PeterTorkemada Profile picture
May 31 4 tweets 2 min read
THREAD: 1. Why Sussman is guilty as charged.
The popular leftist narrative goes "who cares what Sussman told Baker? Everyone knew he was working for the Clinton campaign." It's flawed because it's asking the wrong question.
2. The right question is "would Baker have passed on Sussman's data to investigators had Sussman informed him he was there representing the Clinton campaign?" The answer is no. In fact Baker said he wouldn't have even taken the meeting.
May 28 5 tweets 2 min read
MINI-THREAD: 1. Durham the diabolical? In its closing argument the Sussman defense team ripped the FBI as being willing and complicit participants in Sussman's Alfa data operation. Did Durham purposely encourage and prod them into doing so?
2. Durham had to know Sussman's team needed to maintain the FBI was hot to investigate this regardless of Sussman's affiliation with the Clinton campaign, to show Sussman's alleged false statement wasn't material. So Durham portrayed the FBI as innocent victims of Suss's lie.