Research Coordinator at @DemocracyR working on @reconstitutEU, "Johnny Rotten of the interface between liberal democratic theory and practice" (@BDStanley 2024)
2 subscribers
The good news: EPP, at least looking at their manifesto, may not be so deeply into the rule of law as centrists are, but still has some important items, such as championing the effective use of the rule of law conditionality mechanism with clear "no values = no EU cash". 2/ 
It's about the draft laws on the judiciary proposed by Iustitia, an association of Polish judges. Iustitia has developed a package of laws meant to restore and improve the Polish judiciary, addressing i.a. the situation of "new" judges and the captured Judiciary Council. 2/
The President of Poland can request the Tribunal to review a bill *prior* to signing it into force. Such preventive judicial review is binding for the President, if the Tribunal finds the law to be compatible with the Constitution/ratified intl treaties, he must sign it. 2/
Following months of deadlock with a group of six "rogue" judges refusing to sit on the bench in key politically-charged cases, it seems that we're having some breakthrough and perhaps today the Tribunal will be able to summon at least 11 judges needed to hear either case. 2/
What Bibi, JarKacz and Viktor have apparently in common is the desire to remove the judiciary as an obstacle to their power. The details between the three countries vary, but the underlying idea is the same – a guy doesn’t want judges and courts to limit his rule. 2/ 
It's apparently an all-American week coming up at Kirchberg, because the second notable intellectual property hearing next Friday involves Bruce Wayne. (h/t: @StevePeers) 
The big one, and hold on to your seats here - the draft proposes to entirely remove the disciplinary matters of judges and the test of judicial independence from the competences of the Supreme Court and to move them to ... the Supreme Administrative Court. 2/
Yes, of course, it's been submitted by a bunch of PiS deputies instead of the government; this way, they can skip all those tiresomely time-consuming public consultations. I'll really need a vacation after this week is done with me.
This is especially important given that this Thursday, AG Collins will issue the opinion in case C-204/21. Of course, as usual, no announcement or reason for the Polish Tribunal shifting the hearing was given, but I'm grateful that I won't have to deal with both in one week. 2/ 
The neo-National Council of Judiciary is dead serious about it and wants a disciplinary investigation to be carried out regarding the food habits of judge Ferek. I sometimes wonder if those people are aware of how this story sounds, but it seems like they're too far gone.
The three judges were moved against their will to the labour and social security department of the court by their superiors - two pro-governmental judges (and MoJ Ziobro's disciplinary officers) in a move that could not be read in another way than harassment. 2/
SAC was hearing a case concerning the Prime Minister's Chancellery refusing to reveal the list of supporting signatures of candidates for the neo-National Council of Judiciary - another element of Polish rule of law crisis. 2/
