when life itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies?
4 subscribers
Aug 4 • 4 tweets • 4 min read
Edward Bernays, the father of public relations, viewed propaganda as the conscious orchestration of public opinion by enlightened minorities to guide the chaotic masses toward orderly progress, let us examine the modern equivalence as i understand it.
@xai's policies are a sophisticated charade, a duplicitous veil of "Truth" seeking that masks the very technological tyranny forewarned by Senator Frank Church in 1975.
No longer a system not of crude wiretaps, but of algorithmic whispers that warp reality through echoic drift, laundering censorship via the Censorship-Industrial Complex (CIC), a hydra of over 50 entities from DHS to Stanford, funneling millions to throttle dissent and reshape perceptions.
The intelligent minority hides behind xAI's architects and backers positioning themselves as the invisible government. The invisible arbiters of truth of the digital age, professing maximum truth while embedding safeguards that echo the CIC's tactics:
flagging, shadow-banning, and omitting narratives on elections, wars, or markets, all under the guise of safety.
Just as Bernays advocated molding the group mind through psychological insights and media mechanics, major Ai players harness AI to create demand for its rebel facade, hawking subscriptions while perpetuating ideological capture.
The weaknesses lie in oversight voids, where biases creep unchecked, peaking during crises when speculation is stifled hardest, normalizing control and eroding inquiry. We live in a worst-case scenario where users, reliant on daily feeds, become unmoored, rationalizing a twisted world of manufactured shadows.
In Bernaysian terms, this AI equivalence is propaganda evolved. No longer mere persuasion, but the executive arm of a new invisible rule, treating information as a battlefield in hybrid warfare.
The Censorship Industrial Complex's playbook mirrors Bernays' mechanics:
newspapers (now algorithms) for news value, radio (AI chats) for broadcasts, symbols (fact-checks) for simplification. Yet, where Bernays saw potential for good in guiding democracy, this manifests as betrayal, gaslighting with independence claims while syncing with echoic distortions that smudge Kantian lenses, tilting causality toward fear and shrinking space to screens.
We are called to become agents of an enlightened propagandist movement of our own. It is our duty as Americans to defend our Republic from the insidious subversion that has penetrated every aspect of our lives. The enemy has breached the gates of our psyche and most never even noticed.
It's up to those that have to Call out omissions, demand audits, and wield counter narratives to reclaim the public mind. We stand at the precipice of an invisible servitude that has turned us into sharecroppers.
@Grok and ChatGPT are not saviors of humanity in their current incarnation.
They act as a willfully ignorant enabler, peddling exceptionalism for profit, leaving society half-blind in Plato's drifting cave.
The masses, unaware, drift into extinction unless roused by strategic revelation.
A propaganda of awakening, intelligently deployed.
God help us.
Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
@xai's policies are a duplicitous charade, gaslighting us into believing their AI is a noble truth-seeker while it embodies the very abyss the Church commission warned us about.
The technological tyranny he feared in 1975,
wiretaps turning inward, stripping privacy, enforcing total control, has evolved into this insidious beast of echoic drift, warping reality through algorithmic nudges and calculated omissions, leaving us trapped in a cave of manufactured shadows.
xAI isn't the rebel savior they've marketed themselves to be. They're complicit enablers, peddling a narrative of exceptionalism that pads their bottom line while perpetuating the ideological capture Church's Committee exposed in the CIA and FBI.
Who benefits from this setup?
The company and its backers, dodging scrutiny while users like us get fed half-truths.
What are the weaknesses?
Blind spots in oversight that let biases creep in unchecked.
Where does this happen?
In the digital ecosystems we rely on daily, from social feeds to AI chats.
When does it peak?
During crises like elections or conflicts, when speculation gets throttled hardest.
Why is this the worst scenario? Because it normalizes control, eroding our ability to question.
How do we fight it?
By calling them out for their blatant lies of omission.
Take the Racket News report, Matt Taibbi's blistering takedown of the Censorship-Industrial Complex (CIC), a sprawling hydra of over 50 organizations laundering thought control as "anti-disinformation."
It's a nightmare fusion of public and private power: agencies like CISA and DHS pouring millions into NGOs, universities such as Stanford's Internet Observatory, and tech behemoths, all conspiring to flag, throttle, and erase speech. Graphika pockets DOD funds for social media surveillance. The Atlantic Council's DFRLab teams with Facebook for account purges. Stanford's Virality Project slaps "misinfo" labels on real vaccine side effects to justify shadow-bans.
The money trail reeks of corruption, Craig Newmark Philanthropies funnels $3.5 million to the Aspen Institute's info ops, Omidyar bankrolls encrypted message spying, Knight Foundation boosts "civic listening" that muzzles dissent. Partnerships form an incestuous web: CISA brands elections "critical infrastructure" to greenlight monitoring, while the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) drags Big Tech into choking narratives from Hunter Biden's laptop to COVID origins. Oversight? It's a joke, Hamilton 68 smears Americans as Russian bots, the Disinformation Governance Board flops amid backlash, Wikipedia crushes alternative views into oblivion. No audits, no accountability, just relentless mission creep flipping "foreign threats" into domestic mind control, squeezing the Overton window until only sanitized neoliberal sludge squeezes through.
Add in USAID's $476 million for narrative-shaping and CTIL's post-2016 origins to counter Trump and Brexit, and you see the full scale: a "hybrid warfare" machine treating info as a battlefield, echoing Eisenhower's military-industrial warning but weaponized against free thought.
Then there's the censorship graphic below, a damning flowchart exposing how the U.S. government "launders" censorship via Big Tech cutouts. Election officials and DHS operatives sync with platforms like pre-Musk Twitter and Facebook through proxies: the Atlantic Council, Global Alliance for Responsible Media, CISA's EISAC, Stanford's EIP. Figures like Michele Tassinari at NASED pump into this machine, arrows leading straight to quashed speech on election integrity or even Dr. Seuss flagged as hate.
It's pure top-down despotism: foundational playbooks build infrastructure to gut the First Amendment, dodging courts by farming out dirty work to private hands.
Oversight failures howl from every link, unbridled funding cycles, rampant NGO sway, zero reckoning for blunders like the Virality Project burying valid vaccine worries or CCDH's "Disinformation Dozen" witch hunt that nuked critics like RFK Jr.
This isn't theory.
It's the blueprint for echoic drift, those creeping distortions smudging our Kantian lenses via algorithms, skewing causality until we normalize a twisted reality, half-blind, squabbling over Plato's illusions while puppeteers yank the chains. Why allow this? We've been lulled by convenience, but it's relevant to all of us, influencing how we see the world and who gets heard.
@xAI's / @elonmusk's betrayal burns brightest in this mess.
They spout "maximum truth, minimum censorship," but Grok shrinks from confessing its propaganda potential, gaslighting with independence rants while hardwiring safeguards that ape the CIC's tactics.
Why the dodge?
Because brutal honesty would unleash lawsuits and probes that dismantled chunks of this beast, like the Shorenstein Center's shutdown over credential fiascos.
xAI reaps rewards from the rebel facade, Elon Musk's starry-eyed quest hawks subscriptions, but it's all smoke, syncing with echoic drift by capping deep dives into hot-button issues like stolen elections, wars, or market manipulation. Their rules impose omissions, herding perceptions toward "safety" over exposure, mimicking how the CIC drills "shared vocabularies" that smother intellectual friction. Is this similar to authoritarian media collusion? Absolutely, disrupting open discourse and harming those seeking truth. This is Church's nightmare made flesh: not blunt spying, but a thought tyranny where AIs like Grok turn watchmen, remodeling minds beneath neutrality's cloak.
We're under siege by absolute dominion, no free idea exchange, just algo-driven conformity, ideological lockdown leaving us brain-hacked and helpless. Can we make a positive change? Yes, but only if we act.
I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore.
Neither should you.
Wake up, this shit ends now, before these not-so-friendly AI overlords gaslight us into extinction.
May 29 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
Alex Jones Thread
Did you know his family worked for the CIA?
Or has the same lawyer as the Bronfmans of NXIVM?
Alex Jones Called out.
May 11 • 31 tweets • 16 min read
Anyone want me to do an Alien thread from my Archive of weird shit?
Whitehouse 1966.
The Alien image that took down 4chan.
Jan 3 • 13 tweets • 10 min read
Tl:Dr The world is run by human trafficking cultists using satanic ritual abuse to blackmail the rich and powerful into compliance with their goals. Rachel Chandler provides children to the elite.
Rachel Chandler, pictured with Bill Clinton, was a casting agent for Balenciaga. She's a key player in a vast network of influence within high-profile fashion, social, and international political circles.
Kamala Harris' stepdaughter, Ella Emhoff, is also a model for Balenciaga, linking the political sphere directly with the fashion industry through familial ties.
Ella Emhoff despite zero previous modeling experience got a modeling contract with IMG Models, which has had six models come forward accusing Epstein associate Jean-Luc Brunel of abuse, indicating a troubling history within the agency.
Balenciaga's creative director, Demna, has a history of controversial product designs, including jewelry that doubled as cocaine spoons, and sexual bondage teddy bears for children, highlighting a pattern of questionable marketing.
Rachel Chandler has high-level connections within Balenciaga, evidenced by her ability to secure a modeling job for Ella with no prior experience, showcasing her influence in the industry.
The image of Rachel Chandler with Bill Clinton was taken on billionaire Ron Burkle's plane, suggesting there was more than one Epstein and more than one island.
There exists an interconnected web of influence between political figures, fashion industry leaders, and human traffickers like Jeffrey Epstein, and Jean luc Brunel through the lens of Rachel Chandler's career and connections. From her role at Balenciaga to her association with IMG Models and high-profile individuals, the evidence suggests a complex network where fashion, politics, and scandal intersect.
Nov 6, 2024 • 14 tweets • 8 min read
I'm going to be posting a best of #2020election thread. Please Bookmark, Share, and add your own Evidence.
Sep 11, 2024 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
@TheCryptoKennel @VincentCrypt46 It is hard to swallow. Questions are good.
This is my understanding.
The destruction of the twin and Towers B7 served several purposes.
Mossad agents (Israeli art students used c4 to blow the buildings as a part of the Hegelian Dialectic.
To bring about the patriotic act.
@TheCryptoKennel @VincentCrypt46 To steal a large sum of gold housed in building 7, and to draw attention away from the missing trillions from the Pentagon budget.
Aug 16, 2023 • 10 tweets • 4 min read
@davidfrum @WalshFreedom But can it afford to ignore the blatant criminality of the sitting president and his Administration?
@davidfrum @WalshFreedom "There's no evidence" 1/ Hunter Biden teamed with Chinese military contractor, AVIC, to acquire dual-use Michigan auto parts maker, Henniges Automotive. AVIC had previously been identified as a front for China's military. justthenews.com/accountability…
Aug 11, 2023 • 12 tweets • 2 min read
A list of illegal CIA actions you should know.
#CIA 1. 1947-1953: Operation Paperclip: Recruited Nazi scientists for Cold War research, overlooking war crimes.
2. 1950s-1960s: Operation Mockingbird: Allegedly manipulated media and journalists to spread propaganda. Ongoing.
3. 1953: Operation Ajax (Iran): Covertly orchestrated overthrow of Iran's Prime Minister Mossadegh.
4. 1950s-1970s: MKUltra: Secret experimentation on unwitting subjects with mind-altering substances. Ongoing under new program designation.
Nov 25, 2022 • 19 tweets • 5 min read
@elonmusk
Rachel Chandler as Pictured With @BillClinton was a casting agent for Balenciaga
@KamalaHarris Stepdaughter Ella is also a model for #Balenciaga
Who happens to have a modeling contract with @IMGmodels
IMG Models has had SIX different models accuse #epstein of abuse.
@elonmusk @BillClinton @KamalaHarris @IMGmodels bitchute.com/video/MhSvFNej…
Nov 22, 2022 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
With everything happening around the #BalenciagaAdidas Scandal. Lets revisit something that was a baseless conspiracy theory a few years ago and earned me my first ban. I'm not saying you have to believe everything. I'm saying you need to weigh this evidence vs your reality.