Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Iain Porter Profile picture
Iain Porter
@IainKPorter
Senior Policy Adviser at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation @jrf_uk also @iainkporter.bsky.social
Mar 26 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
DWP is using a sleight of hand in its disability benefit cuts impact assessment: Actual increase in poverty is closer to 400,000, not the 250,000 in the impact assessment.

Quick thread explaining why. 🧵1/7 There are 3 separate impacts shown at:

Changes to PIP increase poverty by 300,000 (Table B2) 2/7 assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67e3fa66…DWP impact assessment: PIP cuts poverty impact of 300,000
Mar 18 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
Big picture today is Government chose to cut unprecedented £5bn of income from disabled people at highest risk of hardship. This drive for cost savings undermines any positive changes contained in the disability benefits green paper.

Here are some other big problems:🧵1/11 JRF Chief Executive Paul Kissack said: "No truly moral choice would leave disabled people without the very support that is designed to allow them to lead a dignified life, nor would it leave them facing hardship. These would be unprecedented disability benefits cuts. “Ideas like the Right to Try Guarantee help to remove the barriers that prevent people from working but enormous cuts mean the Government risks undermining these positives. Making it harder for people to qualify for support, or cutting their support, puts more pressure on people who are already struggling to cope. "... New claimants of Universal Credit’s health element from 2026 will receive ~£48 a week less UC in total than under current system - a huge halving of support (comprising ~£51 cut to UC LCWRA element, offset by only ~£3 rise in UC standard allowance) 2/11
Mar 14 • 8 tweets • 3 min read
Yesterday, a Government press release claimed the number of people “considered too sick to work” had "quadrupled" since the pandemic (a "383% rise"). This is incorrect. In fact, it’s not even close. It's more like 40%.

This thread explains why 🧵1/7 Image of Government press release stating a "383% rise in less than five years" in the number of people considered too sick to look for work. The press release ignores that Universal Credit was still early in rollout pre-pandemic, so starts from a very low number. It ignores equivalent group in the legacy ESA benefit that UC is replacing. You can't compare UC LCWRA over time without including the equivalent ESA. 2/7
Nov 14, 2024 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
Govt has committed to £3bn cuts to health/disability benefits. But targeting arbitrary savings (set by previous Govt) won't lead to effective reforms that unlock work, and risks deeper hardship for disabled people.

New @jrf_uk @scope report shows the changes we really need🧵1/12 Scope and JRF logos This affects disabled people at severe risk of hardship. Of adults on health-related Universal Credit:

- 75% are in material deprivation (a Govt measure of inability to afford basic items)
- 34% couldn't afford to keep their house warm
- 24% used a food bank last year. 2/12 This chart shows different indicators of hardship for people receiving health-related Universal Credit, compared to people receiving non-health-related Universal Credit, compared to all working-age people. Indicators include, for each of those groups: % of working-age adults who are in a household that had to use a food bank in the last 12 months; % who could not afford to keep their house warm; % experiencing material deprivation; % in a food insecure household; % in a household with 'very low food security'; and % who could not afford to keep up to date with bills. Overall the chart shows...
Mar 21, 2024 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Today's report from cross-party committee of MPs @CommonsWorkPen calls on Govt to set out a plan to address inadequate benefits that leave people unable to afford life's essentials, pointing to @jrf_uk @TrussellTrust work on an Essentials Guarantee🧵1/6

publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5804/cmse…
Committee report cover image The MPs found plenty of evidence that support is so inadequate that people are unable even to afford essentials like food or a warm home... 2/6 Excerpt from committee report showing examples of what people receiving benefits said about the adequacy of benefits and ability to afford essentials: 'A number of participants said benefit levels were too low, and described difficulties they faced trying to afford everyday living costs such as food and energy for heating their homes. One participant said heating was a “luxury”; another described how sometimes, they would wait until their hands were too cold to turn the page whilst reading before turning on the heating for an hour. One participant spoke about the challenging budgeting choi...