Redpillers used to say that women values “feels over reals.” This means that "what women feel is more important to them than the truth."

It should have been be “feels = reals." What most women feel appears to them as if it IS the truth.

Last year I briefly dated a VERY intelligent young woman. She chose me, in part, because intelligence impresses her, and she has a hard time finding a high enough level of it. (She used to ask me to explain things and her eyes would roll back and she'd melt into the pillow as I started rattling off details like an encyclopedia.)

Despite the big brain on her, she still struggled with the classic "man vs woman" arguments. This was because she FELT that things were true, or more accurately: that FEELINGS ARE TRUE.

Feels = reals.

The biggest misunderstanding we had, which was never resolved, was why I didn't like makeup. I requested that she not wear any, and I explained why I dislike it.

She then waited a while and asked me to rate photos of different women. Of course, I rated the women with makeup higher than those without. That's what makeup is for! It artificially makes you appear more attractive. This is what I dislike about it. That and it tastes like crayons.

She became upset when she saw me rate with-makeup photos higher than without. She even showed me the same girl with and without makeup back-to-back to "gotcha" me. To her, this "proved" that I actually DID prefer makeup, because my FEELINGS about who was more visually attractive were MORE REAL than my preference that women do not wear makeup.

From this, she concluded that I MUST just want her to be less attractive so that I have less competition from other men, which was, of course, an ick.

No matter where the conversation went, she was not able to accept that the way I feel about appearance doesn't matter because it's based on something fake - a painted-on face - which is what I dislike about makeup. It's NOT REAL. What I dislike ABOUT makeup is NOT that it makes women LOOK WORSE - it's that it makes them LOOK BETTER, but in a FAKE way.

What mattered to her was that I FELT more attraction when the makeup was ON.

Feels = reals.

Women live in a world of feelings and relationships and not of objectivity. The feelings people have and what causes them is MORE REAL than physical reality. This is not a mistake; evolution designed women to devote brainpower to feelings because it's their job to recognize and respond to needs.

This is why women say things like "men force us to wear makeup" when a lot of us prefer it to be banned. We want it gone BECAUSE it gives us feelings based on something FAKE, but to women, the feelings CAN'T be fake. They are the base layer of reality. "Men having preferences is a crime."

Photo? Woman.

Joel chose not to QT me on this because he is a slimy, deceitful coward.

VERBAL BATTLE TACTICS INSIDE. IMPORTANT POST.

Joel posts this screenshot of what I said as if I would be embarrassed of it. Of course I did say this, because it is the right thing to say. We should all say it more.

What has happened to me and people like me in my country and many other countries must end, and it is FAR more important to win than it is to be fair to our enemies, who do not deserve empathy of any sort.

Here's why:

Whenever I and others like me speak about what has happened to us, we are ignored, called liars, threatened, and even attacked. Some have been murdered. What we are speaking about is real, but the enemy does not want to admit this. The enemy uses language as a weapon, NOT as communication. If you don't know what that means, learn it TODAY.

It works like this:

1. ENEMY says something like "we have to do [THING THAT IS BAD FOR YOU AND GOOD FOR ME] because of [NPC CATCH PHRASE]."

2. YOU say back to ENEMY: "But that is unjustified. I do not want [THING THAT IS BAD FOR ME] to happen. Also, I do not owe you [THING THAT IS GOOD FOR YOU].

- Notice how they start by saying "I get to hurt you because [REASON]" and then you say "But [REASON] is not actually reasonable or supported by reality." You are attempting to ARGUE. THIS IS WRONG. You will see why in step 3.

3. ENEMY says back to you "[THING THAT IS BAD FOR YOU] is not bad because of [NPC CATCHPHRASE]. The fact that you even said so makes you [NPC PEJORATIVE]."

- Notice how they do not address the substance of your argument. Instead, they vomit even more emotionally-loaded language that makes them feel justified in harming you further.

Here's an example where I fill in the blanks:

1. ENEMY: "We need fewer white men in positions of power, because of equity."

2. YOU: "White men have already been excluded unfairly from every meaningful opportunity in our own countries, which has harmed us to the point that we no longer can afford families. That was wrong to do. We do not owe you "equity," which actually means "stealing."

3. ENEMY: "You are repeating RACIST and BIGOTED MISINFORMATION. This did not happen to you, and if it did, I didn't do it, and if I did, it wasn't that bad, and if it was, then it's a good thing. Because you said a RACISM, now I get to hurt you."

Do you see the pattern? I've named it before.

"We are going to hurt you, and if you don't let us, that's dangerous, and so we get to hurt you."

"Let us kill you or we'll kill you."

Of course we should tyrannize these people! We should start TODAY. We do not owe them recognition as humans at all.

They are USING your sense of GUILT against you. Don't let them. They are saying: "We want you completely destroyed at any cost, but you should be fair and nice to us or you're mean." Why would you listen to them?

Emphatically yes, we should seek the power to completely remove the rights of people who've done this. They should have 0 participatory power. Immediate response: "You are a [NPC PEJORATIVE]"

Even when I outline their tactics, they still use them IN THE SAME THREAD, because they're not smart enough to figure anything else out.

Yes, I can.

THIS IS GONNA CLEAR A LOT UP. Go pee or get a glass of water first; you're gonna need a minute to process.

Welcome back. Have you noticed yet how leftists gravitate to certain things? How, sort of the same way that conservatives go hunting and fishing and watch sports, leftoid goblin perverts like these cluster around things like anime, video games, sexual deviancy, and anthropomorphism?

Well, conservatives do those things because that's what everyone else did. Daddy hunted. Grandpappy was Calvinist.

But... no one has done any of this dog mask shit before.

Now, if you ASK them, they might TELL you that they choose these things because they are "progressive."

"We are creative souls expressing who we truly are!" or whatever.

But if that was true, wouldn't they all have their own individualistic expressions of self? Why would "pup play" become popular with... what is it, like 10% of them now?

A while ago, @MattWalshBlog stated (perhaps rhetorically rather than conversationally) that he felt that anime was satanic, though he could not explain why. I offered to explain why in exchange for exposure, which isn't coming (I guess), so I'll reveal the throughline now:

Leftists actively hate their own free will. All of this weird shit they do? Those are attempts to rid themselves of responsibility. They don't want to be held accountable for anything. You know, like what we complain about in typical immature women.

I'm a dog = I'm just a dumb animal, care for me! (this is why children's cartoons are always animals; animal nature = child nature = innocent = no free will)

I'm actually a woman = I'm valuable because I exist, not because of what I DO!

Games = I still have to play and learn! I'm not a grown-up yet!

Communism = Guarantee me an income even if I do nothing!

Even most homosexuality = I'm in the girl's role now! This happens TO me, not because I EARNED it, but because I'm HERE!

What does this have to do with anime? Well, there's a reason I use cartoons in my videos. It's because they're simple. Like games. Like A-B-C, 1-2-3. Cartoons are a way of depicting ONLY the parts of something that you want people to look at.

Look at these faces I drew (image). The male one is just 3 circles, 2 dots, and a wavy line. There's VERY little room for interpretation. He's puzzled. She's disappointed. All of the remaining complexity of humanity is stripped away.

Drawing cartoons = "I did all the work of interpretation for you." That's why people come to me. I teach things quickly by showing you ONLY what you need to see.

Cartoons, anime in particular, are similarly stripped down. And anime in particular acts as a gateway drug because it is so widely used as a style. You can jump from artist to artist without feeling like you've "changed channels," and there is infinite content, so you spiral downward into self-imposed infancy (which is Satanic).

You start with Akira or Cowboy Bebop. You end up developing feelings for anime girls, who are easily idealized because they are only the bits of girls that you like, with none of that pesky human nature. You desire... simpler. Less human. Your chosen content gets more and more childish. Disney. My little pony. Whatever the internet has to offer (anything you can think of).

You get sucked into the feeling of experiencing only the good parts of life and none of the downsides, and before long, it comes out in your politics. "I should be a baby! Feed me! Wah!" is all the left says anymore.

And since we are long past the point where anyone who falls into this soul-blender can easily find others to support their delusions with a few clicks, we now have them acting it out in public, under the guise of "art" or "identity."

Look at absolutely any weird thing the left does, and what you will find is: "I'm baby." "I deserve."

No one wants to grow up. And you can't blame them; it doesn't pay anymore.

Finally: If that wasn't enough for you for one day, go read about who "Aleister Crowley" was and what the "Aeon of Horus" was. Is. you: "there are animes and video games with right-wing values"

fish: "you say hooks are dangerous, but many hooks have worms on them, which are good for eating"

This very normal-minded woman is arguing against firing totally useless employees because of their needs.

Pay careful attention: She is saying "it is wrong to fire 100% useless people because THEY HAVE NEEDS."

This is how the mind of a woman is built to care for babies. Babies have needs, and you can't expect them to provide anything. The mother says: "the baby! The baby! The baby NEEEEEEEEDS!" And then men provide for the baby.

This woman - who I'm gonna guess doesn't have her own kids - is not demonstrating empathy for adults, as she wants you to believe. She is demonstrating empathy for BABIES, but DIRECTED at adults.

This is basically a phantom pregnancy.

This is how putting women in charge of things destroys nations.

When men are in charge, they say "what are YOU gonna do for ME? What value do YOU bring to the company? The army? The nation?" Men have to think this way because if you give out more than you take in, you die.

Most women have no awareness of this at all. I call this "Santa-ism," because of how it resembles a child expecting magical free presents from Santa. "Cost? What's a cost?"

This is one reason why women fight so hard to take in infinity invaders and pay for them using your money. There's no such thing as a "cost" in the average female mind. The invaders are just babies who neeeeeeeeeed! Give them their needies, you NAZI!

Leftism is a mental illness caused by women not getting pregnant early enough in life, having a phantom pregnancy directed at useless, needy people (because that's how her mind recognizes babies), and then becoming violently angry when men don't want to feed her "babies."

And then weak, selfish men become leftist as a way of making those insane women feel validated, which causes comfort, and then they just hang around like buzzards until one of those women has a moment of desperation and selects a sub-par male.

Remember, politics is just psychology + economics, and psychology is just applied biology.

Feminism and leftism is just baby-crazies turning women's minds inside-out from lack of reproductive success, and weak male scavenger sexual strategy. In case she deletes, and in case you need more background on how bad the psychosis gets when women don't reproduce and go insane.

Suddenly, people don't have NEEDS anymore! They're not people with families, I guess!