Okay, so I was talking about Di Ceglie's article in Journal of Child Psychotherapy 44:1 (special issue on working with gender identity) bit.ly/2K0DJNw. This piece is intended to 'set the scene' for the issue, so my q. is what assumptions are made in the scene he sets?
Di Ceglie foregrounds concern for his service and career over concern for children who use GIDS. Much of this article focusses on the perceived threat of service closure, the fear of being "pushed over the edge and therefore disappearing".
