2) The Founders wanted the Senate to slow things down, to dampen "passions" as they called them. They never anticipated that a bunch of geriatric, evil, thoroughly weaponized slothmagnets would stop everything.
3) It's easy to think, "Oh, this will pass with another election or two." I say nay nay.
4) Again, the STRUCTURE of the Senate is that to get a working majority of about 60 GOP would require such as massive landslide that even places like MN and CO would buckle.
Jul 8 • 10 tweets • 2 min read
1) This is a thought process in progress, but looking at the last two months of voter registration data, it seems . . .
2) Rs absolutely dominated for 18 months. I'm guessing those voters came from three groups: first, new registrations; second, indies disgusted by Ds; and . .
2) contd . . . and third, disaffected so-called "moderate" DemoKKKrats who could no longer stand their party.
3) In the last 2-3 months, we've seen continued gains in FL, NC, OR, and a couple of other states, but Ds regained a little momentum in NV, PA, and MD.
Jun 7 • 17 tweets • 3 min read
1) Some simple but difficult truths:
2) John Thune is a lameoid douchenozzle. But it was four RINOs, not Thune, who killed the SAVE act. Three of them will be replaced by MAGA this election.
3) If you replaced Thune today with J.D. Vance, & reintroduced SAVE it would fail by 4.
4) Mail-in voting & "Late counting" is a major problem & a serious threat to real democracy & functioning government. But it wouldn't change the CA elections. The problem in CA is TOO MANY DEMOKKKRATS (an at-least 3m voter registration lead).