Mothers are usually more important for language transfer than fathers. Pre-IE societies were also usually less patriarchal than Indo-Europeans.
What we know is that IE and pre-IE ancestry blended, and that language transferred unevenly depending on the society. Why?➡️
Feb 25 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
The correct question is:
Why was central Gaul so cohesive?
The polities of central Gaul grew because they were the center of a system. In the final La Tène period, trade flowed through Gaul, and the central polities became richer. Political consolidation followed…
Elites grew stronger. Towns (oppida) expanded. Political systems solidified, evolving from tribes into nascent republics. Former tribes were subordinated to their hegemons and gradually aggregated into powerful polities.
And then it is the periphery…
Apr 2, 2025 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
Not exactly.
1⃣ Celtic influence may be very old in Iberia, linked to the Late Bronze Age incineration cultures. This influence was strong up to the Ebro valley, but it can be observed even in Lusitania and Galicia. Probably much less in Asturias and Cantabria…➡️
2⃣ In the early Iron Age, Celtic groups in Iberia became isolated from mainland Europe. Pre-Celtic substrata re-emerged: pre-Indo-European in the south and east, Pre-Celtic IE in the west. Celts entrenched in the highlands south of the Ebro valley—future Celtiberia…➡️