Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק Profile picture
Expert, on political Islam and Jihad. The Quran and Muhammad + historical consequences. Author: The Day After the Iranian Bomb. Jewish, Zionist, Agnostic. MBA.
Jan 1 24 tweets 6 min read
Thread 🛢️
When Zohran Mamdani swore on the Quran, he effectively declared that he hates all non-Muslims and vowed to act for their extermination for the sake of the Islamic Ummah. He will cause any damage he can to New York for the sake of this goal.
Image
Dec 18, 2025 13 tweets 3 min read

A thread 🧵 for my followers from the USA: Islam endangers the existence of your future generations, a danger that is growing and increasing with every passing year.
Nov 30, 2025 17 tweets 7 min read
The United States is facing an increasing and intensifying existential risk that Americans, by and large, completely fail to comprehend. x.com/ofer_binshtok/… x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Nov 25, 2025 7 tweets 4 min read
Research: 803 Million Missing Hindu Souls (700-2025) – A Demographic Audit

The Indian Subcontinent

By Ofer Binshtok

They tell you Hindus are 1.26 billion today.
That’s a lie by omission.

Without 1300 years of industrial-scale slaughter and enslavement, we would be almost 2.1 billion today, bigger than China, bigger than the entire Muslim world.

803 million of us are simply gone.

Tens of millions were butchered in cold blood. Millions more were abducted as children, castrated, marched through the Hindu Kush and sold into slavery. The rest, hundreds of millions, were never born because entire bloodlines were exterminated centuries ago.

This is not a “demographic deficit.”

This is the largest Blood Tax ever imposed on any civilization in recorded history.

Every excuse collapses instantly.

British colonialism?
The bloodletting began in 712 CE, one thousand years before the British arrived.

Climate or soil?
The Ganges plain is more fertile than the Yellow River. China still grew ×29.5 since 700 CE despite worse land. We used the most conservative benchmark.

Only one force ruled the Indian Subcontinent, and never China, for eleven straight centuries:
Islamic conquest, Jihad and theocratic domination.

Carried out through three documented mechanisms:

Ghazwa: ritual holy war and mass murder
Hindu-Kush slave trade: millions of breeding-age Hindus erased forever
Jizya: economic strangulation until conversion or death

803 million Hindu souls. Killed. Enslaved. Prevented from ever being born.

The numbers do not lie.
The graph does not lie.
The blood still screams from the earth.

(See attached graph, the final indictment)

Full forensic report and sources in the first comment below.

If you have another explanation, bring it.

We’re waiting.

Note on Statistical Variance:
Historical demography over millennial timescales inherently involves margins of error due to variations in baseline estimates and modeling techniques across different academic sources. A standard statistical deviation range of ±5–10% applies to these projections. However, even accounting for maximum deviation, the scale of the demographic deficit remains catastrophic and in the range of hundreds of millions, reinforcing the fundamental conclusion of systemic suppression.Image x.com/i/grok/share/6…
Nov 23, 2025 5 tweets 3 min read
It’s Not a Bug, It’s a Feature: The Masquerade of Islam as a Religion

By: Ofer binshtok

This chart triggers a lot of people.

They’ll scream “unfair comparison!”, “What about the Crusades?”, “What about the Bible?”, “But most Muslims are secular now!”

Here’s the answer that ends the debate:

We’re not judging people’s behavior.

We’re comparing the foundational texts themselves.

Christianity and Buddhism have zero political constitution or military doctrine in their scriptures.

Islam’s scriptures are a political constitution and military doctrine, full stop.

Four points, no escape:

1. Bug vs. Feature

Crusades = Christians acting against the New Testament.

Jihad & Caliphate = Muslims acting in perfect obedience to the Quran and Muhammad’s example.

2. The Founder Is the Blueprint

Jesus and Buddha never ruled a state, judged a court, or led an army.

Muhammad did all three, simultaneously, and told his followers to copy him in everything.

3. Eternal Global Mandate

Biblical wars were geographically restricted to one tiny strip of land 3,000 years ago.

Islamic texts command global conquest “until the Deen (Islamic way of life) is all for Allah” – no expiration date.

4. The 1,400-Year Reality Check

Spare us the “that’s just extremist interpretation” cope.

For fourteen centuries, from India to Spain, mainstream Islamic empires expanded and ruled exactly according to those verses. No ISIS required. History itself proves what the texts actually mean.

Prayers and fasting don’t cancel this out any more than a tank playing Mozart turns it into a symphony orchestra.

This isn’t opinion.

This is the operating system, written in plain text.

Look at it.

Really look.Image x.com/i/grok/share/0…
Sep 13, 2025 101 tweets 21 min read
A thread🛢️of over 250 posts and threads, based on the Quran, the Sunnah of Muhammad, Sharia laws, and the history of Jihad, describing the components of the existential danger that the Islamic Ummah, which is a political, colonialist, racist, and violent movement, poses to the non-Muslim humanity, currently numbering approximately 6.2 billion people.
Sep 6, 2025 27 tweets 6 min read
Thread: 🧵
When a Muslim in a non-Muslim society swears on the Quran, as a witness or public official, the Quran's content defines the oath's meaning. Understand this clearly: this oath is a declaration of war against non-Muslims. The Quran's teachings reveal the swearer’s deep hatred and violent intent toward non-Muslims. This thread will deepen your understanding of the hatred and desire to destroy you held by the one who swears on the Quran.
Sep 6, 2025 4 tweets 2 min read
Traveling to the UK today is like traveling to Pakistan, but at a much higher financial cost. The UK is filled with terrorists (jihadists) who support Hamas (at least hundreds of thousands), including their Muslim Home Secretary, who advocates for the globalization of the intifada, which is global terrorism (jihad). Approximately 40,000 Muslims are on the British intelligence agencies' watchlist as security risks related to Islamic terrorism (jihad), effectively an Islamic army. x.com/eyakoby/status… x.com/eyakoby/status…
Aug 9, 2025 19 tweets 4 min read
Thread: 🛢️ The USA will not survive the growth of its Muslim population if it doesn't change its approach and legally ban the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, and all related worship. To understand my claim, I suggest you read and study each post in this thread in depth.
Jul 16, 2025 8 tweets 3 min read
In Islam, there is no concept of 'humanity' or 'human,' only the distinction between Muslim and non-Muslim. Non-Muslims have no place in the world. (Explanation in the attached posts) x.com/ofer_binshtok/… x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Jul 9, 2025 5 tweets 2 min read
In 622 AD, Muhammad migrated from Mecca to Yathrib (Medina) and, within eight years, entirely destroyed the host culture that had welcomed him as a refugee. Muhammad serves as an obligatory role model for every Muslim, in every place and forever. x.com/ofer_binshtok/… x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Jul 1, 2025 10 tweets 3 min read
If you are a citizen of Western Europe or the United States, the only way to protect your loved ones, your culture, and your country from Islamic conquest is to demand that your elected officials enact a law banning the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, and all related worship within your country's territorial borders. If this happens, this will be accompanied by great difficulty and much pain, as Islam will not accept it passively. Nevertheless, there is no other way to stop the ongoing process of Islamic conquest and push it back. I offer this advice as an expert on jihad, political Islam, and crisis management.
Jul 1, 2025 4 tweets 2 min read
The Islamic conquest of Western Europe advances through a gradual process by seizing its major cities, the core metropolises, transforming them into Islamic enclaves while pursuing cultural, economic, and security dominance. Once these cities are subdued, conquering the remaining parts of the countries becomes far easier, as these urban centers serve as the vital heart and nerve center of these nations.Image
Jun 28, 2025 12 tweets 5 min read
Thread 🧵
A Muslim can never be genuinely loyal to a country governed by non-Muslims, as true loyalty to such a country would mean ceasing to be a Muslim. A Muslim is obligated to fight against any non-Muslim country, even if they hold a public office within it, to advance the Ummah's goal of conquering it. Their method of fighting may involve civil jihad, such as undermining the country's resilience and appointing more of their Muslim allies to senior positions, using their position as a strategic weapon rather than engaging in direct attacks. x.com/ofer_binshtok/… x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Jun 26, 2025 7 tweets 2 min read
It’s unclear to me whether you realize that all Islam needs in the U.S. is 5%-10% of the voting population to dominate and destroy the country from within. The democratic system is like blood in the water for a shark when it comes to Islam; Islam has identified the weakness of this system and attacks it wherever it exists. If non-Muslim democratic humanity wants to survive the Islamic assault, it must legally ban the existence of the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, and all related worship.

Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi
Jun 18, 2025 10 tweets 2 min read
Thread 🛢️ - The most significant existential threat to the future of the United States is the growth of Islam within its borders.
Jun 18, 2025 7 tweets 2 min read
Thread 🛢️
The rape culture of non-Muslim women is deeply rooted in the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. It is a form of jihad.
May 23, 2025 4 tweets 5 min read
The Quran Explains Why a Muslim Will Never Truly Be Your Friend, Even the Kindest, Most Supportive, and Friendly One. They May Smile and Embrace You but Are Obligated to Hate You in Their Heart.

By: Ofer binshtok

The Quran imposes a severe prohibition on Muslims forming close friendships or alliances (Auliyâ’), truly from the heart, with non-Muslims, declaring that those who form such heartfelt bonds are deemed akin to non-Muslims, effectively stepping outside the fold of Islam. This is a grave ruling prioritizing absolute loyalty to Allah and the Muslim community and rejecting all those who are not part of this community. Below are key Quranic verses (translated by Hilali-Khan) that articulate this prohibition, followed by an explanation of Surah 3:28, which permits outward friendliness toward non-Muslims in situations of weakness, as part of a broader framework of perpetual war against non-Muslims, reinforced by Quranic verses and Prophetic traditions.

Quranic Verses Prohibiting Heartfelt Ties with Non-Muslims

Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:51)
“O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers), for they are but Auliyâ’ of each other. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliyâ’, then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust).”
➤ Implication: Forming a heartfelt alliance with Jews or Christians renders a Muslim “one of them,” outside the fold of Islam.

Surah Al-E-Imran (3:28)
“Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.”
➤ Implication: Forming a heartfelt bond with disbelievers severs divine support, equating the violator with non-Muslims, except in cases of fear.

Surah An-Nisa’ (4:144)
“O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors or helpers or friends) disbelievers instead of believers. Do you wish to offer Allâh a manifest proof against yourselves?”
➤ Implication: Choosing disbelievers as heartfelt allies is a grave sin, providing evidence against the believer’s faith.

Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:57)
“O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors and helpers) those who take your religion for a mockery and fun from among those who received the Scripture (Jews and Christians) before you, nor from among the disbelievers; and fear Allâh if you indeed are true believers.”
➤ Implication: Forming heartfelt ties with those who mock Islam, including Jews, Christians, or other disbelievers, violates true faith.

Surah At-Tawbah (9:23)
“O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers).”
➤ Implication: Even family members who choose disbelief cannot be taken as heartfelt allies, marking the violator as a wrongdoer.

Surah Al-Mumtahanah (60:1)
“O you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists) as friends, showing affection towards them, while they have disbelieved in what has come to you of the truth... And whosoever of you (Muslims) does that, then indeed he has gone (far) astray from the Straight Path.”
➤ Implication: Showing heartfelt affection to Allah’s enemies leads to straying far from the path of Islam.

Surah 3:28: The Prohibition and the Exception of Taqiyya

Surah 3:28 categorically prohibits Muslims from forming close friendships or alliances (Auliyâ’), truly from the heart, with disbelievers in place of believers, warning that such an act cuts off divine assistance and aligns the violator with disbelievers, effectively placing them outside the Muslim community. According to Ibn Kathir, this is a severe ruling, as true, heartfelt loyalty belongs solely to Allah and His followers, while rejecting all those who are not part of this community.

The verse includes an exception: “except if you indeed fear a danger from them.” Ibn Kathir explains that this permits taqiyya (precautionary dissimulation) in situations of weakness or oppression. Muslims living in non-Muslim countries, where laws are not based on Sharia, are considered to be under oppression, as they are subject to non-Islamic governance. In such contexts, Muslims are obligated to outwardly pretend to be friendly—smiling, embracing, or speaking cordially with non-Muslims—to integrate, survive, and thrive, as failure to do so could lead to a hopeless state of war. A historical precedent is the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, where Prophet Muhammad, in a position of weakness, agreed to a temporary peace with the Quraysh tribe, presenting an outward appearance of conciliation. Ibn Kathir cites Abdullah ibn Darada, who stated that while a Muslim may “smile in their faces,” they are obligated to “hate and curse them in their heart.” This means that inwardly, a Muslim must maintain complete rejection and enmity toward disbelievers, ensuring their heart remains steadfastly loyal to Allah and the Muslim community, never forming a genuine, heartfelt bond with non-Muslims. Taqiyya is a strictly pragmatic, external act, not an endorsement of true friendship or loyalty from the heart.

Perpetual State of War and Permission to Lie

The Quran and Prophetic traditions frame Islam as being in a perpetual state of war against non-Muslims until Islam is established in the world as the sole way of life. Surah Al-Anfal (8:39) commands: “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism, i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the Deen (way of life) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world].” The term Deen here refers not merely to religion or worship but to the comprehensive Islamic way of life, encompassing laws, ethics, and governance under Sharia. According to classical interpretations, this verse calls for continued fighting until Islam is the only way of life existing in the world. Additionally, a hadith reported in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim states that the Prophet Muhammad permitted lying in three situations: during war, to reconcile between people, and between spouses to maintain harmony. Given the perpetual state of war presented in verses like 8:39, the permission to lie during war becomes relevant almost constantly for Muslims, particularly in situations of weakness, as a strategy to survive and advance in non-Muslim environments. This framework broadens the permissibility of taqiyya, allowing Muslims to feign friendliness toward non-Muslims while maintaining internal hatred, as reinforced by the statement of Abdullah ibn Darada.
May 13, 2025 4 tweets 1 min read
Qatar is a tiny Islamic entity, a major force behind global jihad (terrorism), spreading racist hatred and countless murders worldwide. This tiny state severely undermines global peace. It would be better if it collapsed, and I hope that happens in the future. Its leaders should be hunted like the world's most dangerous fugitives. Yet, Trump warmly engages with them.
Apr 14, 2025 4 tweets 2 min read
Thread 🧵
The Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah command Muslims to harbor a deathly hatred for the culture of the United States and the freedom it grants its citizens, and command them to actively work toward annihilating American culture and imposing Sharia law upon it. x.com/ofer_binshtok/… x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Apr 12, 2025 6 tweets 2 min read
Thread: 🛢️
Any culture aiming to survive Islamic immigration must pass a law banning the Quran and all associated worship. This is the only way—there is no other—to withstand the ideological, colonialist, political, racist, and violent aggression promoted by the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. Want to understand my argument? Check out the posts in this thread.