh?
Sure, I knew it would eventually become weatherproof over time, but how much time? And who has time to wait?
So, reluctantly, I had to invent a time machine—just to have a fake granite that could withstand the elements before the book came out. I put my stone inside, sent it into the future, and ta-da—it came out fully weatherproof.
What kind of time machine, you ask? Not that kind. You wouldn't fit inside.
2. So what are we really talking about?
The stone's recipe is dead simple. To make artificial granite my way, you take real, gazillion-year-old natural granite rubble and glue it back together with fake quartz—amorphous SiO₂ (basically glass).
And you make that fake quartz from waterglass (sodium silicate), adding any strong liquor like whiskey 🥃
That separates the waterglass into amorphous silica gel and potassium hydroxide water, which drips out of the stone. (The role of the nubs.)
May 22 • 15 tweets • 8 min read
1. "This stone here can’t possibly be cast. It's carved, 100%" 🧵
Why?
"Well, look at that white line in it, the quartz vein. That white stripe can only form under immense pressure and heat. This is a carved Egyptian tablet, period."
But how true is that, really?
There’s probably some truth to it, but could it just be another myth, like the one about granite being indestructible—immune to both acids and alkalis?
Spoiler alert: while I’ve traced the origin of this myth, I can’t claim I’ve cracked this one (unlike with granite, which I can break down).
I can't grow quartz veins and certainly can't check the results simply because I don't live for thousands of years. Do you?
Here’s everything I found out about the roots of the story. It’s pretty fascinating!2. To understand the tale, we need to rewind about 80–90 years—to the era of vacuum tubes.
Back then, these tubes were cutting-edge tech, used for just about everything, much like semiconductors today.
(Because guess what? They're semiconductors too.)
And if you’ve ever wondered where the term “software bug” comes from, picture an actual insect getting fried on a circuit because of the heat from those vacuum tubes—short-circuiting the whole thing.
May 20 • 10 tweets • 6 min read
1. What if I told you I know exactly how this stone pattern was made—and why? 🧵
This is a detail from the roof of the Hathor Temple in Dendera. That roof practically screams it was made using cast artificial limestone. And this elegant pattern?
Let me walk you through it step by step, and you’ll see the "why".
How can I be so self confident? Ughh!
Well, I usually do what I preach. At the end of this thread I’ll show you how I cast a similar pattern in my own backyard from some non-existent, impossible artificial limestone slurry.
Let’s dive in!2. For the longest time, I didn’t realize that this pattern wasn’t made for aesthetics—it came about because something had to be cast around and then patched up later.
There was something in that enclosed area (marked by a brown square) that couldn’t be removed until all the surrounding stone had set.
Maybe a post for a canopy to shade the fresh casts from the scorching sun? Who knows. But the casting sequence? That we can figure out.
Besides, it can’t be for decoration, because this pattern is in the middle layer of a sandwich-structured roof. If locals hadn’t stripped the top layer for building stone, no living soul would’ve ever seen this “aesthetic miracle.”
So, the post stood there—immovable for the time being—and had to be cast around.
May 15 • 14 tweets • 8 min read
1. Cast, Not Carved 🧵
Here’s the theory in a nutshell—the one I’ll be using to explain all those ridiculous questions "influencers" keep asking about ancient stones.
"How did our ancestors lift 60-ton stones?"
Well they clearly did not, or if they did, they did it in buckets! 🪣🪣🪣🪣
How did they carve the stones to fit together so precisely?
Again, they didn’t—they poured one next to the other.
Why are all the stones different? Why isn’t there a single one that’s the same?
Because they poured them straight into the wall, not into molds—so they didn’t have to lift them later.
Where are the molds then?
Nowhere. They didn’t need them. A few wooden planks or a bit of animal hide was enough.
And I’m not just talking hot air—I actually pour stones: Inca stone, sandstone, granite, limestone.
Alright, now let’s get to the examples.2. Bench in Cusco
This bench is found on a street in Cusco, and what’s interesting is that it’s not a bench, but a wall slightly dislodged by an earthquake, showing how precisely they “carved”… I mean how the upper row pressed down on the still-not-fully-solidified stones of the lower row.
Of course, one could still argue they were carved, as the point is such precise carving, but let’s look at the next example.
May 12 • 9 tweets • 5 min read
1. So let’s talk about that melted staircase at the Temple of Hathor in Dendera 🧵
That’s me there, poking at the steps.
Now, the material of the staircase clearly didn’t just wear down—it looks like melted.
If steps wear down from frequent use, the dust and debris get swept away by the wind or cleaned up by staff. It doesn’t just settle neatly onto the step below. It doesn’t cling like it does here.
So clearly, the staircase melted. Or did it?2. The first red flag suggesting it couldn’t have melted is that the “intense heat” needed to melt stone didn’t touch the walls—just the stairs.
So, before anyone in ancient times kicked off a nuclear reaction here, they must’ve carefully insulated the sides of the stairs. Clearly, they didn’t want those beautiful carvings to melt. Totally understandable.
May 8 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
1. Another fascinating story: where does the meter really come from? 🧵
Someone recently pointed me to a French video about pyramid construction, in which they hint that it somehow relates to the size of water droplets 💧
But they don’t go into detail. So I did some digging. And as usual—it’s mind-blowing.2. First, I checked whether water droplets have any standard, known size.
Of course, they don’t. There are tiny droplets and large ones too. I even found various pipettes designed to produce different droplet sizes. So, dead end—at least so far.
May 3 • 19 tweets • 7 min read
1. I went to Germany to visit this enormous granite middle finger 🧵
The place is called Felsenmeer (Sea of Rocks), basically a massive rockslide made up of fridge-sized boulders—some of which have shapes that are pretty hard to explain with just natural forces.
And that's okay, because no one really tries to explain them that way. Turns out, this used to be a Roman quarry.
Conspiracy theorists, on the other hand, say it’s the ruins of some gigantic collapsed castle.
Spoiler alert—hope you don't mind: the gardener did it. So no need to keep reading, really.2. As we leave the parking lot, our trail takes us past a reconstructed Roman stone-cutting saw and a few rocks on display with visible chisel marks. They say there are about 300 carved and abandoned boulders scattered around the mountain.
Well then—let’s go see!
May 1 • 7 tweets • 4 min read
1/6. My Adventures in the Red Pyramid, Part Two: The Function
A 🧵
Let me start by saying this isn’t my own theory—this is the work of @thelandofchem. But it’s high-quality speculation, backed up here and there with solid evidence, so it’s worth getting to know.
So, you’re standing in the innermost chamber of the Red Pyramid, and it stinks to high heaven. But there’s no visible source of the stench—no bats, despite the rumors. And there never were any.
Let’s start with this: what is that smell? Pee? Ammonia? What if we assumed that it is ammonia, and for some strange reason it’s seeping out of the granite?
2/6. Well, if we assume that (and Geoffrey Drumm did), then that ammonia had to penetrate the granite somehow—and even the limestone behind it.
What kind of force can drive gas into the pores of solid rock?
That would be pressure. Now, follow the trail of pressure and notice: all the chamber ceilings are shaped like rooftops, narrowing upward. So if you could somehow push gas up into the peak of the ceiling, it would get more and more compressed.
And the special tool that pushes the gas up there? Water. The waters of the Nile.
Apr 27 • 7 tweets • 6 min read
Suddenly I gained another 500 followers, so for their sake, I'll briefly summarize what the game is all about here. It seems we're going to rewrite the first few chapters of human history. A 🧵
What started as "let's figure out how the unfinished obelisk in Aswan was made" has evolved in a direction where we can now confidently say the past didn't happen the way we thought.
Our ancestors were apparently capable of chemically altering stones, dissolving them, and then reassembling them. The evidence for this is that countless others besides me have done this, and it works, and it’s not even hard to do.
Unfortunately, there's no need for UFOs or ancient advanced civilizations to transport stone blocks of, say, 20-25 tons, or God forbid, 1000 tons. They weren’t hauling the stone blocks around, but just the raw material. In buckets.
The megalithic structures are masonry works, just that the mortar is a completely different material than what we use today. What could it be?
First Act
When I started to decipher the secret of the Aswan unfinished obelisk, I naturally had no intention of rewriting the early history of humanity. This realization came later. The mystery of the unfinished obelisk lies in the mysterious scoop marks, approximately 50x50 cm indentations, which look as though someone gouged out the granite with a giant ice cream scoop.
The official explanation is completely wrong, I won’t even go into that, it’s nonsense.
However, my experiment was successful, and indeed, I was able to chemically etch the supposedly indestructible granite with simple tools in my own backyard. All it took was a grill chimney starter, some charcoal, and - natron.
As it turned out, modern humanity of course knows that molten natron dissolves granite, or more accurately quartz, and this is used in several industrial processes, from pottery (cracking glazes) to recycling rare metals (liberating metals from circuit boards).
It's just that archaeologists didn’t know.
Which I have no problem with, other than the fact that they know now but still ignore the facts.
Apr 18 • 13 tweets • 7 min read
1/13. The necessity of casing stones on pyramids. A thread🧵
It's widely known that the Egyptian pyramids once had an extra outer layer made of whiter, higher-quality stone than the limestone used inside. Why? To make them gleam in the sunlight and proclaim the pharaoh’s glory from afar.
But what if that wasn’t the real reason for the capstones?
2/13. I’ve long suspected that the capstones weren’t just slapped onto the pyramids for the sake of aesthetics.
And recently, while toying around with (impossible!!!) artificial limestone, I stumbled upon a fascinating piece of evidence. Using two shot glasses, I created two different artificial limestone samples — we’ll get back to those in just a bit.
Apr 2 • 11 tweets • 7 min read
Alright, let’s dive into the 7-hour-long “stone softening” video. To make navigation easier, I’ve added jump points—but of course, anyone who wants to can watch the full 7 hours.
What’s really important: this, as it stands, is not a technology. It’s a proof of concept—a redundant demonstration of a basic chemical principle: molten lye eats granite, which then completely dissolves. And naturally, due to the chemical reaction, it changes color. Obviously.
Only brain-dead morons question the laws of nature.
Jimmi Corsetti, aka Dumb Inside Number 6 @brightinsight6, questioned them. Good for him!
But let’s get back to common sense:
This can’t really be called a “technology” in its current form. For one, the ancients didn’t have iron pots—and probably not even copper. And even if they had, both iron and copper dissolve in molten lye.
Which is exactly what we see in the experiment: the pot slowly gets eaten away. In fact, in this particular video, the pot eats up more lye than my stone does. But hey, I win 😊
It becomes a technology if we swap the metal pot for a stone one—say, the top of a rock or a granite block.
Or better yet, a granite quarry in Aswan. Because if the rock is the pot, it’ll dissolve too, no doubt—but that’s the point, right? We want to dissolve granite, and if the “pot” melts away with it—well, hooray!
So, after cutting off a piece of red granite with an angle grinder, I carry it to the pot without making a cut in the footage, so no fraud - at least until this point. 🤣
It’s worth noting that the cut didn’t go all the way through—I snapped it off at the end. That fracture line will be useful later, since the lye drastically alters the stone, but the little kite-shaped break remains almost entirely visible throughout.
A visual reminder that the stone is the same, no matter what Dumb Inside Number 6 is screaming.
One more thing: during the entire “cooking” process, there’s a stopwatch running next to the pot. I start it at the 24-minute mark in the video (no point starting earlier), and even then I’m risking that some idiot will claim I stitched together the left and right halves of the footage.
Let's see what happens next in the pot.
A 🧵
1/11
At 02:33 you can clearly see The Granite Trapeze on both the original piece of granite and the piece I cut.
2/11
Mar 5 • 12 tweets • 7 min read
Here’s an overhead view of the Great Pyramid of Giza.
I used this image in my newly published book to prove a point. Then along came a so-called "real archaeologist," trying to make a fool of me. "Real archaeologists" come and go—I don’t even remember his name.
But a few things have happened since then. Let’s see who was right.
Let’s zoom in!
1/12
A 🧵
Here comes the shameless plug—here’s the book where you’ll find out the why and the how.
I wrote this book, and I can’t write—so brace yourself, because it’s boring, confusing, and long! Just ask around.
And now, the ancient light bulb 💡 in the Hathor temple in Dendera, Egypt. I was there, but I admit openly I have absolutely no clue what it is. But…
A 🧵
1/6
This carving (?) can be found in the basement of the temple, and you have two choices to go down: legally or illegally.
The legal way is to buy an additional ticket at the entrance for 2$, but it’s not advertised too much, so by the time you realize you made a mistake, you are far-far away from the kiosk, deep in the temple.
But this is Egypt, every door opens with a dollar bill 💵, so the illegal way of entering is actually less expensive than the legal way.
Me, being a loser, bought the additional ticket at the entrance for 2$, while other people simply walked in giving 1$ tip to the guard.
2/6
Jul 5, 2024 • 18 tweets • 32 min read
Tesla: Pro and Con through the Eyes of a Pseudo-Archeologist
A thread 🧵 (0/17)
The title isn’t as silly as it first seems. I was a Tesla investor before becoming a pseudo-archeologist, back in 2018. I witnessed the glorious 16-fold surge and the three-year-long struggle that, fortunately, seems to be ending now. Or not.
Few people know this side of me on X, but many do at home. That’s how a trader friend asked me to summarize the pros and cons of TSLA, wondering if he should short or buy shares.
If I tell you what made Tesla, SpaceX, and Elon Musk’s other ventures great, you’ll forget about shorting forever. Betting against Elon Musk is a fool’s game.
So, what made all of Elon Musk’s ventures successful? Luck? Nope, it’s a particular mindset from Elon Musk himself, regardless of what anyone says.
Anyone who thinks Elon Musk’s reusable rocket was a scam or that he had nothing to do with the results should stop reading now and certainly not comment under this article.
Those who believe profitable electric cars can only be made through cheating, please join the above group and stop reading my article.
I claim that while Elon Musk didn’t invent the electric car or tunnels, he did invent something that makes all his ventures accomplish impossible missions.
This something is called "Company Management".
This is the one “thing” he uniquely brought to the table. I’m not saying he wasn’t present during Neuralink’s early steps, but he certainly didn’t sharpen the first brain-implant needle.
Without his company management method, humanity wouldn’t have coin-sized implants that directly read neurons, nor would it have reusable orbital rockets.
(Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson’s space junk—um, space tourism—solutions can’t reach orbit, hence they have no actual economic value and never will because they can’t move forward.)
This invention of Elon’s is complex and can be approached from a hundred angles, but its complexity is understood only after a lot of engagement. In this article, I’ll bombard you with numerous perspectives; the overall picture will likely form in your mind later, and that’s natural.
There’s no other way to project a 28-dimensional system onto a plane except by providing snapshots from various angles, which will coalesce only in your mind. Elon Musk’s management style is a 28-dimensional system mostly unknown to the outside world, let alone understood.
People learn by being bombarded with independent facts and then letting their brains form an internal representation based on the known facts. Even if it’s 28-dimensional. And when this happens and a reality model forms in your mind, it’s called understanding. That’s when you shout, “Eureka!”
Enough foreplay, let’s have a serious Elon Musk quote!
Uhh, this isn’t it!!!! 😱 Sorry! My fault!
I only included this because at every moment in history, someone writes that Elon Musk has gone truly mad, just look at what he tweets!
No! He didn’t just go mad! See, he was mad even back in 2011! This lovely post has been waiting for likes for over ten years😊
Let’s find another Elon Musk quote that might help us start.