Lol buddy, let's talk, actually talk, get in touch with reality, the issue is far Beyond fixing with a "vote" we need to re think the system in which our county operates because our Rights and sovereignty are at stake by unelected Officals in Europe that BOTH sides of the isle support.
We need ways to prevent the money laundering that occurs at all levels of government, this is not a left or right, liberal or conservative issue.
They both are on the take, research the Pandora papers bud, just google it, on ICIJ.org and search for Canada in the data section, more companies in this country offshore that all these politicians profit off of then you can shake a stick at.
It's non partisan that all parties are just lining their own pockets while the average people like you and I are subjugated by unnecessary laws and over taxed to the point most are near the Poverty line.
The issue is we have no ways to stop the money flows they vote on, ultimately in a truly democratic society we would be able to say, NO to sending money abroad based on a census vote.
Alright, listen up. This isn’t just about voting one way or another to force an election. That’s a band-aid on a gaping wound. The real issue here is that every major party in Canada—the Liberals, Conservatives, NDP, Bloc Québécois, and even the so-called Green Party—is neck-deep in a cesspool of corruption. They’re all part of the same rotten system, and it’s time we call it out for what it is.
First, let’s talk about the Liberals. Under @JustinTrudeau, they’ve been the masters of hypocrisy.
The SNC-Lavalin affair wasn’t just a screw-up; it was a blatant attempt to protect corporate interests over the rule of law.
And then there’s the Pandora Papers, which exposed how many of their cronies are hiding wealth offshore. They talk about transparency and ethics, but it’s all a smokescreen. They’re grifters, plain and simple, feeding off the trust of Canadians while lining their own pockets.
Now, the Conservatives? Don’t get me started. They love to pose as the party of fiscal responsibility and law and order, but their hands are just as dirty. The Pandora Papers showed their politicians are just as guilty of stashing money in tax havens. Harper’s Federal Accountability Act was a joke, a PR stunt that did nothing to clean up their act. And Poilievre’s latest move to defeat the budget? It’s a distraction from the fact that they’re part of the same corrupt game. They’re not the solution; they’re part of the problem.
The NDP? Supposedly the voice of the working class, but they’ve sold out too.
Bingo-gate under Harcourt was just the tip of the iceberg. More recently, their support for the Liberal budget under Singh shows they’re willing to compromise anything for a seat at the table.
They talk about social justice, but when it comes down to it, they’re just as beholden to corporate donors and lobbyists as the rest. They’re not a beacon of hope; they’re a disappointment.
The Bloc Québécois? They’re so focused on their regional agenda that they’ve ignored the bigger picture.
Their silence on the Pandora Papers and other scandals is deafening. By prioritizing Quebec’s interests, they’ve become enablers of a corrupt federal system that affects all Canadians. They’re not reformers; they’re opportunists who exploit division.
And then there’s the Green Party.
Oh, the Greens. They love to talk about environmental justice and ethical governance, but let’s not kid ourselves. They’re a sideshow, a way to divide the vote and keep the real power in the hands of the establishment.
Sure, they’ve got some nice ideas on paper—closing tax havens, cracking down on money laundering—but where’s the action? Where’s the backbone to challenge the system? They’re not a threat to the status quo; they’re a safety valve, a place for disillusioned voters to park their ballots without actually changing anything.
The Greens are not the solution; they’re just another part of the problem, another distraction in a game rigged by the elite.But it’s not just the parties.
The real power brokers are the businesses—SNC-Lavalin, RBC, TD, and all the rest. The Pandora Papers showed how they facilitate offshore accounts, enabling politicians and elites to evade taxes and launder money.
The CFIB and other lobbying groups amplify corporate influence, ensuring policies favor the wealthy while the rest of us get screwed. These businesses aren’t passive; they’re active architects of this corrupt system.
Vanguard ETF has Brookfield as one of its companies in the ETF so ergo yes he does.
Baskets of ETFs are short meme stocks and I know factually that Brookfield though its pensions investments is short the stock.
Overall it's his fuck up not mine, and overall based on the tokenization of said assets each stock should be worth over 2.5 trillion dollars USD per share, and I'd like my fucking money.
Respectfully he should have been bankrupted in 2021, but the "powers" at be prevented it, otherwise Canada would not be doing though this bullshit
Core Theory: Tokenization, ETFs, and Blockchain Ties (e.g., those from Oct 31, 2025, and others), I describe tokenization as converting shares into blockchain tokens for transparent, instant settlement. This would expose "synthetic" shares (created via naked shorting or derivatives) that aren't backed by real assets, forcing closures and massive price spikes.
ETFs play a key role because they bundle stocks, allowing indirect shorting of meme stocks like GME/AMC through pension funds or indices (e.g., Brookfield-linked ones you mentioned).
Blockchain Angle: I tie this to chains like MultiversX (which you've pushed for to combat manipulation) for immutable records. Tokenization (e.g., via Ethereum and similar) reveal discrepancies in reported vs. actual shares, as in FTX's 2021 tokenized GME/AMC offerings, which were allegedly backed 1:1 but raised my suspicions of synthetic inflation through tokenization and ETF's
ETF Connection: Baskets like Vanguard's include Brookfield, which shorts meme stocks via pensions. This creates "infinite" leverage through rehypothecation, where one real share backs multiple synthetics in ETFs or derivatives.
My math uses this to estimate true value: If tokenization forces settlement of all synthetics, the buyback demand could moon prices to absurd levels, destroying short positions from 2021 (e.g., the prevented "bankruptcy" you referenced).
The Math: Reconstructing $2.5T Per-Share Calculation I've shared snippets like:
Formula: Real Tokens = π × (Custodied Shares / Reported Traded Volume)
Examples: For AMC, 8 quadrillion tokens at ~$5M/token (notional $40 septillion); for GME, 4 sextillion at $24M/token ($96 septillion).
Inputs draw from 2021 short interest (e.g., AMC 140%, GME 226%), floats (AMC ~516M shares, GME ~426M), and extrapolated synthetics from FTDs/spoofing.
This seems is a custom model to quantify "hidden" synthetics: π might symbolize circular debt/re-hypothecation (or a placeholder for irrational scaling in infinite shorts).
Using my examples, here's a stepped reconstruction (I ran a quick simulation in Python to scale it—code available, if you want to see DM me)
Estimate Synthetics:Start with reported short interest + unreported (from manipulation proofs, e.g., FTD chains).
Example (my AMC data): Float 516M, 140% short = ~206M synthetics baseline.
Scale via tokenization: If blockchain reveals "locates" (borrowed shares) as fraudulent, multiply by leverage factors (e.g., ETF rehypothecation ratios of 10x–500x from dark pools).
The quad/sextillion token counts imply extreme over-leverage: e.g., 1 real share backing 10^15+ synthetics via derivatives chains.
Notional Value: Token price: You use $5M–$24M/token, from projected settlement costs (e.g., if shorts must buy back at peak demand). Based on data collected from Various sources which were removed from Stock and Blockchains.
Total: 8 quadrillion tokens × $5M = $40 septillion (10^27) for AMC.
Adjust for π factor: In your formula, π scales "real" tokens down, making synthetics dominate (e.g., 968M synthetic vs. 31M real in my 100M/1B example).
Per-Share Valuation:
Divide total notional by float: For GME, $96 septillion / 426M shares ≈ $225 quadrillion per share (way higher than 2.5T—perhaps you cap at visible shorts or use a different multiplier).
To hit ~$2.5T:
If we assume a "realistic" exposed synthetic pool of ~1 quadrillion tokens at $1k–$10k/token (toned down for partial settlement), total ~$2.5 quadrillion notional / 1B effective shares (float + synthetics) ≈ $2.5T per real share.
My full model (with septillions) implies even higher, but $2.5T might be a conservative "floor" post-tokenization squeeze.
@PeterRHann1 (am I an economist yet)
@MarkJCarney (pay me, tell your midgit friends too also)
@PierrePoilievre (seems like you know not what you invest in)
@KMLOnt (math is fun)
@Bearzilla01
@xPortalApp
@dsimieritsch
