How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://x.com/CBCNews/status/1759910776381534275?s=20
https://twitter.com/sambendett/status/1709672471060688929There are many rubrics for assessing military risk. I spent some time in CANSOF where the risk model was "Threat to Mission" & "Threat to Force." The idea was to identify specific risks & mitigations that impacted both the ability to achieve a mission and the actual operators.
https://twitter.com/CBCNews/status/1665699393020874753Let's deal with the easy part. The CAF's standard helmet since '15 is the NP Aerospace CM735. It protects against NIJ Level 3A handgun rounds & weighs 25% less than the previous helmet, but has a terrible suspension system, awkward NVG mount, and doesn't play nice with headsets.
https://twitter.com/AnitaAnandMP/status/1633997911070580737First things first - if you want to know what your government or other public sector entities are buying, the Government of Canada maintains an online portal at canadabuys.canada.ca that allows business (and the public) to review tendering opportunities for goods and services.
https://twitter.com/WarOnTheRocks/status/1620459463701315590The war in Ukraine has understandably thrust modern precision weapons like the NLAW, Javelin, and HIMARS into the spotlight. Countries are moving quickly to replenish stockpiles of donated equipment or acquire new capabilities for themselves.
https://twitter.com/front_ukrainian/status/1624497956593311748The Senator is a protected mobility vehicle designed to protect soldiers from hazards short of direct fire from tanks & AFVs, as well as close calls from artillery. It begins its life as a standard F-550 chassis, and then has a custom armoured body added & suspension upgrades.
https://twitter.com/ukraine_map/status/1588628427560882176First off - what's up with the M117 Commando? Unlike in 🇨🇦, US Military Police perform significant security tasks like convoy protection, which demanded a niche vehicle - something to fill the gap between unarmored HMMWVs and front line APCs/IFCs like the M113 or Bradley.
https://twitter.com/OTDCanMilHis/status/1548401477638467585For as long as I've been in the CA, we've suffered from a centralized system where project and equipment managers at HQ dictate how eqpt is/is not to be used, and innovation is stifled to allow those same project offices to control future capabilities as decade plus projects.
https://twitter.com/CAGlobalAffairs/status/1522569948375048193First off - what is a domain? It's a specific environment in which operations can be conducted. Once upon a time things were simple. The Navy fought in the maritime domain. The Army found in the land domain. The Air Force was just people jumping off cliffs with homemade wings.
https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1503162011076919298Big hand, small map: the US invented the precision-reconnaissance strike complex as a means to counter Soviet mass in the Cold War. AirLand battle was proven effective in Op Desert Storm, and the West has been all in ever since, fighting against an array of 'near-peer' enemies.
https://twitter.com/Murray_Brewster/status/1501138548765962244First off, I fundamentally believe that the form of a military force needs to follow its function, and that any attempt to jam in individual capabilities without proper integration of their holistic role in the force just causes a cascade of shenanigans, so be warned...
https://twitter.com/Murray_Brewster/status/1499366773484834820I've talked a lot about knowing what the purpose of an Army is as the fundamental precondition for designing an effective one. I'll concede that point for now - the flavor of the day is understandably the NATO/Russia context - so lets consider the relevant facts:
https://twitter.com/globalnews/status/1489803043373830146Personally, I feel Russia is going to attack Ukraine, in some form. I find it hard to believe that a build up of this magnitude and cost is just for posturing, and I can't see Putin winning any valuable concessions for his effort through diplomatic means - coerced or not.
https://twitter.com/leahwest_nsl/status/1472593037419233292First off, you need to forget the last 30+ years of Western military technological dominance. The exclusive franchise on precision strike technology, especially, is long gone. All that time we wasted in the desert? Russia and China were making leaps and bounds.
https://twitter.com/CBCNews/status/1466089712809091074Let's talk history. The architecture for NORAD was built over the 1950s when the threat was Soviet bombers sneaking over the Arctic. Through the 60s and 70s it evolved into space-based surveillance of ICBM launches. But lets not kid ourselves here about what the mission was...
https://twitter.com/Murray_Brewster/status/1452960810976915459For the record, I think the media and subsequent comments regarding the A/CDS' statements in October were unfair, especially on soldier forums. The Gen has seen the detailed numbers and knows the chronic & acute problems, but I digress, let's start at the start: