Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence samples in this thread. 🧵

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence samples in this thread. 🧵

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

@FBI & @FBIDirectorKash, This is very important and concerns our national security. Please check your phone and email records at your field office near Columbia, MO. I called my local FBI field office and spoke to an FBI agent, when I lived there for 4 years from 2013-2017, to discuss very important evidence about the 9/11 terrorist attack, which I have provided a preview of below. I first called my local sheriff in Columbia, MO, but he said that the evidence I shared was too important for his team, so he advised me to contact the FBI instead. When I called the local FBI field office, I spoke to an FBI agent who provided me with an email address that I could send the evidence to. I sent the FBI agent the evidence and never heard back from him. No phone reply, no email reply, nothing. I would greatly appreciate it if you could please review the following evidence preview. 🧵

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

@FBI & @FBIDirectorKash, This is very important and concerns our national security. Please check your phone and email records at your field office near Columbia, MO. I called my local FBI field office and spoke to an FBI agent, when I lived there for 4 years from 2013-2017, to discuss very important evidence about the 9/11 terrorist attack, which I have provided a preview of below. I first called my local sheriff in Columbia, MO, but he said that the evidence I shared was too important for his team, so he advised me to contact the FBI instead. When I called the local FBI field office, I spoke to an FBI agent who provided me with an email address that I could send the evidence to. I sent the FBI agent the evidence and never heard back from him. No phone reply, no email reply, nothing. I would greatly appreciate it if you could please review the following evidence preview. 🧵

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

🧵@FBI & @FBIDirectorKash, This is very important and concerns our national security. Please check your phone and email records at your field office near Columbia, MO. I called my local FBI field office and spoke to an FBI agent, when I lived there for 4 years from 2013-2017, to discuss very important evidence about the 9/11 terrorist attack, which I have provided a preview of below. I first called my local sheriff in Columbia, MO, but he said that the evidence I shared was too important for his team, so he advised me to contact the FBI instead. When I called the local FBI field office, I spoke to an FBI agent who provided me with an email address that I could send the evidence to. I sent the FBI agent the evidence and never heard back from him. No phone reply, no email reply, nothing. I would greatly appreciate it if you could please review the following evidence preview. 🧵

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

@FBI & @FBIDirectorKash, This is very important and concerns our national security. Please check your phone and email records at your field office near Columbia, MO. I called my local FBI field office and spoke to an FBI agent, when I lived there for 4 years from 2013-2017, to discuss very important evidence about the 9/11 terrorist attack, which I have provided a preview of below. I first called my local sheriff in Columbia, MO, but he said that the evidence I shared was too important for his team, so he advised me to contact the FBI instead. When I called the local FBI field office, I spoke to an FBI agent who provided me with an email address that I could send the evidence to. I sent the FBI agent the evidence and never heard back from him. No phone reply, no email reply, nothing. I would greatly appreciate it if you could please review the following evidence preview.

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

@FBI & @FBIDirectorKash, Please check your phone and email records at your field office near Columbia, MO. I called my local FBI field office and spoke to an FBI agent, when I lived there for 4 years from 2013-2017, to discuss very important evidence about the 9/11 terrorist attack, which I have provided a preview of below. I first called my local sheriff in Columbia, MO, but he said that the evidence I shared was too important for his team, so he advised me to contact the FBI instead. When I called the local FBI field office, I spoke to an FBI agent who provided me with an email address that I could send the evidence to. I sent the FBI agent the evidence and never heard back from him. No phone reply, no email reply, nothing.

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

@FBI & @FBIDirectorKash, Please check your phone and email records at your field office near Columbia, MO. I called my local FBI field office and spoke to an FBI agent, when I lived there for 4 years from 2013-2017, to discuss very important evidence about the 9/11 terrorist attack, which I have provided a preview of below. I first called my local sheriff in Columbia, MO, but he said that the evidence I shared was too important for his team, so he advised me to contact the FBI instead. When I called the local FBI field office, I spoke to an FBI agent who provided me with an email address that I could send the evidence to. I sent the FBI agent the evidence and never heard back from him. No phone reply, no email reply, nothing.

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

WTC1 Literally Turning to Dust ("Lathering Up") on 9/11 [45x Speed] facebook.com/drjudywood/vid…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

@FBI & @FBIDirectorKash, Please check your phone and email records at your field office near Columbia, MO. I called my local FBI field office and spoke to an FBI agent, when I lived there for 4 years from 2013-2017, to discuss very important evidence about the 9/11 terrorist attack, which I have provided a preview of below. I first called my local sheriff in Columbia, MO, but he said that the evidence I shared was too important for his team, so he advised me to contact the FBI instead. When I called the local FBI field office, I spoke to an FBI agent who provided me with an email address that I could send the evidence to. I sent the FBI agent the evidence and never heard back from him. No phone reply, no email reply, nothing.

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood

Hurricane Erin (category 3) traveled in a straight line towards New York City for 4-5 days from September 7th-11th 2001, reaching its closest point to land, just off the coast, on the morning of 9/11/2001. Despite Hurricane Erin's threatening trajectory, we suspiciously weren't warned by most corporate news broadcasts in the days leading up to 9/11, or on the morning of 9/11. When most corporate news channels displayed schematic weather maps of the northeast U.S. coastline, Hurricane Erin was not shown. Hurricane Erin was similar in size to Hurricane Katrina and similar in strength to Hurricane Sandy (category 3), and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, yet we weren't warned by most corporate news outlets that Hurricane Erin was heading straight for densely populated New York City.

Hurricane Erin - Pt.1 Manufactured Storm | IRREFUTABLE Episode 6 youtube.com/watch?v=bhbZNO…

Video Compilation of Local News Weather Reports from September 11th 2001 youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Astonishingly, Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th 2001, before it did a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that thunder and rain were reported and/or measured at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC. It is widely known that major corporate media outlets do not hesitate to report on category 3 hurricanes that are heading straight for the east coast. Instead, they warn people that a hurricane is coming, and they report on it frequently, giving regular updates and alerting the public in case a potential evacuation becomes necessary, and so preparations can be made.

Furthermore, if one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC and the 2001 magnetic north pole, along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°. Official NOAA & UW-CIMSS Hurricane Erin tracking information, Farmer's Almanac airport weather records, and a video compilation of corporate news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th, 2001 are provided below.

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin, a category 3 hurricane, during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to New York City. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the hurricane's eye has an unusual appearance. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin (category 3) approaches New York City during mid-morning on 9/11/01. Notice how close Hurricane Erin is to NYC. A column of dust can be seen coming from ground zero, and the western edge of Hurricane Erin can be seen at the bottom of the photo. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
(9/11/01) Source: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a0…

Hurricane Erin got so close to NYC that rough seas and sea swells were reported by many news channels. There are also reports that thunder and/or rain were reported at nearby international airports, including Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia, even though skies were clear in NYC.

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center 'Best Track' figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-17, 2001. Notice the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on the morning of 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. nhc.noaa.gov/prelims/2001er…
2. nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison figure showing the recorded path of Hurricane Erin from September 1-15, 2001. Notice that the hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Sources:
1. tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/storm_archive/…
2. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

Official NOAA 2010 Atlantic hurricane season map showing wind speeds, category levels, and tracked paths. Each storm is color coded and labeled with the name of the storm. If one studies Atlantic hurricane paths tracked from 1995 to 2010, one can easily see that Hurricane Erin's path is unique in its suddenly getting locked onto a straight line towards NYC along the minus-15 declination line of earth's magnetic field for 4+ days, then making a strange ~150° turn after reaching its closest point to NYC, before heading northeast away from the U.S. eastern coast. Turns of 45° to 90° are fairly common for northern Atlantic hurricanes, but not ~150°.
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Source:
1. noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/im…
2. weather.about.com/od/imagegaller…
3. weather.about.com/od/hurricanes/…

NBC Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

CBS Morning News forecast on September 11th, 2001. Where is Hurricane Erin? The hurricane was headed straight for NYC for several days, reaching its nearest point to NYC on 9/11. Why didn't the morning news inform us about the category 3 hurricane that was headed straight for NYC on 9/11?
facebook.com/photo.php?fbid…
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

Video compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of September 11th 2001: youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdY…

These are some of the many pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood


Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the evidence.

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland). facebook.com/drjudywood/pho… Source: drjudywood.com & vimeo.com/57923364

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaW…

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: youtube.com/watch?v=BxA2cZ…

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. You can even see the WTC buildings disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air with your very own eyes, like Alka-Seltzer tablets in water. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion) youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1…

Dustification | Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQ…

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GP…

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up' process prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]: youtube.com/watch?v=V_AoDy…

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=YCtfQJ…

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse): youtube.com/watch?v=cDoWaa…

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student youtube.com/watch?v=qBP9mN…

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSi…

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7u…

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQ…

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmv…

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPn…

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermi…

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar: youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py…

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite: oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2011/03/steven…

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/non…

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted: legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/20…

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence! youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXA…

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry: metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2…

Aluminum Glows: drjudywood.com/articles/alumi…

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV): drjudywood.com/articles/why/w…

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
DrJudyWood.com
CheckTheEvidence.com
Facebook.com/DrJudyWood