Martin “Doomsday” Pfeiffer 🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture
Anthro PhD Cand| nukes, cats, semiotics | gonzo journo |QUEER | RT/Fave/etc ≠agree |he/him|https://t.co/3mPWwG8RiU https://t.co/QvsTbf29ag | NuclearAnthro@home.social
May 5, 2023 6 tweets 3 min read
Good bit from @mjgault on recent Twitter Nuclear War Scares from “certain” accounts.

vice.com/en/article/wxj…

I assess nuclear use by Russia in, on, over, b/c of Ukraine is—ceteris paribus, short- to mid- term—very unlikely.

Twitter RUMINT probs isn’t how we’d learn, either. 2/n

I’ve been reading redacted proceedings of 1969 Tactical Nuclear Weapon Symposium held at Los Alamos.

Hoooooooollllllyyyyyyyu fuck, that is some bonkers shit.

Like, USA ARMY EUROPE saying a report showed it needed 12k nukes for a “tactical” nuclear war in Europe. Screenshot of page from sym...Viewgraph from USA ARMY EUR...
Dec 12, 2018 8 tweets 6 min read
2/n

1972 US NUWEP/NSTAP

1) foundation of US nuclear policy (& nulear deterrence generally) is to slaughter civilians.

Thus weapon assignment (but not use order) priority focused on being able UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES to kill more cities & people than Soviets could (NSDM 16)


Image
Image
Image
Image
3/n

1972 US NUWEP/NSTAP:

2) 1st priority in actual US use of nuclear weapons has traditionally been damage limitation.

Thus notice that in 1972 ALL SIOP ATTACK OPTIONS included and begin with “Task Alfa”: attacking weapons, C3, air defense.

leadership is optional “withhold”
Image
Image