@syrpis @GeorgePeretzQC @Sime0nStylites @GuitarMoog @rdanielkelemen @mrjamesob @lsebrexitvote I agree, a PV without a GE mandate for it would be hazardous, especially with limited preparation time & one after a GE would be daft. A GNU purely for a PV would be v hard to set up or keep on an even keel. It postpones addressing the causes of Brexit & could make them worse. 1/ @syrpis @GeorgePeretzQC @Sime0nStylites @GuitarMoog @rdanielkelemen @mrjamesob @lsebrexitvote If there is to be a GNU, its aim should be to solve Brexit within 2 years by running a proper transparent consultative process with full impact assessments. There should be no preconceptions about the outcome or whether or not a confirmatory PV is required. 2/

A Cautionary Tale

Jacob. Who ran away from Europa, his Nurse, and was eaten by a Lion

By Hillairy Bolloc

Thread

1/ 2/
There was a Boy whose name was Jacob;
A favourite of the Tory Club.
They gave him Tea, and Cakes, and Jam,
And slices of delicious Ham,
And Chocolate with pink inside
And little Tricycles to ride,
And read him Stories through and through,

You say you’re being misrepresented, but in fact it is you who’s misrepresenting what I am saying. What I said was clear. Whatever the Court decides, EUNoWA was framed so as to sideline Parliament, to let it duck its responsibility. As you say yourself 1/5

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @prof_phillipson view original on Twitter

I said you should be ashamed to be providing intellectual cover to the process. I think so still. As for your claim that you’ve already refuted the points being made, it seems to me you just ignore questions you don’t have answers to. Like this. 2/5

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @paolobrennan view original on Twitter