How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
We prefer a movement from the original monopoly price (Pm0) to the competitive price (Pc0), which for reasonable supply expansions, is bigger than the movement to the new monopoly price (Pm1).
If progressives are right, this should intensify competitive pressure, putting downward pressure on the overall bill. And bravo to the NYT reporter who quoted an expert in support of this view. Hope he doesn’t get fired! 2/3



The logic here is pretty clear: Workers attempting to unionize are generally trying to countervail buying power. If there were good outside employment options, workers would just leave. Thus, efforts to quash unionization can be understood as attempts to preserve monopsony power.
Does The Economist think Trump’s tariffs on steel, or Trump’s massive subsidy of Covid vaccines were exemplars of laissez faire? Or can only a Democrat reject laissez faire? Newsflash: Laissez faire is dead, and it died long ago. There is no constituency for it, in either party.
The paper spells out all the ways competition could contribute to inflation, including through "feedback effects," such as when inflation is used as pretext or facilitating mechanism by firms in concentrated industries to raise prices further.