Expert, on political Islam and Jihad. The Quran and Muhammad + historical consequences. Author: The Day After the Iranian Bomb. Jewish, Zionist, Agnostic. MBA.
Nov 25 • 6 tweets • 4 min read
Research: 803 Million Missing Hindu Souls (700-2025) – A Demographic Audit
The Indian Subcontinent
By Ofer Binshtok
They tell you Hindus are 1.26 billion today.
That’s a lie by omission.
Without 1300 years of industrial-scale slaughter and enslavement, we would be almost 2.1 billion today, bigger than China, bigger than the entire Muslim world.
803 million of us are simply gone.
Tens of millions were butchered in cold blood. Millions more were abducted as children, castrated, marched through the Hindu Kush and sold into slavery. The rest, hundreds of millions, were never born because entire bloodlines were exterminated centuries ago.
This is not a “demographic deficit.”
This is the largest Blood Tax ever imposed on any civilization in recorded history.
Every excuse collapses instantly.
British colonialism?
The bloodletting began in 712 CE, one thousand years before the British arrived.
Climate or soil?
The Ganges plain is more fertile than the Yellow River. China still grew ×29.5 since 700 CE despite worse land. We used the most conservative benchmark.
Only one force ruled the Indian Subcontinent, and never China, for eleven straight centuries:
Islamic conquest, Jihad and theocratic domination.
Carried out through three documented mechanisms:
Ghazwa: ritual holy war and mass murder
Hindu-Kush slave trade: millions of breeding-age Hindus erased forever
Jizya: economic strangulation until conversion or death
803 million Hindu souls. Killed. Enslaved. Prevented from ever being born.
The numbers do not lie.
The graph does not lie.
The blood still screams from the earth.
(See attached graph, the final indictment)
Full forensic report and sources in the first comment below.
If you have another explanation, bring it.
We’re waiting.
Note on Statistical Variance:
Historical demography over millennial timescales inherently involves margins of error due to variations in baseline estimates and modeling techniques across different academic sources. A standard statistical deviation range of ±5–10% applies to these projections. However, even accounting for maximum deviation, the scale of the demographic deficit remains catastrophic and in the range of hundreds of millions, reinforcing the fundamental conclusion of systemic suppression.x.com/i/grok/share/6…
Sep 13 • 101 tweets • 21 min read
A thread🛢️of over 250 posts and threads, based on the Quran, the Sunnah of Muhammad, Sharia laws, and the history of Jihad, describing the components of the existential danger that the Islamic Ummah, which is a political, colonialist, racist, and violent movement, poses to the non-Muslim humanity, currently numbering approximately 6.2 billion people.
Thread: 🧵
When a Muslim in a non-Muslim society swears on the Quran, as a witness or public official, the Quran's content defines the oath's meaning. Understand this clearly: this oath is a declaration of war against non-Muslims. The Quran's teachings reveal the swearer’s deep hatred and violent intent toward non-Muslims. This thread will deepen your understanding of the hatred and desire to destroy you held by the one who swears on the Quran.
Traveling to the UK today is like traveling to Pakistan, but at a much higher financial cost. The UK is filled with terrorists (jihadists) who support Hamas (at least hundreds of thousands), including their Muslim Home Secretary, who advocates for the globalization of the intifada, which is global terrorism (jihad). Approximately 40,000 Muslims are on the British intelligence agencies' watchlist as security risks related to Islamic terrorism (jihad), effectively an Islamic army.
x.com/eyakoby/status…x.com/eyakoby/status…
Aug 9 • 19 tweets • 4 min read
Thread: 🛢️ The USA will not survive the growth of its Muslim population if it doesn't change its approach and legally ban the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, and all related worship. To understand my claim, I suggest you read and study each post in this thread in depth.
In Islam, there is no concept of 'humanity' or 'human,' only the distinction between Muslim and non-Muslim. Non-Muslims have no place in the world. (Explanation in the attached posts)
x.com/ofer_binshtok/…x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Jul 9 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
In 622 AD, Muhammad migrated from Mecca to Yathrib (Medina) and, within eight years, entirely destroyed the host culture that had welcomed him as a refugee. Muhammad serves as an obligatory role model for every Muslim, in every place and forever.
x.com/ofer_binshtok/…x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Jul 1 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
If you are a citizen of Western Europe or the United States, the only way to protect your loved ones, your culture, and your country from Islamic conquest is to demand that your elected officials enact a law banning the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, and all related worship within your country's territorial borders. If this happens, this will be accompanied by great difficulty and much pain, as Islam will not accept it passively. Nevertheless, there is no other way to stop the ongoing process of Islamic conquest and push it back. I offer this advice as an expert on jihad, political Islam, and crisis management.
The Islamic conquest of Western Europe advances through a gradual process by seizing its major cities, the core metropolises, transforming them into Islamic enclaves while pursuing cultural, economic, and security dominance. Once these cities are subdued, conquering the remaining parts of the countries becomes far easier, as these urban centers serve as the vital heart and nerve center of these nations.
Thread 🧵
A Muslim can never be genuinely loyal to a country governed by non-Muslims, as true loyalty to such a country would mean ceasing to be a Muslim. A Muslim is obligated to fight against any non-Muslim country, even if they hold a public office within it, to advance the Ummah's goal of conquering it. Their method of fighting may involve civil jihad, such as undermining the country's resilience and appointing more of their Muslim allies to senior positions, using their position as a strategic weapon rather than engaging in direct attacks.
x.com/ofer_binshtok/…x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Jun 26 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
It’s unclear to me whether you realize that all Islam needs in the U.S. is 5%-10% of the voting population to dominate and destroy the country from within. The democratic system is like blood in the water for a shark when it comes to Islam; Islam has identified the weakness of this system and attacks it wherever it exists. If non-Muslim democratic humanity wants to survive the Islamic assault, it must legally ban the existence of the Quran, Muhammad's Sunnah, and all related worship.
The Quran Explains Why a Muslim Will Never Truly Be Your Friend, Even the Kindest, Most Supportive, and Friendly One. They May Smile and Embrace You but Are Obligated to Hate You in Their Heart.
By: Ofer binshtok
The Quran imposes a severe prohibition on Muslims forming close friendships or alliances (Auliyâ’), truly from the heart, with non-Muslims, declaring that those who form such heartfelt bonds are deemed akin to non-Muslims, effectively stepping outside the fold of Islam. This is a grave ruling prioritizing absolute loyalty to Allah and the Muslim community and rejecting all those who are not part of this community. Below are key Quranic verses (translated by Hilali-Khan) that articulate this prohibition, followed by an explanation of Surah 3:28, which permits outward friendliness toward non-Muslims in situations of weakness, as part of a broader framework of perpetual war against non-Muslims, reinforced by Quranic verses and Prophetic traditions.
Quranic Verses Prohibiting Heartfelt Ties with Non-Muslims
Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:51)
“O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers), for they are but Auliyâ’ of each other. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliyâ’, then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust).”
➤ Implication: Forming a heartfelt alliance with Jews or Christians renders a Muslim “one of them,” outside the fold of Islam.
Surah Al-E-Imran (3:28)
“Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.”
➤ Implication: Forming a heartfelt bond with disbelievers severs divine support, equating the violator with non-Muslims, except in cases of fear.
Surah An-Nisa’ (4:144)
“O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors or helpers or friends) disbelievers instead of believers. Do you wish to offer Allâh a manifest proof against yourselves?”
➤ Implication: Choosing disbelievers as heartfelt allies is a grave sin, providing evidence against the believer’s faith.
Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:57)
“O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors and helpers) those who take your religion for a mockery and fun from among those who received the Scripture (Jews and Christians) before you, nor from among the disbelievers; and fear Allâh if you indeed are true believers.”
➤ Implication: Forming heartfelt ties with those who mock Islam, including Jews, Christians, or other disbelievers, violates true faith.
Surah At-Tawbah (9:23)
“O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers).”
➤ Implication: Even family members who choose disbelief cannot be taken as heartfelt allies, marking the violator as a wrongdoer.
Surah Al-Mumtahanah (60:1)
“O you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists) as friends, showing affection towards them, while they have disbelieved in what has come to you of the truth... And whosoever of you (Muslims) does that, then indeed he has gone (far) astray from the Straight Path.”
➤ Implication: Showing heartfelt affection to Allah’s enemies leads to straying far from the path of Islam.
Surah 3:28: The Prohibition and the Exception of Taqiyya
Surah 3:28 categorically prohibits Muslims from forming close friendships or alliances (Auliyâ’), truly from the heart, with disbelievers in place of believers, warning that such an act cuts off divine assistance and aligns the violator with disbelievers, effectively placing them outside the Muslim community. According to Ibn Kathir, this is a severe ruling, as true, heartfelt loyalty belongs solely to Allah and His followers, while rejecting all those who are not part of this community.
The verse includes an exception: “except if you indeed fear a danger from them.” Ibn Kathir explains that this permits taqiyya (precautionary dissimulation) in situations of weakness or oppression. Muslims living in non-Muslim countries, where laws are not based on Sharia, are considered to be under oppression, as they are subject to non-Islamic governance. In such contexts, Muslims are obligated to outwardly pretend to be friendly—smiling, embracing, or speaking cordially with non-Muslims—to integrate, survive, and thrive, as failure to do so could lead to a hopeless state of war. A historical precedent is the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, where Prophet Muhammad, in a position of weakness, agreed to a temporary peace with the Quraysh tribe, presenting an outward appearance of conciliation. Ibn Kathir cites Abdullah ibn Darada, who stated that while a Muslim may “smile in their faces,” they are obligated to “hate and curse them in their heart.” This means that inwardly, a Muslim must maintain complete rejection and enmity toward disbelievers, ensuring their heart remains steadfastly loyal to Allah and the Muslim community, never forming a genuine, heartfelt bond with non-Muslims. Taqiyya is a strictly pragmatic, external act, not an endorsement of true friendship or loyalty from the heart.
Perpetual State of War and Permission to Lie
The Quran and Prophetic traditions frame Islam as being in a perpetual state of war against non-Muslims until Islam is established in the world as the sole way of life. Surah Al-Anfal (8:39) commands: “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism, i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the Deen (way of life) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world].” The term Deen here refers not merely to religion or worship but to the comprehensive Islamic way of life, encompassing laws, ethics, and governance under Sharia. According to classical interpretations, this verse calls for continued fighting until Islam is the only way of life existing in the world. Additionally, a hadith reported in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim states that the Prophet Muhammad permitted lying in three situations: during war, to reconcile between people, and between spouses to maintain harmony. Given the perpetual state of war presented in verses like 8:39, the permission to lie during war becomes relevant almost constantly for Muslims, particularly in situations of weakness, as a strategy to survive and advance in non-Muslim environments. This framework broadens the permissibility of taqiyya, allowing Muslims to feign friendliness toward non-Muslims while maintaining internal hatred, as reinforced by the statement of Abdullah ibn Darada.
Qatar is a tiny Islamic entity, a major force behind global jihad (terrorism), spreading racist hatred and countless murders worldwide. This tiny state severely undermines global peace. It would be better if it collapsed, and I hope that happens in the future. Its leaders should be hunted like the world's most dangerous fugitives. Yet, Trump warmly engages with them.
Thread 🧵
The Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah command Muslims to harbor a deathly hatred for the culture of the United States and the freedom it grants its citizens, and command them to actively work toward annihilating American culture and imposing Sharia law upon it.
x.com/ofer_binshtok/…x.com/ofer_binshtok/…
Apr 12 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Thread: 🛢️
Any culture aiming to survive Islamic immigration must pass a law banning the Quran and all associated worship. This is the only way—there is no other—to withstand the ideological, colonialist, political, racist, and violent aggression promoted by the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. Want to understand my argument? Check out the posts in this thread.
Thread: 🧵
When a Muslim living in the non-Muslim world takes an oath—whether as a witness or as a public official—and is granted the right to swear on the Quran, it is the content of the Quran that determines the meaning and value of that oath. This thread reveals in depth what his oath truly signifies, and it is crucial that you understand this well. In essence, this oath serves as a blatant declaration of war against non-Muslims.
The Islamic Ummah strives to purify the rest of non-Muslim humanity from the face of the earth until the world contains only Islam, as exemplified by Quran 8:39 and Sahih Bukhari 25, which demonstrate this goal. The conflict over the land of Israel or Gaza is not with the Muslims living there, because in Islam there are no independent national peoples, but rather the single Islamic Ummah to which they belong—just as the Islamic Ummah has a conflict with the United States, Europe, Africa, the Indian subcontinent, and the rest of the world. According to its worldview, anyone who is not part of it has no right to any piece of land in the world, no matter where it is, because everything belongs to it. Anyone who does not believe in Muhammad as the messenger of Allah is considered its enemy, one who must be eradicated, as Allah from the Quran and Muhammad command it.
This is the text for the video:
"Gaza, along with all of Palestine, belongs not just to the Muslims of Palestine but to the entire Muslim Ummah, every Muslim, every Muslim from every corner of the world. Holds a rightful stake in a great responsibility towards Palestine, as with any other Muslim land."
The speaker:
Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril is an Islamic-American preacher, a graduate of the University of Medina in Sharia, and holder of a law degree from Michigan. He gained prominence through his lectures on Tawhid and Jihad, attracting numerous followers who admire his deep knowledge, though he sparked controversy after his 2004 conviction. His words are considered influential among Jihad supporters via social media.
The Enemy Within: An American Muslim Claims - The U.S. is the Enemy of Islam
By: Ofer Binshtok
Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril, whose many followers rely on his vast and profound knowledge of Islam, positions the United States—his birthplace and country of citizenship—as an enemy of Muslims. He asserts that the West, led by the U.S., fundamentally opposes Sharia and Tawhid, listing it alongside Israel and Russia as part of a hostile coalition against Islam’s victory. To him, Islam views the U.S. as an enemy, and every believing Muslim must recognize this. "The army of the Jews is a stone’s throw away with tanks and planes, waging war alongside the U.S.," he says, yet emphasizes: "They achieve a stunning, lightning-speed victory"—a clear allusion to the conquest of Damascus and the fall of Assad through Jihad. He declares Jihad as "the central pillar" of Islam, rejecting any permanent treaty with disbelievers like the U.S., who "will never accept Sharia," as it negates the struggle to impose Allah’s laws. Citing verses such as "And fight them until there is no more fitnah" (Al-Anfal 8:39), he permits only temporary truces. Jibril sees the victory over Assad as a step in the Jihad to establish Sharia, paving the way to defeat the U.S. and Israel—Islam’s primary enemies.
Details of His Criminal Acts:
In 2004, Jibril was convicted in Detroit, alongside his father, on 42 serious charges: conspiracy, bank fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, and possession of firearms and ammunition as a felon. The prosecution uncovered a sophisticated scheme involving the destruction of his properties to collect insurance money, resulting in losses of about $400,000. A mail carrier identified mail sent to over 80 aliases, and fake voter registration cards under fictitious names were found at his sister’s home. Sentenced to 6.5 years in a maximum-security prison in Terre Haute, Indiana ("Guantanamo North"), he was released in 2012 and ordered to pay $250,000 in restitution. These crimes reveal a pattern of criminal behavior that aligns with his views.
Background:
Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril is an Islamic-American preacher, a graduate of the University of Medina in Sharia, and holder of a law degree from Michigan. He gained prominence through his lectures on Tawhid and Jihad, attracting numerous followers who admire his deep knowledge, though he sparked controversy after his 2004 conviction. His words are seen as influential among Jihad supporters via social media.
Part Two: Implications for the U.S. and the Historical Dimension
Muslims in the U.S. who adopt Jibril’s worldview pose a cunning and dangerous internal threat lurking within American society. With his profound knowledge, he makes it clear this is a religious duty for every believer, backed by commands like "And fight them until there is no more fitnah (non-Muslims)" (Al-Anfal 8:39) and "Slay the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them" (Al-Tawbah 9:5), perfectly aligning with Jihad’s practical actions. They live in the U.S. but are loyal to a vision aiming to topple it from within—part of a 1,400-year Islamic colonialist campaign that began with Muhammad’s sword, conquering Persia, Byzantium, and Spain, replacing entire cultures with Sharia. For them, the U.S. is a future battlefield, continuing a patient tradition that waited centuries to seize "infidel" lands. America’s internal security faces a severe threat—not immediate, but as part of a long, calculated historical process that Jibril and his followers represent. They exploit democratic freedoms to grow stronger and plan, just as Islam waited before Constantinople fell in 1453. The victory over Assad proves their plan is in motion, and the U.S. is a future target that could take decades or centuries—a strategy that reshaped the world over 1,400 years and, in their view, will succeed again.
Chapter on Additional Supporting References:
As stated in Quran 8.39: "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)”
As stated in Quran 9.5: “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…"
Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him."
As stated in Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder."
- The concept of Jihad as defined by Sharia law.
09.0 JIHAD
(0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad,
"We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad."
The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:
(1) "Fighting is prescribed for you" (Koran 2:216);
(2) "Slay them wherever you find them" (Koran 4:89);
(3) "Fight the idolators utterly" (Koran );
and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:
"I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah";
and the hadith reported by Muslim,
"To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it."
Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight. himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)
THE OBLIGATORY CHARACTER OF JIHAD
09.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (0: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
"He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad,"
and Allah Most High having said:
"Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each. Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95).
If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.
The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: 09.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year.
The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).
09.2 jihad is personally obligatory upon all 'those present in the battle lines (A: and to flee is an enormity (dis: pH)) (0: provided one is able to fight. If unable, because of illness or the death of one's mount when not able to fight on foot, or because one no longer has a weapon, then one may leave. One may also leave if the opposing non-Muslim army is more than twice the size of the Muslim force).
09.3 Jihad is also (0: personally) obligatory for everyone (0: able to perform it, male or female, old or young) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims (0: on every side, having entered our territory, even if the land consists of ruins, wilderness, or mountains, for non-Muslim forces entering Muslim lands is a weighty matter that cannot be ignored, but must be met with effort and struggle to repel them by every possible means. All of which is if conditions permit gathering (A: the above-mentioned) people, provisioning them, and readying them for war. If conditions do not permit this, as when the enemy has overrun the Muslims such that they are unable to provision or prepare themselves for war, then whoever is found by a non-Muslim and knows he will be killed if captured is obliged to defend himself in whatever way possible. But if not certain that he will be killed, meaning that he might or might not be, as when he might merely be taken captive, and he knows he will be killed if he does not surrender, then he may either surrender or fight. A woman too has a choice between fighting or surrendering if she is certain that she will not be subjected to lin indecent act if captured. If uncertain that she will be safe from such an act, she is obliged to fight, and surrender is not permissible).
Source:
Reliance of the Traveller - Revised Edition.
The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law
'Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices.
Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller.
[CERTIFICATION OF AL-AZHAR]
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, MOST MERCIFUL AND COMPASSIONATE
al-Azhar
Islamic Research Academy.
General Department for Research, Writing, and Translation.
Mr, Nuh Ha Mim Keller.
Amman, Jordan.
Peace be upon you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings.
To commence: In response to the request you have submitted concerning the examination of the English translation of the book 'Umdat al-salik wa 'uddat alnasik by Ahmad ibn Naqib in the Shafi'i school of jurisprudence, together with appendices by Islamic scholars on matters of Islamic law, tenets of faith, and personal ethics and character: we certify that the above-mentioned translation corresponds to the Arabic original and conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni Community (Ahl al-Sunna wa al-Jama'a). There is no objection to printing it and circulating it.
The stamping of the pages of the above-mentioned work with the seal of the department has been completed.
May Allah give you success in serving Sacred Knowledge and the religion. Peace be upon you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings.
Composed on 26 Rajab 1411 A.H.l11 February 1991 A.D.
General Director of Research, Writing, and Translation Fath Allah Ya Sin Jazar [signed]
Muhammad 'Umar Muhammad 'Umar [signed] Seal of al-Azhar [stamped] General Department for Research, Writing, and Translation.
- Can Islam live in true peace with the infidels?
No.
By: Ofer Binshtok
Only Hudna (truces), a temporary ceasefire, is made because Islam is in a weak position against the infidels. Hudna buys Islam time until its power overcomes the infidels, and then it will exterminate them, in accordance with Allah’s commands from the Quran and Muhammad.
*According to Muhammad, Bukhari 1765, the earth belongs to Allah and his messenger, to Islam:
Bukhari 1765:
"…The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: I want this... - He said to them (the same words) the third time (and on getting the same reply) he added: You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle…"
* According to Allah, from Qur'an 47.35, Allah commands the believers, do not seek peace when your hand is uppermost:
Qur'an 47.35:
"…So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior…"
* When Islam is in a position of weakness against the infidels, they have a holy command from Allah from the Quran and Muhammad to lie to the infidels to buy time:
Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called,: "War is deceit".
Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939:
“Lying in time of war”.
The message from Quran 3.28:
Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya.
The message from Quran 16.106:
"...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allāh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..."
* Indeed, Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels:
“Islam is in an eternal state of war against heresy and disbelievers”.
Quran 9.29 begins with:
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah...”
The message is also from Quran 8.39
Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world.
Quran 9.123 begins with:
"O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..."
The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25:
"Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protected…"
* In 628 AD, Muhammad moved towards Mecca with an army of 1,400 warriors, a force that was not strong enough to face the mechanical army of the Quraysh tribe. This is why he signed the Hudna Treaty of Hudaybiya, a temporary 10-year ceasefire with the Quraish tribe. An agreement that was considered humiliating for him since he was forbidden to sign it while mentioning his status as a prophet and messenger of Allah. But Muhammad saw this agreement as a victory that gave him time to break the Quraysh's defense agreements with third parties (Bukhari 2731-2732). Which indeed allowed him a year later, in 629, to also attack the Jews of Khaibar.
* According to Sharia law, hudna is a temporary ceasefire agreement for ten years; this is the only agreement that Muslims are allowed to sign with the infidels:
* TRUCES (Hudna)
09.16 (O: As for truces, the author does not mention them. In Sacred Law truce means a peace treaty with those hostile to Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period, whether for payment or something else. The scriptural basis for them includes such Koranic verses as:
(1) "An acquittal from Allah and His messenger..." (Koran 9:1);
(2) "If they incline towards peace, then incline towards it also" (Koran 8:61);
as well as the truce which the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made with Quraysh in the year of Hudaybiya, as related by Bukhari and Muslim.
Truces are permissible, not obligatory. The only one who may effect a truce is the Muslim ruler of a region (or his representative) with a segment of the non-Muslims of the region, or the caliph (o25) (or his representative). When made with other than a portion of the non-Muslims, or when made with all of them, or with all in a particular region such as India or Asia Minor, then only the caliph (or his representative) may effect it, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence because it entails the nonperformance of jihad, whether globally or in a given locality, and our interests must be looked after therein, which is why it is best left to the caliph under any circumstances, or to someone he delegates to see to the interests of the various regions.
There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. Allah Most High says,
"So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost" (Koran )
Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before its time was up. If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud. It is not permissible to stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does not exceed ten years.
The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax (def: 011);
namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires.
* In 630 AD, Muhammad's power increased; he broke the agreement with Quraish and moved towards Mecca with about 10 thousand warriors and conquered it. The Quraish tribe converted to Islam, and Muhammad abolished the religious tolerance that existed in Mecca. With his own hands, he began to destroy the 360 holy sites for the different religions that lived there in mutual tolerance and harmony. He abolished this tolerance and left only the Islamic holy site.
* Quran 8.58, in fact, allows Muslims to cancel any contract for "fear” that the other party will break it. Not because the other party violated the agreement, but only out of fear. So signing an agreement with Islam is basically meaningless.
Quran 8.58:
"If you are afraid of the treachery of some of your allies, you may disregard your treaty with them. God does not love the treacherous ones."
In conclusion:
As a religious command, from Allah, from the Quran, from Muhammad, and from Sharia law:
* Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels, until it destroys them.
* When Islam is weak, the believers are commanded to obtain a hudna (temporary ceasefire) so that they can gain strength that will surpass the strength of the infidels.
* There is no meaning in signing an agreement with Islam since they are allowed to violate it at any moment.
* When the power of the believers exceeds the power of the infidels, the believers are ordered to abandon the Hudna agreement and destroy the infidels. x.com/Ofer_binshtok/…
- A Muslim must be loyal only to the Islamic Ummah
By: Ofer Binshtok
The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic Ummah, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic Ummah.
The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic Ummah. A Ummah that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic Ummah, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic Ummah will be established—that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic Ummah will replace it.
The fact that the idea of Ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Quran.
Quran 5.51:
"O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers), they are but Auliyâ’ of each other. And if any amongst you takes them (as Auliyâ’), then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust)."
Quran 2.143
"Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful."
Quran 3.104
"Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers."
Quran 3.110
"You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient."
Quran 16.92
"And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]."
Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649:
Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me."
Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167:
"The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." x.com/Ofer_binshtok/…
