@basedwahhabi Well I guess I get why, I believe God is actively compulsively willing every movement but somehow us humans can choose between alternative choices at any point in time, so despite God compulsively willing me to do A, His Compulsion doesn't negate me choosing B, C, this has the
@basedwahhabi Mental appearence of logical contradiction for if a God an Omnipotent is Forcefully Overpoweringly Willing you to do A, how is it possible for you to choose B and C
Jul 26 • 50 tweets • 6 min read
A Rational Critique Of The Secularist Way Of Verifying History (HCM) feel free if I have misrepresented anything to correct me
Reframing the Hadith of Ibn Sirin and the Historical-Critical Method (HCM)
Critics who follow the Historical-Critical Method (HCM) often cite the statement of Ibn Sirin — “They did not used to ask about the
Jul 26 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
Brother Abdul Rahman your right, so I still do not get why you do not affirm similarity between the actual existences of 2 things outside the mind, and that its only a mental similarity. Like if the mind judges a thing to be similar, does that not reflect something about the
objects themself, something about their actual existence, substance, form, shape is like the other? If 2 black balls exist, my mind judges them to be similar or identical due to both having the same qualities, doesn't this reflect the extra mental quality itself having a form,
Jul 25 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
@abuatiyyah_ If I have proof from the Quran and Sunnah of my 'Tajsim' would you grant me excuse of ignorance or do you takfeer all sects regardless of what type of Kufr they commit from Khawarij, to Qadariyyah to even Maturidis as some Asharis consider some of the beliefs of the Maturidis
@abuatiyyah_ As 'Tajsim' (as Maturidis affirm Eternal Pleasure for Allah that is distinguished from Reward and Eternal Anger for Allah and it is distinguished from Punishement whilst Asharis negate both Pleasure and Wrath)
Jul 16 • 41 tweets • 7 min read
@nnnnnnxox @Asympistemic Its not everything in Fiqh or opinions of scholars of the past should be blind followed, but I wish you would pick what Pure Reason and Authentic Revelation dictates rather than what appears to be from Secularised/Feminised Intuitions about Morality which are as unreliable in
@nnnnnnxox @Asympistemic identifying Moral Truth as Communised Intuitions about Morality, or Nazified Intuitions about Morality, or
Pagan-ised Intuitions about Morality, or Raciefied Intuitions about Morality
Jul 14 • 35 tweets • 6 min read
Muslims, the proper way to argue about why it was Moral for the Prophet married Aisha at 6 and had intimacy with Aisha at 9, is first by recognising, whether you give a compromised set of secular reasons, or the true reasons, the secularist will not be pleased with you. Was it
Not the case that the pagans found the idea of worshipping Allah alone disgusting, disturbing. All the Kuffar mentioned in the Quran found the idea of being commanded to worship Allah alone evil and to not worship anything else as disgusting and disturbing, just as these
Jul 7 • 6 tweets • 1 min read
The only way to comprehend what it means for Allah to exist is by analogy with Creation, for if you did not know of Creation which is an existent, you would not know what it means for God to exist. Asharis unknowingly rely upon greek assumptions about how knowledge is aquired
When they ask what does it mean for God to have a Hand, we know this by anaology to Creations Hands and in addition we know Gods Hand differs with ours to some degree. Most Salafis aren't willing to affirm this even when the Prophet literally compared both the Hand of Allah and
Jul 7 • 18 tweets • 3 min read
I’m not consistent in what I choose to believe meaning, sometimes I form a belief because of the apparent meaning indicated by some verses and narrations, and other times like nowadays, I do not
do so because of the possibility
that there are counter verses and counter narrations which if I was made aware of would change what the apparent meaning is of those initial verses and initial narrations, I have come to do this over time
Jul 7 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
I am not consistent in what I choose to believe and I think most are this way, just gradually become consistent over time, people feel the need to be consistent on unverified assumptions which they have yet to confirm are not wrong or right as rarely does anyone go through all
Of the Quran, Sunnah, Statements of the Salaf to confirm a principle which they derived from a single verse of a some verses and narrations, they do not check to verify whether there are counter verses and narrations that can change, alter or the meaning or understanding of those
Jul 6 • 6 tweets • 1 min read
I wasted a decade of my life and more, I did not have to spend my life that way, wandering in ignorance, sure Allah did have a reason for letting me persist in that condition, however He just as easily would of switced His Reasons had I chosen a different path, God's Reasons for
Letting things occur do not need to be permanent, Allah can and has switched reasons before, such as going from wanting to guide a person because of some act they did, to wanting to punish that same person because of a sin they did. My wasting of my life had a non necessary
Jul 5 • 25 tweets • 4 min read
Just because your Shaykh knows a lot does not make him right in everything else, otherwise go and follow the rest of the sects for each get things right, just because your shaykh looks certain about his views, it doesn't make him right, otherwise go follow all the other shaykhs
Of all the other sects for they too are certain about their beliefs. Going to a study under someone also does not make you right in everything, all sects do that too, you must realise this, your more likely holding many major deviated beliefs and will not know, all you can do is
Jul 5 • 6 tweets • 1 min read
If your confused about an issue in Islam, I have come to realise it will get worse unless when all you see are snippets, the best solution is
1. You Read every Verse, Hadeeth, and narration of the Salaf
2. You look through every argument on all sides identify all assumptions.
3. You learn all the Verificational Methods of the past and pick the ones which Allah has obliged by the Quran
4. You Learn The Arabic Language Conventions Of The Sahabah, Or In Other Words, What Did A Word Mean To Them At Their Time, Not At A Later Time, What Did It Mean For
@L1lL3l @abdul_now The argument is highly intuitive, however their response is probably going to be something like, we didn't say random forces created a human in a moment, your example is too instaneous, a hammer smashing glass is known by observation that it will just destroy, however we haven't
@L1lL3l @abdul_now Observed human life when it first originated, so they'll attempt to highlight this to make it appear as if it is a relevant difference, and gives room for the possiblity of extremely slow gradual cell to human formulation.
@threadreaderapp @basedwahhabi @UnrollHelper 
