Philosopher of mind, language and society. Runner and radical centrist. Tweets about philosophy, science, politics and their intersections.
Jan 12, 2019 • 24 tweets • 6 min read
(1) The "Grievance Hoax" (GH) by @peterboghossian et al. was not a "human subjects study" (HSS) subject to IRB regulations. Not in terms of its aims, methods, or results. It could not be replicated, nor could it have been published in a journal for such studies. Thread.
(2) Did the GH not undertake to systematically provide "generalizable knowledge" about the editors and referees for the papers and thus about GS? As a comparison, consider a professor who prank-called members of the Trump administration in order to display its incompetence.