@ATMNE_math panel discussions happening now! Being recorded for those who can't attend live.
Thanks @atomic_math!
Looking forward to panel on "Math 4 All" with @carloliwitter @mslailanur & Michelle McKnight
#MTBoS #iTeachMath Michelle: Math 4 All means all Ss see themselves as math do-ers & thinkers & communicators. No obstacles are being set up by us, so all Ss see themselves as "math people"
@mslailanur : Meet all Ss where they are

@von_Oy @anniek_p @Simon_Gregg @becky_k_warren @Trianglemancsd Here's my thinking:
Imagine not round table. There are 6 possibilities if A first, thus 6x4 total.

But ABCD on round same as BCDA, CDAB, DABC. So 24/4=6 ways. Also same as each of those reversed. So 6/2=3 ways.

ABCD, ABDC, ADBC in each, everyone has 2 unique neighbors. @von_Oy @anniek_p @Simon_Gregg @becky_k_warren @Trianglemancsd For 5 people, there are 12 ways.
120 total orders if NOT round. /2 for reverses=60. /5 because if A first same as if any of other 4 first. So 12.

A next to BE can happen 2 ways
A next to BD same
A next to BC same, etc 3 more groups.

@mathillustrated @giohio @khuangedu @dborkovitz My system when I was in classroom was: every test/quiz/lab activity worth certain amount of points. Quizzes 10-30, Tests 50-100, Labs 20-50. Add up all points & divide. Must show work.
Homework complete/incomplete/not done. Then hwk moved the average up or down +2 or - 5 points. @mathillustrated @giohio @khuangedu @dborkovitz The reason for the +2 to -5 range was that doing your homework already helped your average be as good as it could be. Doing it all the time, get a boost. Missing it all the time, take away.
Other systems for hwk seemed unfair (if worth 100 pts, S w/90 would +3, S w/70 +10 etc)