✝️Why John 4:22 isn't about jews in one simple image + An index of my threads on European Christian replacement Theology and other topics/posts for easy reference.

🔻Verses 21 tells us that Jesus rejects the proto-Judahite 2nd temple, and this point is essentially repeated again in Verse 23.

🔻Verse 22 refers to Jesus being the full revelation of Salvation through the Tribe of Judea, or his legal and blood claim to the Crown of Israel. Jesus tells the Samaritan woman this because she is a remnant of the Northern Tribes. At this point, the only people who have that full revelation are the apostles and a few followers of Jesus' ministry.

🔻Verse 23 is about the crucifixion. The "hour" mentioned is when Jesus is slain on the cross, which creates the New Covenant. This is why Jesus says the Father seeks for humanity to worship in a new way through the Holy Spirit and Truth, which is Jesus himself.

🔻Verse 24 backs the teachings of Saint Paul: That the heirs of the promise of Abraham apply to those who have faith in Christ. Israel is now heavenly, or Spiritual, not a promised nation or physical place. Why Jesus is not a Jew:

🔻 Jesus never refers to himself as a cultural Jew:
x.com/GasMaskNat/sta…

🔻 Jesus saw modern jews as outside of Israel:
x.com/GasMaskNat/sta…

🔻 Jesus didn't celebrate Hanukkah
x.com/GasMaskNat/sta…

🔻 Why Jesus is the 3rd Temple and John 4:
x.com/GasMaskNat/sta…

🔻 The meaning of "jew" in the Bible:
x.com/GasMaskNat/sta…

🔻Jesus never calls himself "King of the Jews":
(I'll rework and expound on this one soon)
x.com/MUHTableTalks/…

The Adam Green Deception

Adam Green's book, the Jesus Deception is Black Propaganda that violates logic, historical consensus, inverts replacement theology, and blasphemes the European foundation of Christendom.

This thread will examine the following:

🔻 The main concepts Green misuses to attack Christ.
🔻 Show why each chapter is poorly written from a logical, historical, and Christian perspective.
🔻 Show how his book is similar to ISIS rhetoric and extremist in nature.
🔻 Investigate if it was Written by AI LLM models. The Jesus Deception begs you to believe that Jesus of Nazareth never existed as a historical figure and that Christianity itself was constructed by Heterodox and irrelevant jewish sects, or was simply retroactively invented through interpretive techniques that only later produced the Talmud.

The book was largely created by plagiarizing other fringe mythicist ideas, jewish frameworks from after the 1st century, a reliance on a surface level understanding of the dead sea scrolls and non-canonical books of the bible, and a dash of modern atheistic moralism. Green then tries to desperate tie all this cope together with a plethora of logical fallacies by stretching out maybe 8 chapters of content into 18.

The books methodology is non-existent as it basically just points the finger at all historical consensus and shouts, "NUH UH!" in a repetitive and soulless fashion, while also standing on fringe jewish and atheist understanding as it's only authority.

The "book" itself is largely incomprehensible nonsense unless you're already an acolyte to his brand of extremist propaganda. However, the purpose of the this new propaganda is to deliver a payload of cognitive warfare to skeptical right wingers and push them away from Europe's true spiritual immune system: Christianity.

✝️✡️☪️The entire concept of "Abrahamic" faiths is a French intelligence fabrication and an early attempt at social engineering due to Sykes–Picot. Much like the term "Judaeo-Christian," it is a modern construct derived from a left wing and liberal humanistic bias.

So, why have so many overtly anti-Christian social media accounts resurrected this strange post War liberal idea, while claiming to be pro-Western or pro-European?

Lets dive into its peculiar origins, the man behind it, and many of the open criticisms of the theory to find a deeper understanding of this astroturfed false concept. The man who conjured up the modern idea of "Abrahamic" in 1949 was Louis Massignon, pictured below listening to Muhammad Taki recite the Qur'an.

Massignon worked for the 2ème Bureau, or Second Bureau, as a "translator". The second bureau was responsible for counterintelligence and intelligence gathering for the Sykes–Picot mission in 1917, a secret accord between the UK and France to petition the Middle East.

On June 15, 1919, Massignon was appointed provisionally to the Chair of Muslim Sociology and Sociography at the Collège de France in Paris.

Although Massignon wasn't professionally active during WW2 according to sources, he was involved in helping jewish scholars flee Germany to spread Frankfurt school propaganda around the western world.

✝️Positive Christianity rejected the idea that the Old Testament was "jewish" because it was divisive. Hitler gives us a prime example though his own political action against Arthur Dinter, a loyal party Christian.

🔹

"We are convinced, if Christ were to come down to earth today, he would not refuse his blessing to those who strive to apply Christianity practically, to eliminate mutual self-help, class struggle, and class arrogance.

We will strive to make it clear to everyone that it is a disgrace not to want to see the distress, while we are striving to suppress the dragging down of German culture.

In our ranks we tolerate no one who violates the ideas of Christianity, who opposes someone so minded, fights him, or poses as an arch enemy of Christianity.

This movement of ours is truly Christian.

We are filled with the desire that Catholics and Protestants may find one another in the deep distress of our own people.

We will suppress any attempt to put the religious ideas in our movement up for discussion in any way. And when we fight the center party, we do not do so for religious reasons.

But because it mocks and scorns the word Christianity, because it is ready to throw Christianity overboard for the sake of a ministerial post. We fight the centre for national political reasons, not because it wants to be a Catholic party.

Beware of those who come in sheep's clothing.

We protest against degrading Christianity to political service."

- Adolf Hitler
27th October 1928 Passau
Sourced: BAZ NS 26/55
Hitler gave two speeches on this day: The Schmeroldkeller and the Hotel Omibus, though it's possible he included similar comments in both speeches, as he generally had loose notes and improvised on themes. ✝️ Who was Arthur Dinter and how can he help us understand this speech?

This speech was given just a few weeks after Hitler ejected Arthur Dinter from the NSDAP and was partially aimed at him in a similar way that comments in Mein Kampf were aimed at Ludendorff's neo-paganism.

After his stay in Landsberg prison Adolf had gone to great lengths to reforge the party after it had split into various factions in his absence. He denounced the "religious reformers", or the Volkish pagans, entirely due to their stance on Christianity, and firmly declared that Christian infighting was not allowed within the organization on any level.

For documentation on these facts see my thread on Reforging the NSDAP here:
x.com/CharIemagn3/st…

Arthur Dinter had joined the NSDAP three years earlier in 1925. Dinter wasn't just some random "Nazi" with no influence. He was party member number 5, and had connected deeply with Adolf during his stay in prison. In April of 1925 Hitler had appointed him Gauleiter of Gau Thuringia, or party leader of that region. Dinter had also published the party newspaper "Der Nationalsozialist" in Weimar which had been instrumental in spreading their ideas to other Germans.

Dinter was motivated, connected, and intelligent, but his worth did not protect him when he challenged Hitler's concept of Positive Christianity.

▫️ Insert Photo: Heinrich Hoffmann picture postcard from the “Reich Party Congress Nuremberg 1927″ group photo showing Adolf Hitler, Gottfried Feder and Arthur Dinter in the center, flanked by Goebbels and Hühnlein

🗣️Discussion of a Speech given by Göring delivered on June 24, 1935, at a solstice event that deals with critics calling the regime "Pagan". The irony being that Heathens are trying to reframe this speech and use it as "proof of paganism", which is what Goring was trying to counter.

Key Notes as we read the Speech:

1. "Almighty" (Allmächtiger) Refers to the Christian God.

In 1930s Nazi usage, "der Allmächtige" was standard Christian terminology, drawn from biblical language (e.g., "Almighty God" in Lutheran translations of Genesis 17:1 or Revelation 1:8).

2. The Speech use at least 10 Christian references to rebirth, resurrection, and Almighty God to frame Hitler as a savior of the German people.

3. Zero references to wotan, odin, Atheism, Indo-Arayanism, or anything resembling paganism.

4. The Newspaper itself MOCKs paganism and calls it "Chatter" or "Prattle" which is a dismissive term for Nonsense or empty talk. (see Insert Image on post 3).

The idea that anyone could try to use this speech to claim the NSDAP was pagan is outright anti-White propaganda.

("Abrechnung mit dem Geschwätz des Neuheidentums" — "Geschwätz" literally means "chatter" or "prattle," a dismissive term for nonsense or empty talk.)

*All content is for Historical purposes.* 🗣️Full Speech and Themes, presented for Historical purposes. Number citations represent all the references to Christianity, or use of Christian concepts that will be outlined in the post below.

_____________________

The rebirth! (1)

In such hours of solemn exaltation of our people, its feelings rise powerfully. This is no longer a gathering of a party in the old sense; here the entire German people have come together in a great community of blood. In such hours, the individual feels most deeply that he belongs to this community of blood and spirit. (2)

We ask these questions today: Who are we? Where do we come from? What binds us together, what drives us, what has awakened us from deepest despair and led us to this miracle of Germany's resurrection? (3)

The answer is simple and clear: the voice of the blood!We are the descendants of those who once, in ancient times, lived here on this soil and drew their strength from it. Our ancestors were called pagans – let them call them pagans! THAT IS NOT THE POINT; the point is that they were of the same Germanic blood as we are.

If they call it paganism when we make a pilgrimage to an ancient sacred site of our ancestors – let them call that paganism too.

If they say that lighting solstice fires on the heights is pagan – let them also call that paganism. We do not ask whether something is pagan or Christian; we ask: Does it serve the preservation and strengthening of our people?

Does it come from the voice of the blood? Then, if someone calls a belief in miracles pagan, we can only say: The greatest miracle that has happened to the German people in all its history was brought about by the Almighty (4) through Adolf Hitler.

(Stormy applause and Heil calls)

Can anyone here in Germany today deny that without this man we would still be in the deepest misery? Does anyone here believe that without this man Germany could have risen again? (5)

We do not need proclaimed miracles (6); we have experienced the greatest miracle (7) that a people can experience: the resurrection (8) from the deepest distress to new life and greatness through one man sent by God. (9) What binds us Germans today is not some abstract dogma, not some church quarreling; what binds us is the voice of the blood, the community of blood. We feel today as our ancestors felt thousands of years ago when they gathered on these heights at solstice to celebrate the victory of light over darkness. Today we celebrate the victory of the German people over its enemies, over chaos and despair.

And if someone says: But you are turning away from the faith of your fathers – NO! We are returning to the sources of strength of our fathers.

WE DO NOT WANT TO CREATE A NEW RELIGION; we want to live the eternal laws of blood and soil that the Almighty (10) has given to every people.

Whoever feels German blood in his veins will follow these laws, whether he calls himself Christian or something else. But whoever puts foreign dogmas above the voice of the blood is no longer a true German.

(Enthusiastic applause)

I ask you: Do you believe in an eternal Germany?(Tumultuous Yes! and HH!)

Do you believe that this Germany will last longer than all the quarreling of priests and all the dogmas?

(Yes!)

Then let us swear here on this ancient Germanic sacred mountain: We will remain faithful to the voice of the blood, faithful to Adolf Hitler, faithful to the eternal Germany!

The people will never again be torn apart by class hatred or religious quarreling. The Almighty (11) has given us the Führer who has united us all.

HH!

(The masses rise in endless Heil calls. The bands play the Horst-Wessel-Lied and Deutschlandlied.)

✝️Bäumler's Nietzsche. The only acceptable form of Nietzsche for the true Nationalist race realist.

This thread shares excerpts from Alfred Bäumler's "Nietzsche and National Socialism" from 1937. Alfred Bäumler was the main man tasked with adapting Nietzsche's writings to the NS worldview.

This would be part of THE semi-"official" viewpoint on Nietzsche from the Third Reich, and it gives us a clearer picture of how vastly different the "Nazis" would have viewed him 90 years ago. I will compare and contrast this Nietzsche with the modern left wing "Heathen revisionist" neo pagan version that treats his writings as a bludgeon against European identity.

This Post will outline 5 Sections from the piece with a subtitles so I can then use those subtitles to refer to the passages at the end of the thread with my comments.

🟥1. Christians are Superior.
⬜️2. Jesus Christ is not of the World.
⬛️3. Christ heightened responsibility, as should we.
🟨4. Will to Power as a Blueprint for the NSDAP.
🟦5. Anti-Clerical, NOT anti-Christian. Bäumler begins by comparing Nietzsche critique of European secularism and Nihilism, to Hitler's challenge of the Weimar decay in the 1920's. He then begins to discuss Christianity in depth:

🟥1. Christians are Superior:

"Beyond this suffocating ideology stands Nietzsche’s stark declaration: "God is dead." This statement has often been understood only as a historical observation—that faith in God has disappeared, that he no longer holds power over men’s lives. Nietzsche did not struggle against the Christian God, nor was he shaken by his death. He did not deny that some Christians still remained. In fact, he regarded them with a certain respect, seeing in them a superior type of person compared to the decadent artists and intellectuals of his time. He was entirely free from the resentment of those who fight against religion only to liberate themselves from its burden.

For Nietzsche, knowledge of the death of the Christian God was not a doctrine or a program but the recognition of an epochal transformation. He did not seek the death of the Christian God but bore witness to the decline of faith in him. What had come to an end was not merely a theology but an entire world order. It was the close of the Middle Ages in Europe."

Volkisch Spirit is "racefirst" on Telegram and runs the NS heathenry channel which is packed with non-Whites who hate Christianity and Germans. Volkisch Spirit email is "Vilapaga" which connects him to a brazillian Instagram account that pushes Paganism, probably on the dime of the leftist ClA.