PhD in History. Academic. Polyglot. Father. Resident Expert on Merchants. Attack Dog of the Fourth Reich. Blog: https://t.co/jN1xBZWmH3
6 subscribers
Jul 18 • 14 tweets • 11 min read
Here is you centralised index of 'Holocaust Nonsense' claims with the claims quoted with full references given as well as why they are absolutely moronic.
For example: aside from the infamous Harry Shukman.
Other prominent jews in 'Hope not Hate' include:
Its Deputy Director Jemma Levene (formerly of the Orthodox Union [the Kosher Food Tax organization].
Its Political Organizer Liron Velleman (of the Jewish Labour Movement).
Jul 2 • 6 tweets • 4 min read
Alright since everyone likes these for some reason this is the index thread for my articles about Adolf Hitler and debunks of the various myths about him.
1) Debunking the claim Hitler had jewish/Rothschild ancestry:
Since I catalogued my 'Jewish Invention' debunks for you all I figured I'd do the same for my articles on what Greco-Roman authors had to say about jews (and how much they despised them).
The Poles had spent the last years of the 30s engaging in increasingly violent Polonization, which was documented in detailed by Walendy in 'Truth for Germany' and then refused Hitler's peace deal because they thought they'd 'roll over' the Wehrmacht.
A good example that rips apart the 'Hitler couldn't be trusted' narrative to excuse the Poles is how Hitler almost went to war with Mussolini over his aggressive/violent Italianization policies in the largely German Trentine region in 1935/36.
Jun 24 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
So I did some more digging on Yvette Shmilovitch and put together some extra detail that debunks this narrative:
A) Because she was 95 in 2025 she was 15 in 1945.
B) She was from Romania according to Haaretz.
C) This means she was almost certainly never in a German camp
D) This means - at worst - Yvette Shmilovitch was put in a ghetto or a work camp and required to do war work by the Romanian government - such as helping dig antii-tank ditches - unless she was from Northern Transylvania.
E) She was a graduate of Bucharest University.
Jun 21 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
The reason I don't like 'intellectuals' very much in general is not because I have problem with intellectual discussion, but rather because I recognize that many 'intellectuals' fundamentally have a personal agenda they are trying to push using big words and waffle as a fig leaf
Fundamentally the reason that 'intellectuals' rarely matter is because 'ideas' don't move the world; the most intolerant, charismatic, brave and politically savvy people do because they don't expect to be worshipped because they wrote a 1,000 page book on Hegelian philosophy.
Jun 21 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
Alright so let's suppose the US goes into a war with Iran?
What is going to happen?
1) It will likely be a costly war for the US especially if it launches a ground invasion since Iran is mountainous and extremely hard to control. It is also more than double the Iraq population
2) The jewish/Israeli hand will be extremely obvious - even more than Iraq - which is going to lead to increasing and likely explosive anger against the jews/Israelis from all sides including Trump's base in rural and suburban White America.
Jun 4 • 16 tweets • 3 min read
An interesting bit of historical context around Edith Stein is that contrary to the normal presentation of her as some aloof Catholic philosopher; almost immediately after the Third Reich took power she suddenly started denouncing it because it disliked 'her people, the jews'.
Then in June 1933 Stein promptly tried to use her academic reputation as a Catholic philosopher to get a personal audience with the Pope in order to convince him to denounce the Third Reich and possibly forbid all Catholics from cooperating with it.
May 31 • 20 tweets • 4 min read
One of the basic problems people have with understanding the importance of Lend Lease and the Anglo-Soviet Treaty in the Soviet Union's war effort is that their chronology of 'when the Soviet's starting winning' is off by 1-2 years.
Contrary to a lot of perceptions 1943 was not the 'year of Soviet victory' or 'the year the Soviet's started winning' but rather the period from the surrender of the 6th Army at Stalingrad to Operation Bagration (June 1944) was a bloody stalemate in the East.
May 17 • 17 tweets • 4 min read
This is a common 'Holocaust' trope, but forgets that:
A) Auschwitz waas not one camp but a series of camps (basically 2 main ones plus over 40 known sub-camps) with the 'official capacity' being the 2 main ones.
So - like with Thomas Kues' research into Treblinka - we have records and testimony of numerous jews going into as well as out of Auschwitz to other camps. For example the transport of jewish men on 26th October 1944 which went from Auschwitz to Stutthof.
May 15 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
Very simple.
A) Hitler nationalised the big four German banks and made them accountable to the state (one of the very few nationalizations the Third Reich did).
B) Hitler substantially increased the financial threshold that companies had to be at in order to be listed.
This resulted in a lot of smaller companies being forcibly de-listed because they simply weren't able to meet the financial requirements which then secured them as enterprises so that they wouldn't be bankrupted by stock exchange manipulations since they are the usual targets.
May 9 • 42 tweets • 8 min read
Alright the basic problems with 'Schindler's List' as a film are:
A) Oscar Schindler was a Sudeten German who worked as an intelligent agent for the Abwehr in Czechoslovakia from 1936 to 1939 and then in Poland in 1939 not some random failed 'German industrialist' bribing the SS
B) Schindler was awarded the 'Gold Party Badge' by Hitler in 1939 for his service to the Reich in the Abwehr, which normally only pre-1933 NSDAP members were entitled to wear and as far as we know Schindler was a dedicated National Socialist from at least the mid-1930s till 1945
May 6 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
Let's see:
A) Build a new state structure.
B) Reform the economy and the welfare state.
C) Work towards relative autarky.
D) Encourage pro-natalism and ban abortion outside of very specific scenarios.
E) Deal with the traitors.
F) Rebuild our military power.
G) Incentivize farming as a profession.
H) Create large research grant systems to fund innovation.
I) Re-stratify education based upon ability so that the best and brightest get the best education, while others get an appropriate education.
J) Reintroduce National Service.
Apr 30 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
An example of how badly 'History YouTubers' mangle evidence.
In the Posen speech Himmler states:
'Ich meine jetzt die Judenevakuierung, die Ausrottung des judischen Volkes.'
This is translated to:
'I mean here the Jewish evacuation, the extermination of the Jewish people.'
Leaving aside a more correct translation (which I've seen used by orthodox historians) would be:
'I mean here the Jewish evacuation, the extirpation/eradication of the Jewish people.'
Why does Himmler say 'I mean here the Jewish evacuation' before the alleged 'the extermination of the Jewish people'?
Apr 25 • 22 tweets • 5 min read
This is actual photo not the cropped version of the Ivanhorod Einsatzgruppe photograph which shows a rather different scenario of civilians in a field ducking for cover:
Now some basic problems with the Ivanhorod Einsatzgruppe Photograph:
A) The Uniforms. The 'Germans' have the wrong uniforms on and they appear to actually be Yugoslavian uniforms not German ones.
Apr 25 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
Jake here misrepresents what he is citing - ike the jew he is - since that is the Wannsee Protocol which is merely a list of jews that the Germans thought could be in said various countries based on pre-war population statistics but may have since fled or been deported.
Jake wants to treat it as definite proof but doesn't want you to know that we have long known Wannsee estimates were wrong since - for example - they don't take into account Soviet deportations, the substantial jewish emigration from Western and Eastern Europe,
Apr 21 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
In all honesty I only know what Steve Laws and @ZoomerHistorian have said, but from what they outlined it was caused by the classic siren song of compromise with the political establishment in order to beg the centre for votes.
In truth compromising fundamentals usually puts you at odds with your base - see Reform, Labour and the Tories - which Homelamd appears to have done like so many others before it.
Apr 13 • 13 tweets • 2 min read
Glayde Whitney - PhD in Genetics. Almost completely cancelled before he died.
Roger Pearson - PhD in Anthropology. Only managed to survive because he ran his own journals.
John Phillipe Rushton - PhD in Psychology. Completely cancelled and they are still going after his legacy.
J. Otto Pohl - PhD in History. Almost completely cancelled. @JOttoPohl1
John Baker - PhD in Human Biology. Had his huge book on racial science published by OUP basically memory holed.
William Pierce - PhD in Physics. Almost completely cancelled other than for ADV.
Apr 2 • 15 tweets • 3 min read
One of the silly Libertarian myths about the Third Reich was that it 'opposed the creation' of new companies, which derives from the Reich's 1937 law that delisted small companies from the German stock exchange and prevented small companies from listing in the future.
The purpose of this was part of the Third Reich's economic shift to remove the power of speculative capital to modify German government policy and collapse its economy as happened during the Wall Street Crash.
