Expert, on political Islam and Jihad. The Quran and Muhammad + historical consequences. Author: The Day After the Iranian Bomb. Jewish, Zionist, Agnostic. MBA.
Jul 1 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
If you are a citizen of Western Europe or the United States, the only way to protect your loved ones, your culture, and your country from Islamic conquest is to demand that your elected officials enact a law banning the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, and all related worship within your country's territorial borders. If this happens, this will be accompanied by great difficulty and much pain, as Islam will not accept it passively. Nevertheless, there is no other way to stop the ongoing process of Islamic conquest and push it back. I offer this advice as an expert on jihad, political Islam, and crisis management.
The Islamic conquest of Western Europe advances through a gradual process by seizing its major cities, the core metropolises, transforming them into Islamic enclaves while pursuing cultural, economic, and security dominance. Once these cities are subdued, conquering the remaining parts of the countries becomes far easier, as these urban centers serve as the vital heart and nerve center of these nations.
Thread 🧵
A Muslim can never be genuinely loyal to a country governed by non-Muslims, as true loyalty to such a country would mean ceasing to be a Muslim. A Muslim is obligated to fight against any non-Muslim country, even if they hold a public office within it, to advance the Ummah's goal of conquering it. Their method of fighting may involve civil jihad, such as undermining the country's resilience and appointing more of their Muslim allies to senior positions, using their position as a strategic weapon rather than engaging in direct attacks.
x.com/ofer_binshtok/…x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Jun 26 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
It’s unclear to me whether you realize that all Islam needs in the U.S. is 5%-10% of the voting population to dominate and destroy the country from within. The democratic system is like blood in the water for a shark when it comes to Islam; Islam has identified the weakness of this system and attacks it wherever it exists. If non-Muslim democratic humanity wants to survive the Islamic assault, it must legally ban the existence of the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, and all related worship.
The Quran Explains Why a Muslim Will Never Truly Be Your Friend, Even the Kindest, Most Supportive, and Friendly One. They May Smile and Embrace You but Are Obligated to Hate You in Their Heart.
By: Ofer binshtok
The Quran imposes a severe prohibition on Muslims forming close friendships or alliances (Auliyâ’), truly from the heart, with non-Muslims, declaring that those who form such heartfelt bonds are deemed akin to non-Muslims, effectively stepping outside the fold of Islam. This is a grave ruling prioritizing absolute loyalty to Allah and the Muslim community and rejecting all those who are not part of this community. Below are key Quranic verses (translated by Hilali-Khan) that articulate this prohibition, followed by an explanation of Surah 3:28, which permits outward friendliness toward non-Muslims in situations of weakness, as part of a broader framework of perpetual war against non-Muslims, reinforced by Quranic verses and Prophetic traditions.
Quranic Verses Prohibiting Heartfelt Ties with Non-Muslims
Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:51)
“O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers), for they are but Auliyâ’ of each other. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliyâ’, then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust).”
➤ Implication: Forming a heartfelt alliance with Jews or Christians renders a Muslim “one of them,” outside the fold of Islam.
Surah Al-E-Imran (3:28)
“Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.”
➤ Implication: Forming a heartfelt bond with disbelievers severs divine support, equating the violator with non-Muslims, except in cases of fear.
Surah An-Nisa’ (4:144)
“O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors or helpers or friends) disbelievers instead of believers. Do you wish to offer Allâh a manifest proof against yourselves?”
➤ Implication: Choosing disbelievers as heartfelt allies is a grave sin, providing evidence against the believer’s faith.
Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:57)
“O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors and helpers) those who take your religion for a mockery and fun from among those who received the Scripture (Jews and Christians) before you, nor from among the disbelievers; and fear Allâh if you indeed are true believers.”
➤ Implication: Forming heartfelt ties with those who mock Islam, including Jews, Christians, or other disbelievers, violates true faith.
Surah At-Tawbah (9:23)
“O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers).”
➤ Implication: Even family members who choose disbelief cannot be taken as heartfelt allies, marking the violator as a wrongdoer.
Surah Al-Mumtahanah (60:1)
“O you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists) as friends, showing affection towards them, while they have disbelieved in what has come to you of the truth... And whosoever of you (Muslims) does that, then indeed he has gone (far) astray from the Straight Path.”
➤ Implication: Showing heartfelt affection to Allah’s enemies leads to straying far from the path of Islam.
Surah 3:28: The Prohibition and the Exception of Taqiyya
Surah 3:28 categorically prohibits Muslims from forming close friendships or alliances (Auliyâ’), truly from the heart, with disbelievers in place of believers, warning that such an act cuts off divine assistance and aligns the violator with disbelievers, effectively placing them outside the Muslim community. According to Ibn Kathir, this is a severe ruling, as true, heartfelt loyalty belongs solely to Allah and His followers, while rejecting all those who are not part of this community.
The verse includes an exception: “except if you indeed fear a danger from them.” Ibn Kathir explains that this permits taqiyya (precautionary dissimulation) in situations of weakness or oppression. Muslims living in non-Muslim countries, where laws are not based on Sharia, are considered to be under oppression, as they are subject to non-Islamic governance. In such contexts, Muslims are obligated to outwardly pretend to be friendly—smiling, embracing, or speaking cordially with non-Muslims—to integrate, survive, and thrive, as failure to do so could lead to a hopeless state of war. A historical precedent is the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, where Prophet Muhammad, in a position of weakness, agreed to a temporary peace with the Quraysh tribe, presenting an outward appearance of conciliation. Ibn Kathir cites Abdullah ibn Darada, who stated that while a Muslim may “smile in their faces,” they are obligated to “hate and curse them in their heart.” This means that inwardly, a Muslim must maintain complete rejection and enmity toward disbelievers, ensuring their heart remains steadfastly loyal to Allah and the Muslim community, never forming a genuine, heartfelt bond with non-Muslims. Taqiyya is a strictly pragmatic, external act, not an endorsement of true friendship or loyalty from the heart.
Perpetual State of War and Permission to Lie
The Quran and Prophetic traditions frame Islam as being in a perpetual state of war against non-Muslims until Islam is established in the world as the sole way of life. Surah Al-Anfal (8:39) commands: “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism, i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the Deen (way of life) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world].” The term Deen here refers not merely to religion or worship but to the comprehensive Islamic way of life, encompassing laws, ethics, and governance under Sharia. According to classical interpretations, this verse calls for continued fighting until Islam is the only way of life existing in the world. Additionally, a hadith reported in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim states that the Prophet Muhammad permitted lying in three situations: during war, to reconcile between people, and between spouses to maintain harmony. Given the perpetual state of war presented in verses like 8:39, the permission to lie during war becomes relevant almost constantly for Muslims, particularly in situations of weakness, as a strategy to survive and advance in non-Muslim environments. This framework broadens the permissibility of taqiyya, allowing Muslims to feign friendliness toward non-Muslims while maintaining internal hatred, as reinforced by the statement of Abdullah ibn Darada.
Qatar is a tiny Islamic entity, a major force behind global jihad (terrorism), spreading racist hatred and countless murders worldwide. This tiny state severely undermines global peace. It would be better if it collapsed, and I hope that happens in the future. Its leaders should be hunted like the world's most dangerous fugitives. Yet, Trump warmly engages with them.
Thread 🧵
The Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah command Muslims to harbor a deathly hatred for the culture of the United States and the freedom it grants its citizens, and command them to actively work toward annihilating American culture and imposing Sharia law upon it.
x.com/ofer_binshtok/…x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Apr 12 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Thread: 🛢️
Any culture aiming to survive Islamic immigration must pass a law banning the Quran and all associated worship. This is the only way—there is no other—to withstand the ideological, colonialist, political, racist, and violent aggression promoted by the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. Want to understand my argument? Check out the posts in this thread.
Thread: 🧵
When a Muslim living in the non-Muslim world takes an oath—whether as a witness or as a public official—and is granted the right to swear on the Quran, it is the content of the Quran that determines the meaning and value of that oath. This thread reveals in depth what his oath truly signifies, and it is crucial that you understand this well. In essence, this oath serves as a blatant declaration of war against non-Muslims.
The Islamic Ummah strives to purify the rest of non-Muslim humanity from the face of the earth until the world contains only Islam, as exemplified by Quran 8:39 and Sahih Bukhari 25, which demonstrate this goal. The conflict over the land of Israel or Gaza is not with the Muslims living there, because in Islam there are no independent national peoples, but rather the single Islamic Ummah to which they belong—just as the Islamic Ummah has a conflict with the United States, Europe, Africa, the Indian subcontinent, and the rest of the world. According to its worldview, anyone who is not part of it has no right to any piece of land in the world, no matter where it is, because everything belongs to it. Anyone who does not believe in Muhammad as the messenger of Allah is considered its enemy, one who must be eradicated, as Allah from the Quran and Muhammad command it.
This is the text for the video:
"Gaza, along with all of Palestine, belongs not just to the Muslims of Palestine but to the entire Muslim Ummah, every Muslim, every Muslim from every corner of the world. Holds a rightful stake in a great responsibility towards Palestine, as with any other Muslim land."
The speaker:
Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril is an Islamic-American preacher, a graduate of the University of Medina in Sharia, and holder of a law degree from Michigan. He gained prominence through his lectures on Tawhid and Jihad, attracting numerous followers who admire his deep knowledge, though he sparked controversy after his 2004 conviction. His words are considered influential among Jihad supporters via social media.
The Enemy Within: An American Muslim Claims - The U.S. is the Enemy of Islam
By: Ofer Binshtok
Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril, whose many followers rely on his vast and profound knowledge of Islam, positions the United States—his birthplace and country of citizenship—as an enemy of Muslims. He asserts that the West, led by the U.S., fundamentally opposes Sharia and Tawhid, listing it alongside Israel and Russia as part of a hostile coalition against Islam’s victory. To him, Islam views the U.S. as an enemy, and every believing Muslim must recognize this. "The army of the Jews is a stone’s throw away with tanks and planes, waging war alongside the U.S.," he says, yet emphasizes: "They achieve a stunning, lightning-speed victory"—a clear allusion to the conquest of Damascus and the fall of Assad through Jihad. He declares Jihad as "the central pillar" of Islam, rejecting any permanent treaty with disbelievers like the U.S., who "will never accept Sharia," as it negates the struggle to impose Allah’s laws. Citing verses such as "And fight them until there is no more fitnah" (Al-Anfal 8:39), he permits only temporary truces. Jibril sees the victory over Assad as a step in the Jihad to establish Sharia, paving the way to defeat the U.S. and Israel—Islam’s primary enemies.
Details of His Criminal Acts:
In 2004, Jibril was convicted in Detroit, alongside his father, on 42 serious charges: conspiracy, bank fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, and possession of firearms and ammunition as a felon. The prosecution uncovered a sophisticated scheme involving the destruction of his properties to collect insurance money, resulting in losses of about $400,000. A mail carrier identified mail sent to over 80 aliases, and fake voter registration cards under fictitious names were found at his sister’s home. Sentenced to 6.5 years in a maximum-security prison in Terre Haute, Indiana ("Guantanamo North"), he was released in 2012 and ordered to pay $250,000 in restitution. These crimes reveal a pattern of criminal behavior that aligns with his views.
Background:
Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril is an Islamic-American preacher, a graduate of the University of Medina in Sharia, and holder of a law degree from Michigan. He gained prominence through his lectures on Tawhid and Jihad, attracting numerous followers who admire his deep knowledge, though he sparked controversy after his 2004 conviction. His words are seen as influential among Jihad supporters via social media.
Part Two: Implications for the U.S. and the Historical Dimension
Muslims in the U.S. who adopt Jibril’s worldview pose a cunning and dangerous internal threat lurking within American society. With his profound knowledge, he makes it clear this is a religious duty for every believer, backed by commands like "And fight them until there is no more fitnah (non-Muslims)" (Al-Anfal 8:39) and "Slay the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them" (Al-Tawbah 9:5), perfectly aligning with Jihad’s practical actions. They live in the U.S. but are loyal to a vision aiming to topple it from within—part of a 1,400-year Islamic colonialist campaign that began with Muhammad’s sword, conquering Persia, Byzantium, and Spain, replacing entire cultures with Sharia. For them, the U.S. is a future battlefield, continuing a patient tradition that waited centuries to seize "infidel" lands. America’s internal security faces a severe threat—not immediate, but as part of a long, calculated historical process that Jibril and his followers represent. They exploit democratic freedoms to grow stronger and plan, just as Islam waited before Constantinople fell in 1453. The victory over Assad proves their plan is in motion, and the U.S. is a future target that could take decades or centuries—a strategy that reshaped the world over 1,400 years and, in their view, will succeed again.
Chapter on Additional Supporting References:
As stated in Quran 8.39: "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)”
As stated in Quran 9.5: “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…"
Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him."
As stated in Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder."
- The concept of Jihad as defined by Sharia law.
09.0 JIHAD
(0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad,
"We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad."
The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:
(1) "Fighting is prescribed for you" (Koran 2:216);
(2) "Slay them wherever you find them" (Koran 4:89);
(3) "Fight the idolators utterly" (Koran );
and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:
"I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah";
and the hadith reported by Muslim,
"To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it."
Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight. himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)
THE OBLIGATORY CHARACTER OF JIHAD
09.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (0: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
"He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad,"
and Allah Most High having said:
"Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each. Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95).
If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.
The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: 09.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year.
The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).
09.2 jihad is personally obligatory upon all 'those present in the battle lines (A: and to flee is an enormity (dis: pH)) (0: provided one is able to fight. If unable, because of illness or the death of one's mount when not able to fight on foot, or because one no longer has a weapon, then one may leave. One may also leave if the opposing non-Muslim army is more than twice the size of the Muslim force).
09.3 Jihad is also (0: personally) obligatory for everyone (0: able to perform it, male or female, old or young) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims (0: on every side, having entered our territory, even if the land consists of ruins, wilderness, or mountains, for non-Muslim forces entering Muslim lands is a weighty matter that cannot be ignored, but must be met with effort and struggle to repel them by every possible means. All of which is if conditions permit gathering (A: the above-mentioned) people, provisioning them, and readying them for war. If conditions do not permit this, as when the enemy has overrun the Muslims such that they are unable to provision or prepare themselves for war, then whoever is found by a non-Muslim and knows he will be killed if captured is obliged to defend himself in whatever way possible. But if not certain that he will be killed, meaning that he might or might not be, as when he might merely be taken captive, and he knows he will be killed if he does not surrender, then he may either surrender or fight. A woman too has a choice between fighting or surrendering if she is certain that she will not be subjected to lin indecent act if captured. If uncertain that she will be safe from such an act, she is obliged to fight, and surrender is not permissible).
Source:
Reliance of the Traveller - Revised Edition.
The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law
'Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices.
Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller.
[CERTIFICATION OF AL-AZHAR]
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, MOST MERCIFUL AND COMPASSIONATE
al-Azhar
Islamic Research Academy.
General Department for Research, Writing, and Translation.
Mr, Nuh Ha Mim Keller.
Amman, Jordan.
Peace be upon you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings.
To commence: In response to the request you have submitted concerning the examination of the English translation of the book 'Umdat al-salik wa 'uddat alnasik by Ahmad ibn Naqib in the Shafi'i school of jurisprudence, together with appendices by Islamic scholars on matters of Islamic law, tenets of faith, and personal ethics and character: we certify that the above-mentioned translation corresponds to the Arabic original and conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni Community (Ahl al-Sunna wa al-Jama'a). There is no objection to printing it and circulating it.
The stamping of the pages of the above-mentioned work with the seal of the department has been completed.
May Allah give you success in serving Sacred Knowledge and the religion. Peace be upon you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings.
Composed on 26 Rajab 1411 A.H.l11 February 1991 A.D.
General Director of Research, Writing, and Translation Fath Allah Ya Sin Jazar [signed]
Muhammad 'Umar Muhammad 'Umar [signed] Seal of al-Azhar [stamped] General Department for Research, Writing, and Translation.
- Can Islam live in true peace with the infidels?
No.
By: Ofer Binshtok
Only Hudna (truces), a temporary ceasefire, is made because Islam is in a weak position against the infidels. Hudna buys Islam time until its power overcomes the infidels, and then it will exterminate them, in accordance with Allah’s commands from the Quran and Muhammad.
*According to Muhammad, Bukhari 1765, the earth belongs to Allah and his messenger, to Islam:
Bukhari 1765:
"…The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: I want this... - He said to them (the same words) the third time (and on getting the same reply) he added: You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle…"
* According to Allah, from Qur'an 47.35, Allah commands the believers, do not seek peace when your hand is uppermost:
Qur'an 47.35:
"…So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior…"
* When Islam is in a position of weakness against the infidels, they have a holy command from Allah from the Quran and Muhammad to lie to the infidels to buy time:
Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called,: "War is deceit".
Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939:
“Lying in time of war”.
The message from Quran 3.28:
Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya.
The message from Quran 16.106:
"...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allāh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..."
* Indeed, Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels:
“Islam is in an eternal state of war against heresy and disbelievers”.
Quran 9.29 begins with:
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah...”
The message is also from Quran 8.39
Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world.
Quran 9.123 begins with:
"O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..."
The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25:
"Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protected…"
* In 628 AD, Muhammad moved towards Mecca with an army of 1,400 warriors, a force that was not strong enough to face the mechanical army of the Quraysh tribe. This is why he signed the Hudna Treaty of Hudaybiya, a temporary 10-year ceasefire with the Quraish tribe. An agreement that was considered humiliating for him since he was forbidden to sign it while mentioning his status as a prophet and messenger of Allah. But Muhammad saw this agreement as a victory that gave him time to break the Quraysh's defense agreements with third parties (Bukhari 2731-2732). Which indeed allowed him a year later, in 629, to also attack the Jews of Khaibar.
* According to Sharia law, hudna is a temporary ceasefire agreement for ten years; this is the only agreement that Muslims are allowed to sign with the infidels:
* TRUCES (Hudna)
09.16 (O: As for truces, the author does not mention them. In Sacred Law truce means a peace treaty with those hostile to Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period, whether for payment or something else. The scriptural basis for them includes such Koranic verses as:
(1) "An acquittal from Allah and His messenger..." (Koran 9:1);
(2) "If they incline towards peace, then incline towards it also" (Koran 8:61);
as well as the truce which the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made with Quraysh in the year of Hudaybiya, as related by Bukhari and Muslim.
Truces are permissible, not obligatory. The only one who may effect a truce is the Muslim ruler of a region (or his representative) with a segment of the non-Muslims of the region, or the caliph (o25) (or his representative). When made with other than a portion of the non-Muslims, or when made with all of them, or with all in a particular region such as India or Asia Minor, then only the caliph (or his representative) may effect it, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence because it entails the nonperformance of jihad, whether globally or in a given locality, and our interests must be looked after therein, which is why it is best left to the caliph under any circumstances, or to someone he delegates to see to the interests of the various regions.
There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. Allah Most High says,
"So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost" (Koran )
Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before its time was up. If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud. It is not permissible to stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does not exceed ten years.
The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax (def: 011);
namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires.
* In 630 AD, Muhammad's power increased; he broke the agreement with Quraish and moved towards Mecca with about 10 thousand warriors and conquered it. The Quraish tribe converted to Islam, and Muhammad abolished the religious tolerance that existed in Mecca. With his own hands, he began to destroy the 360 holy sites for the different religions that lived there in mutual tolerance and harmony. He abolished this tolerance and left only the Islamic holy site.
* Quran 8.58, in fact, allows Muslims to cancel any contract for "fear” that the other party will break it. Not because the other party violated the agreement, but only out of fear. So signing an agreement with Islam is basically meaningless.
Quran 8.58:
"If you are afraid of the treachery of some of your allies, you may disregard your treaty with them. God does not love the treacherous ones."
In conclusion:
As a religious command, from Allah, from the Quran, from Muhammad, and from Sharia law:
* Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels, until it destroys them.
* When Islam is weak, the believers are commanded to obtain a hudna (temporary ceasefire) so that they can gain strength that will surpass the strength of the infidels.
* There is no meaning in signing an agreement with Islam since they are allowed to violate it at any moment.
* When the power of the believers exceeds the power of the infidels, the believers are ordered to abandon the Hudna agreement and destroy the infidels. x.com/Ofer_binshtok/…
- A Muslim must be loyal only to the Islamic Ummah
By: Ofer Binshtok
The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic Ummah, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic Ummah.
The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic Ummah. A Ummah that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic Ummah, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic Ummah will be established—that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic Ummah will replace it.
The fact that the idea of Ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Quran.
Quran 5.51:
"O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers), they are but Auliyâ’ of each other. And if any amongst you takes them (as Auliyâ’), then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust)."
Quran 2.143
"Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful."
Quran 3.104
"Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers."
Quran 3.110
"You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient."
Quran 16.92
"And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]."
Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649:
Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me."
Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167:
"The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." x.com/Ofer_binshtok/…
A short thread about Sheikh Dr. Yasser Qadhi, a U.S. citizen.
Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi on Al-Qaradawi:
"I am somebody who considers myself to be inspired by his writings and who views him with the utmost respect."
Yusuf al-Qaradawi:
"Suicide bombings are one of the greatest types of Jihad."
Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi:
Studied at the Islamic University of Madinah for 10 years, obtaining a diploma in Arabic, a BA in Hadith Studies, and an MA in Islamic Theology.
Earned a PhD from Yale University with a focus on Ibn Taymiyyah.
Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi is the Dean of The Islamic Seminary of America, a resident scholar at the East Plano Islamic Center in Texas, former dean of AlMaghrib Institute, and was previously a member of the religious studies department at Rhodes College. He is recognized as one of the most influential Muslim scholars in the U.S., known for being a prolific author and speaker on contemporary Muslim issues, regularly listed in The 500 Most Influential Muslims, and serves as the Chairman of the Fiqh Council of North America, guiding the application of Islamic jurisprudence in modern contexts.
Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi on Al-Qaradawi:
"Hey, we have a topic, I think, of extreme relevance and importance in light of the fact that yesterday we lost someone who is arguably the most iconic scholar of not just our era, but frankly of our century, somebody whose lifespan literally spanned an entire Hijri century, 100 years. He was beginning his 100th year Hijri years, 96 Gregorian years. And of course the scholar is none other than Sheikh Alama Yusuf Al Qaradawi. And he was without a doubt the most beloved scholar to the largest group of the Ummah. It is factually correct to state that no one of our era rivaled his popularity and respect, and yet still, as with all such figures, he was also the subject of controversy and even rejection by some segments of the Ummah. So in today's lecture, I will, inshallah, try my best to be analytical and factual. I will try my best to summarize the positive and what others claim is the negative and contextualize that and summarize the key points, not just of his biography, but of his legacy. What did he really try to do? How and why did he rise to such popularity and fame? And of course, in the process as well, what did he do that irritated so many large groups of people as well, such that he was banned from many countries? He was on the quote-unquote terrorist list of not just our country but even some Muslim countries and what not. So today's lecture, inshallah, I hope to summarize in 45 minutes or so as much as possible. But I would also like to state for the record, you should be aware, even though I'm going to try to be neutral, I'm going to try to be historical; you should be aware that I am biased. Of course I'm biased. We're all biased, and I have my own position towards this person. And I have said many times, many times, and I'm not making a secret of this, that I am somebody who considers myself to be inspired by his writings and who views him with the utmost respect. And I will be again. I'm trying to be unbiased, but you must know my biases. Because no matter how unbiased you try to be, still your biases are going to be known and shown. So I will confess, and I have no problems in this confession, that I view Sheikh Qardawi to be, if not the Mujaddid of our era, definitely amongst the Mujaddid of our era, and I have been fortunate and blessed to benefit from and be inspired by many of his fatawa, and I quote a lot of times. I will say, oh, this is the position of Sheikh Qardawi, meaning it's my opinion, but I'm gonna quote Qardawi and use him to back up my opinion many times. If you ask me a question, I will say this, and I'm also somebody who has read many of his books, and I was very blessed and fortunate to have a one-on-one audience with him a few years ago where I asked him a series of questions. If we have time, we'll talk a little bit about that as well. So I met him in Doha, and I interacted with him for a few hours. So with that bias put aside very clearly, let us begin summarizing his life, his times, his activism, his methodology, some of his most significant fatwas, and some of the controversial fatwas that raised some controversy."
In the future, Islam will obliterate Christianity in the USA, Europe, and in the Indian subcontinent (where between 30-50 million Christians live), just as it has eradicated Christianity and Judaism in the Middle East and eliminated parts of Hinduism in the Indian subcontinent over the last 1,400 years since its establishment.
- This is one of the tactics that Islam uses to take over the world:
Quran 4.100
“Whoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.”
*Here the Qur’an states the cardinal importance of “emigration for the cause of Allah,” that is, moving to a new land with the intention of bringing Islam to it. See also 4:66 and 4:89. The primary pattern for emigrants in Islamic tradition is the Hijra, Muhammad’s move from Mecca to Medina, where for the first time he became a political and military leader. It is “obligatory” for Allah to reward emigrants; this is one of the Qur’an’s few promises of reward for specific actions (see also 9:111).
Continue to welcome Islam into the Western world with open arms and friendship. Continue to respect Islam, and eventually, it will do to you what Muhammad did in the 7th century to those who welcomed him in the city of Medina. He completely destroyed the host culture.
Quran 9.5: “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…"
Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him."
From Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder".
- Note: This has never changed; Islam continues to operate continuously, in an organized and systematic manner, through Da'wa, fraud, lies, and violence, in order to destroy and conquer Western culture from within.
👇👇👇
The report was written by Tom Quiggin, a member of the Terrorism and Security Experts of Canada Network (TSEC). Concurrent research at the TSEC network includes a methodology project for intelligence analysts involved in the analysis of extremism. A Horizon Scanning project on the convergence of extremist ideologies is being readied for distribution in late 2014.
This project was funded internally by the TSEC network. There is no government, corporate, media or foreign money involved.
KEY JUDGEMENTS:
*Canada has a significant presence of Muslim Brotherhood adherent individuals and organizations. Their values and actions are frequently the antithesis of the Canadian Constitution, values and law. Despite statements to the contrary, the Muslim Brotherhood considers itself above local laws and national constitutions.
*The Muslim Brotherhood’s use of settlement and the “process of civilization jihad” has proven effective. The long term aim is to globally impose a virulent form of political Islam to the exclusion of other faiths or systems.
*Internationally, the Muslim Brotherhood is realigning under pressure as old alliances crumble and opportunities arise. An aggressive posture is reemerging which has used extensive political violence in the past.
*The policy and process of denial is deeply rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood. *Muslim Brotherhood adherent groups should not be given governmental accreditation, access to public grants nor should they have charity status.
*Canada’s stance against Muslim Brotherhood adherent organizations in recent years has been more aggressive than the USA, especially in financial areas.
1. Overview: Settlement and the Civilization-Jihadist Process:
The Muslim Brotherhood represents a greater existential and systemic threat to North American civilization and society than violent extremist movements such as Al Qaeda. The Muslim Brotherhood, self-described by its founder Hassan Banna as a Salafist group, has been entrenching itself in North American since the late 1950s and early 1960s using the process of ‘settlement,’ multiple front organizations and persistent denials. They describe this as a process of civilization jihad. The aim of the group in North America is to weaken and destroy the free and open societies within Canada and the USA from within and replace them with the heavily politicized views of Hassan Banna, Sayyid Qutb and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is consistent with the global aims of the group. This should be of concern as a period of relative moderation has come to an end and the Muslim Brotherhood is becoming increasingly aggressive in its actions.
The Muslim Brotherhood began as a social movement and it still has an extensive program of education and outreach. Dawah (da’wa, da’wah or dawa) and religious education lie at the heart of the Muslim Brotherhood program.
Dawah can be defined as calling or the practice or policy of conveying the message of Islam to non-Muslims. Within the context of the Muslim Brotherhood, it takes on a more ominous tone as dawah is not just the practice of outreach, but it is one of the principal missions of the Muslim Brotherhood as a whole. And by dawah, they appear to include the message of Islam, but the message of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan Banna as is evidenced by the constant references to his life and writings.
Dawah in the Muslim Brotherhood is not just outreach, rather it is an alternative form of conquering a society. Ikhwan Web, the official English language website of the Muslim Brotherhood makes this clear:
The MB shall never forget religious education and Dawah, as they are the essence of its existence.
In the North American context, Zeid Noman made it clear that in the early stages of development of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America, dawah was an integral factor.
This was the first true tremor for the Ikhwan's activism here in America as these brothers started to demand clearer Ikhwan formulas, clearer commitment and means or ones with a specific and not a general nature and that there are conditions to accept one into the ranks of this Dawa'a and to make work secret.
…Some of them came for work and know that this life is a farm for the afterlife and he sacrifices what he has for the sake of. .., for the sake of this Dawa'a.
….Therefore, we had to take two simultaneous moves and with two harmonious wings: The first one is the reality or now attempt to implement the needs of the reality which is what the students' movement needs and that we also work hard to settle the Dawa'a. By "settlement of the Dawa'a", the Muslim Brotherhood Dawa'a is meant. It is not meant to spread Islam as spread of Islam is a general thing and it is indeed a goal for each Muslim in general terms. The second thing is the settlement of the Dawa'a and finding permanent fundamentals in the cities where Ikhwans now live in order to ...er, in order for them to be the meeting points for the coming brothers. (Emphasis added)
In a 1995 speech in Ohio, Yussef Qaradawi, a lifelong adherent of the Muslim Brotherhood movement and one of its key intellectual inspirational figures stated that:
Conquest through dawah, that is what we hope for….We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword but through dawah.
In 2007, some 12 years later, Qaradawi made it clear that his views had not changed:
The peaceful conquest has foundations in this religion, and therefore, I expect that Islam will conquer Europe without resorting to the sword or fighting. It will do so by means of da’wa and ideology. Europe is miserable with materialism, with the philosophy of promiscuity, and with the immoral considerations that rule the world “considerations of self-interest and self-indulgence.
Despite the claims of conquest only through dawah, the Muslim Brotherhood has committed a series of assassinations and bombings in the name of the group. This includes the assassination of a judge in Egypt (Ahmed El-Khazindar Bey, Senior Judge, Egyptian Court of Appeal) in 194816 as well as the attempted assassination of President Nasser in 1954. The Syrian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood was engaged in a violent campaign from 1976 to 1982 which included a 1979 attack against students at the military academy in Aleppo. Most of the students killed were from the leadership Alawite group and the victims were largely the sons of various regime officials. The campaign ended with a brutal government massacre of Muslim Brotherhood supporters in the town of Hama. Currently, the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood (HAMAS) remains committed to violence and has worked against peace efforts such as the Oslo Accords.
In addition to Dawah, another feature of the Muslim Brotherhood is the concept of the Islamization of Knowledge, conceptualized in part by former Montreal resident Dr. Ismail Faruqi. In his book Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan, Dr. Faruqi argues that there was a need to:
…recast the whole legacy of human knowledge from the stand point of Islam. He presented 12 workplan aims to produce university level textbooks recasting some twenty disciplines in accordance to the Islamic vision because of the backward and lowly contemporary position of the ummah in all fields, political, economic, and religio-cultural.
While presenting itself as a voice of moderation, the Muslim Brotherhood is an adherent of an 85+ year old policy of establishing the Brotherhood’s brand of Islam as the global faith at the exclusion of all other religions and secular forms of organization. Other Muslim groups that do not adhere are subjected to scorn and abuse. The Muslim Brotherhood has wavered on the use of violence, sometimes presenting itself as a political movement that expels those who use violence. On other occasions it does military training at local camps and uses assassinations and bombings. Foreign funding and foreign organizational assistance have been the hallmarks of many of the adherent charities and organizations.
In 1991, the Muslim Brotherhood in North America issued An Explanatory Memorandum on the General
Strategic Goal for the Group in North America (5/22/1991).”
The document was presented by Mohamed Akram (A.K.A. Mohammad Akram Al-Adlouni) who is now the Secretary General of al-Quds International located in Lebanon. The chairman of the board of trustees is identified as Qatar based28 Youssef Qaradawi. According to Akram, it was the result of five years of policy review work which was proceeded by some 20 years of organizational activity. It was finally approved their Shura Council. In section 4 of the 1991 Explanatory Memorandum, which is subtitled Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America, the document points out that:
The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions.
It is not an analytically acceptable practice to take one data point, such as the above, and then assess that the organization is always committed to this goal. To be clear, however, a remarkable degree of consistency of beliefs and goals exists across a range of Muslim Brotherhood organizations – both temporally and geographically. The most recent examples mimic those of a more violent past. The phase of moving away from violence appears to be ending/has ended and the organisation as a whole is becoming more aggressive and expresses an inflexible approach with violent overtones. In 2010 the Muslim Brotherhood’s General Guide Mohamed Badie claimed that the “Muslim and Arab Regimes are Disregarding Allah's Commandment to Wage Jihad" and that change can occur by raising a jihadi generation that pursues death just as the enemies pursue life. He notes that resistance is the only solution. These comments appear similar to those of Salah Sultan of Ohio (ISNA, Fiqh Council , MAS) who says that America will suffer economic stagnation, ruin, destruction and crime which will surpass what is happening in Gaza. He also noted that the US will suffer more deaths than all of those killed in the third Gaza holocaust and that it will happen soon. Both of these statements by influential Muslim Brotherhood leaders appear as informal declarations of war, similar to those of al Qaeda in 1996 and 1998.
Egyptian President (2012-2013) and Muslim Brotherhood member Mohammed Morsi’s attempted project to ‘Brotherhoodize’ Egypt (The Nahda or Renaissance Project) was a sign of recent intentions. By granting himself near dictatorial powers38 followed by his attacks on the press/TV and the judiciary, he demonstrated that he was more of a servant of the Muslim Brotherhood and Khairat alShater’s Nahda Project43 than he was the leader of Egypt. Al-Shater had envisaged the Nahda Project as instituting “the religion of God; the Islamization of life, empowering of God’s religion.”
Ironically, Dr. Morsi was recruited into the Muslim Brotherhood while studying in North America (PhD, USC, 1992). He graduated the year after the 1991 General Memorandum outlined the role of civilization-jihadist project in North America.
Thread: 🧵
The murderers of Salwan Momika followed the example of Muhammad, who dispatched assassins to murder his critics. Today, the streets of Western Europe, the USA, and Canada are teeming with millions who echo this mentality. They have openly demonstrated their support for Hamas and Hezbollah.
The Greatest Genocide in History
The Hindus and the Indian subcontinent as a parable for all humanity: Over a period of 1300 years till today, the Islamic invaders of the Hindu subcontinent waged a brutal jihad war against the Hindus, which shaped a reality in the subcontinent where there are now 1.1 billion Hindus vs. 600 million Muslims. This picture of reality must serve as a cautionary tale for all of humanity. Islam aims to make Pakistan and Bangladesh, which are part of the Indian subcontinent, into places containing only Muslims (Qur'an 8.39). It would also do the same in what is now known as Bharat (India), an area that remains today with a Hindu majority. x.com/Ofer_binshtok/……
If not stopped entirely, in approximately 500 years, the Islamic invasion of the USA will mirror what is seen in the Indian subcontinent. This will be a brutal and painful process for non-Muslims living in the USA. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
x.com/ofer_binshtok/…x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Jan 11 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
Thread: 🧵
In the 7th century, about 1400 years ago, Muhammad was the founder and leader of the first gang of rapist jihadists (known as the grooming gang). According to Quran 33:21, Muhammad serves as an excellent role model for every Muslim.
