🧵1/ You might have been flabbergasted by the recent order from U.S. District Court Judge Ana C. Reyes, where she cited the musical “Hamilton” in overturning the Trump Admin’s decision to restrict transgenders from serving in the U.S. Military.

But that’s just the beginning…
2/ Only a month ago, on February 19, Judge Reyes was subject to a judicial misconduct complaint by the Office of the U.S. Attorney General for “hostile and egregious misconduct that violate[d]” two of the Canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Can you guess what they were?

🚨PCA DEACONESS REPORT: FINDINGS🚨

I have recently concluded an investigation into the many churches in the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) to determine whether any of them have female deacons (or “deaconesses” as they are commonly called) listed on their websites.

I am now ready to release my initial findings. This data comes from readily available information on PCA church websites, taking these sites at face value, as this is how the churches have chosen to present themselves. Background on me: I am a member in good standing of a PCA church. I am not an ordained Elder or Deacon, but I have been a lifelong member of the PCA and deeply care about its wellbeing. I love the PCA and want to see it flourish in purity and peace.

Apparently, Zach Garris is partially being accused of violating this charge from 2 Timothy 2:23:

“Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies; you know that they breed quarrels.“

The logic goes that Garris’s defense of Biblical slavery was unnecessarily divisive. Under this logic, there are thousands in the PCA that should immediately be investigated for violating 2 Timothy 2:23.

Don’t believe me?

Let me ask you: does this post violate 2 Timothy 2:23?

Would it be okay if someone wore a “Pro White” shirt to church?

The Logical Case for Trump’s Attempted Assassination Being an Inside Job.

There are really only two questions left, regarding the “deep state’s” level of complicity in the attempted assassination of DJT: (1) extreme negligence, or (2) active participation. In this thread, I will make the case for option #2. My case will be made by examining the evidence and determining the proper burden of proof in this case and cases like it.

I love the God who drowned all of the men, women, and children on the Earth (Genesis 7:21–23) I love the God who utterly destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for its rampant and debased homosexuality (Genesis 19:23-25)

This one struck me as more tragic than usual because the dinks are just so average-looking. Their entire appearance screams “dad and mom” vibe.

Other dink videos at least attempt to look glamorous.

But you could insert children into this video and they would fit like a glove.

https://twitter.com/iamlewisu/status/1784962006153388354

“We slept in ‘til 7, but laid in bed until 8.”

You can literally do this, with a child, and it’s the most fun thing ever.

I read the full article. Moore makes a horrible case here. 🧵

First, he strawmans his opponents as arguing that Leviticus *mandates* civil penalties for homosexuality, when in fact, they argue that Leviticus *allows* civil penalties for homosexuality.

1/8

https://twitter.com/drmoore/status/1664311208760033288

Second, he applies intra-church stories and teachings to the civil magistrate. Yes, Paul told us simply to purge homosexuals from the church. No, Paul never told the government to punish them.

But neither did he tell the government *not* to punish them. Why would he?

2/8