The front page of NYT right now features a video with the caption, "Palestinians celebrating the cease-fire deal."

But the crowd is apparently chanting in support of Hamas's Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades. They're celebrating Hamas terrorists.

(More below.) See e.g.
x.com/S2FUncensored/…
instagram.com/reel/DPlasHIDL…

Cross reference:
x.com/ihcentoo/statu…

Not only is 25% not "an overwhelming majority" of the International Association of Genocide Scholars, as claimed by Amnesty director Agnes Callamard…

But the Association is also full of non-scholars, e.g. MD Nidal Jboor, who just lauded "freedom fighters," aka genocidal Hamas.
Here, at the extremist "People's Conference for Palestine," the self-appointed "genocide scholar" cheers freedom fighters. I wonder how he voted.
instagram.com/reel/DOC174ygO…

How unserious is "genocide scholar" Raz Segal?

When he claimed, less than a week after Hamas's massacre, that Israel is guilty of genocide, he *led* with this.

Gallant called Hamas "animals." Biden said their attack was "evil."

Calling a massacre "evil" is genocide. (That "complete siege," by the way, ended almost as soon as it started.)

The FIRST PARAGRAPH of Suzy Hansen's NY Mag piece already shares a concocted lie — one repeated again at the piece's conclusion.

There's no girl videotaping and crying. It's doctored video — the audio spliced on for effect.

The rest of her piece is hardly more forthright. What did the person who we hear crying actual think about the unrelated video?

"I don't understand what the point of you editing it and putting my voice over it… May God curse you."

The knowledge that if I'm ever shot in the back then repeatedly shot while crawling away, the @nytimes will wax philosophical about my murderers… "some hint of acceptance"
–@nytimes

The online campaign to blame Jews for what attackers characterized as a "Jew hunt, which included miscaptioned video that spread on X, made its way to mainstream media.
(🧵) ⇝ The New York Times insisted it had video of Israelis chanting that there are no children in Gaza. Were they duped by the widely circulated miscaptioned video?

After initially stonewalling, the paper informed @CAMERAorg it had no such video, and published corrections. 🧵

The @nytimes anti-Israel bias isn't organic.

It's not an authentic reflection of events.

The paper intentionally hires extremists.

Yet another example: To help cover Israel after Israelis were slaughtered on Oct. 7, the NYT turned to… a former Electronic Intifada editor. 2/ Electronic Intifada is a pro-Hamas, PRO-OCT 7, rape-denying outlet. Here they describe Cassel as their former editor.

And yes, Cassel also worked for Al Jazeera (which I sometimes call the Holocaust denial network, owing to their habit of denying the Holocaust).

1/ In his memoirs, historian Avi Shlaim joins those who blame Jews for the dissolution of the Iraqi Jewish community.

In the process, he brazenly fabricates history, changing the date of one of the allegedly Jewish bombs so that his thesis can make sense. 2/ This is because the bombs that Shlaim blames on the Zionist underground in Baghdad came after most Jews had registered to leave under an Iraqi law that allowed them to emigrate at the expense of their nationality. Three of the bombs came after the registration deadline past.

1/ Among those hired by the @nytimes to cover Israel-related topics:
* The "How great you are, Hitler" guy
* Someone who denied Hamas murders civilians
* Someone who said she can't even look at Israelis and that her “objectivity got thrown out the window"

And now introducing…🥁 2/ Another radical anti-Israel hire by the @nytimes.

Bora Erden, an anti-Israel activist, who was hired days after the Oct. 7 massacre to cover Israel and anti-Israel activists.

Who is Erden?

1/ Wikipedia's volunteer editors, so many of whom are naked partisans, blacklisted ADL as an unreliable source.

The Wikipedia that traffics in fake quotes. 2/ This Wikipedia:

1/ The @nytimes regularly sanitizes anti-Israel protests.

Its coverage of Saturday's protest in D.C. conceals that demonstrators held a banner supporting Al Qassam—Hamas's armed branch behind the Oct. 7 slaughter—while chanting that Hezbollah should "kill another Zionist now." 2/ Also ignored by the NYT is a sign that said "stand with Hamas."

https://x.com/RitchieTorres/status/1799526928690372724

1/ This, in the @nytimes today, is false. 2/ This, about Cal Poly, in the @nytimes today, is also false.

1/ Is there a difference between identifying by name someone belligerently acting out in a public space and "doxxing"?

The idea that there's a sort of right to complete anonymity for people publicly behaving like heartless asses seems, well, questionable. 2/ Anyhow, here's @npr making a hero out of a hater:

npr.org/2024/04/11/123…

The @nytimes insists that the message "100 days" shared by an Israeli soccer player is a statement about "the start of the war."

The journalistic equivalent of callously tearing down a hostage poster.

A short thread on how the @nytimes flagrantly, inexcusably manipulated readers by playing games with statistics.

A front-page, above-the-fold story a couple Sunday's ago exploring how this Gaza conflict compares to other global wars. Or at least went through the motions. 2/ One of four points of comparison was 2003, Iraq, about which @LaurenLeatherby wrote that more women and children have been reported killed in Gaza "in less than two months" than civilians killed by US-led attacks "in the entire first year of the invasion of Iraq."

1/ The same CAIR that pretended Israel's military response to the Oct. 7 Hamas slaughter of Israelis was "unprovoked" also loved the Oct. 7 Hamas slaughter.

https://twitter.com/MEMRIReports/status/1732712958281629864

https://twitter.com/GileadIni/status/1712987117570130238

1/ Ben Collins, a senior reporter for NBC News who apparently specializes in "disinformation" and "the internet," has weighed in as follows on the calamity at the Gaza hospital—now widely understood to be the result of a misfired Palestinian rocket. 2/ First a retweet of an inaccurate claim that the hospital was "bombed." Then another retweet of the same.

1/ After likely the largest atrocity against Jewish civilians since the Holocaust, the @nytimes front page—which talks of an "assault" by "militants" whose "gunmen" infiltrated Israel—does use a "terror" word once.

Only, it's in reference to *Palestinians* being terrified. This was Israel's 9/11.

Here, by contrast, is the same paper's 9/11 coverage, with a top headline citing our "day of terror," and paragraph one on the right clearly and correctly naming "the worst and most audacious terror attack" in US history.

1/ Above all, my heart is with Israel as it mourns. As it tries to recover what it can of stolen lives and bodies, children and grandparents. As it processes what might be the worst attack on innocent Jews since 1940s Europe. As it looks to rescue. And to forcefully deter. 2/ I have room in my heart, too, for disgust and rage at the murderers, the hostage-takers, the Gaza terrorists weaned on antisemitic hate, who, of course are responsible for yesterday's massacre.

1/ If you fail the "Iron Dome test," you should be disqualified from adult conversations about the Arab-Israeli conflict, and probably most other things.

Or: Tell me where you stand on shooting down rockets fired at civilians, and I'll tell you whether your soul is broken. 2/ For whatever reason I found myself thinking about this today, and I'm (still) astonished.

I've done this before, but I'm doing it again. Because it's astonishing.

It's astonishing that Lara Friedman ever said this. She failed the most basic test.

Pictured below is (more) rank hypocrisy by Francesca Albanese.

Left: she defends material suggesting all of Israel is actually Palestine, saying it's "racist" to oppose the material.

Right: She suddenly recognizes it's wrong to suggest a country is a different country.
Any reference to a couple of tweets by Albanese will inevitably understate the extent of her extremism.

And Smotrich is certainly an extremist, too.

Still, she shouldn't get a pass.