"No Teams" = "not slavishly loyalty to any side" (see pinned tweet for demo)
Like/RT ≠ endorse
Wanna know? Just ask!
Mar 5 • 18 tweets • 6 min read
🧵: #Bidenomics has worked better than anyone could've hoped, in every way possible. And by any fair measure, Biden’s economy is better than Trump's economy ever was, before or after CoVid.
(PSST... polls consistently show economy is undecided voters' #1 issue, so please SHARE!)
INFLATION: after worldwide inflation hit, the rate came down faster in the US than any G7 nation, and it's been back to the "target rate" since June 2023.
Jun 9, 2022 • 69 tweets • 26 min read
On January 6th, 2021, Trump supporters—fueled by weeks of lies and violent rhetoric on a “stolen” election—attempted Insurrection to stop the certification of Biden’s win. A THREAD of all the things we have learned about the Seditious Conspiracy that led to that tragic event:
Before we start: the fact that ALL of Trumpworld's lawsuits lost in court would be enough for most to know there's no evidence the election was “stolen,” but if not, here’s Giuliani admitting (under oath) they didn’t even check if the claims were true.
1. "Battleground": ≤10% in 2016 results or 2020 polling averages
2. LV when available, otherwise RV; no A
3. Battleground polls w/3rd party used when available
4. Turnout-hypothesizing versions of polls not used
5. Outliers (10%+ off of average) excluded
Sep 24, 2020 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
MINI-THREAD on polls:
Not that were's approaching the final 30 days, polls are gonna start coming fast and furious. PLEASE remember, it is the *averages* that matter, so don't freak out when you see 1-2 polls that show an undesirable result.
For example...
Today, Siena released a poll that shows Biden +3 in IA, while YouGov released a WI poll with Biden +4.
Demographics alone tell us those two numbers cannot both be accurate, but if you feed them into the averages, you'll get a better picture.
Working a job he's qualified for, unlike Trump's kids. As he was on Burisma board, where he used Yale law degree + 9 yrs as partner in private firm to give legal counsel, and 3 yrs on Amtrak board + investing experience as they moved into foreign markets.
"But he was working in Ukraine while his father was conducting diplomacy there, and in China too!" True, but no evidence of any illegal acts or intervention by Joe. But if that's your standard for corruption, I have some really, REALLY bad news about Trump and his kids...
Nat'l: Biden +9.5 / Clinton +6.8
Electoral votes: Biden 302 / Clinton = 252
This was Clinton's STRONGEST point in the general election: post-VP announcement and Dem convention, while Biden announced VP 4 days ago, convention still ahead.
NOTES:
1. "Battleground": ≥10% in 2016 results or 2020 polling averages
2. Polls with 3rd party candidates used, when available
3. High/low turnout-hypothesizing versions of polls not used
Biden +8.5% nationally, 1.5% higher than Clinton at this point in 2016
BUT Biden stronger than Clinton in 11/16 swing states (no polling for Clinton in ME or NE-2 at this point in 2016)
AND Biden states = 316 EV, while Clinton = 6/15/16 = 211
NOTES:
1. A-B rated polls (per 538.com ratings); RV/LV only
2. Outliers (10%+ off average) removed
3. Lean = ≥4% / Likely = ≥10% / Solid = ≥20%
4. “Swing states”: ≥10% in 2016 results or 2020 averages. Others will be added if polling *average* reaches >10%
May 17, 2020 • 83 tweets • 33 min read
UPDATE (5/17/20) on Reade’s allegation of sexual assault against Biden, considering stories, collaborations, motives, and patterns.
NB: if you ONLY want to hear good or bad things about Reade or Biden, this isn't the THREAD for you!
This is a LONG thread (unrolled versions at the end).
Claims and corroboration considered below.
Credibility, motive, bias, patterns, and making a judgment are on a separate thread:
PART 2 of Reade-Biden (5/17/20 UPDATE): Tara Reade’s credibility and motives; Joe Biden’s patterns; making a judgment.
Thread on claims and collaboration on separate thread, appended to end of this thread.
Motive / bias:
“Pivot I”: Reade’s view of Biden shifts dramatically in 2018, on social media and private conversations (per Politico). Praised his work on domestic abuse (especially the Violence Against Women Act), cancer research, and even his efforts to combat sexual assault.
May 11, 2020 • 73 tweets • 27 min read
All assault claims must be heard, and we must not start with disbelief or victim blaming.
BUT without witnesses or physical evidence, we consider credibility, biases, motives, and patterns.
WARNING: if you’re fiercely pro- OR anti-Biden, you won't like parts of this THREAD!
This is a LONG thread (unrolled versions at the end).
Claims and corroboration considered below.
Credibility, motive, bias, patterns, and making a judgment are on a separate thread:
THREAD on Reade’s credibility and motives, since she is the accuser who bears the burden of proof. Next Biden’s patterns in relation to harassment and assault. Finally, making a judgment.
Thread on claims/collaboration on separate thread, appended to end of this thread.
Motive / bias:
“Pivot I”: Reade’s public comments on Biden shift dramatically in 2018. Before this, she praised his help for victims of domestic abuse, cancer research, and even his efforts to combat sexual assault.
Apr 29, 2020 • 72 tweets • 30 min read
All assault claims MUST be heard, and we must not start with disbelief or victim blaming. But without witnesses or physical evidence, we must consider Reade’s credibility and Biden's patterns.
FYI: if you’re fiercely for OR against Biden, you won't like parts of this THREAD!
This is a LONG thread (unrolled version at the end), but here's a basic "table of contents," if you want to skip around: