Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
حيدر‎ Profile picture
حيدر‎
@Qalam001
https://t.co/OqBvkxrfxv | https://t.co/3dfRBeFj3C I Ahmadi Muslim I All views are my own I RTs≠Endorsements I Love 4 All, Hatred 4 None.
Mar 16, 2021 • 15 tweets • 6 min read
I came across this post & was surprised by the point being made. Not only, is there not any point from Islam that disprove Ahmad (as) claim but this argument put forward by @gobusurv actually refutes his own aqida. His argument is that 1300 years had passed & since there hasnt been such a long gap in the advent of a prophet, Ahmad (as) is false. The irony of this argument is that more than 1400 years have passed yet there is no sign of Isa (as) of Bani Israel's return.
Mar 16, 2021 • 13 tweets • 5 min read
A lot of edgy trolls who themselves haven't studied Islam mocking brother Harun for stating an important fact of Islam.

Allah says in the Quran: قَالَتِ الۡاَعۡرَابُ اٰمَنَّا

That is, “The Arabs of the desert say, ‘We believe.’” In other words, this is a declaration they make regarding their own faith.

Allah says further: قُلۡ لَّمۡ تُؤۡمِنُوۡا وَ لٰکِنۡ قُوۡلُوۡۤا اَسۡلَمۡنَا وَ لَمَّا یَدۡخُلِ الۡاِیۡمَانُ فِیۡ قُلُوۡبِکُمۡ
Mar 14, 2021 • 15 tweets • 5 min read
This is such a sad attempt to grasp at straws by @MARazack26 who instead of admitting that his friend Musakhar lied on the stream, have gone to the lengths of exposing himself of dishonesty.

The book he is referring to is written by a Lahori Ahmadi called Dr. Basharat Ahmad. This book is not the original book of Ahmad (as) nor does it even present the original excerpt but a interpretation of it. None of us are Lahori Ahmadis nor do we subscribe to their beliefs, the Lahoris disagree with Ahmad (as) on theological issues & dont consider him a prophet
Jan 13, 2021 • 19 tweets • 9 min read
Youre incorrect. Allah Makes it clear that a human passes away either by dying naturally or being killed as Allah States:

أَفَإِنْ مَاتَ أَوْ قُتِلَ
If then he die or be slain

when Khala is used in the past tense for human beings, it is always used for passing away, i.e. Death. We see this in countless examples of the Quran.
Jan 13, 2021 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
If you read your own tafsir it mentions it means sleep if layl (night) or manam (sleep) is mentioned which it is in 6:60 but not in the verses pertaining to the death of Isa (as). 1/ Whenever tawaffa appears in the form of Bab Tafa-ul and the subject is Allah or the angels, and the object on which this verb is applied has a soul, (no night or sleep being mentioned) always infers the meaning of death as it does with the verses regarding Isa (as) 2/
Jan 12, 2021 • 9 tweets • 4 min read
You just acknowledged Isa (as) will be the last prophet on earth before Qiyama . Brother, cant you see the truth is coming from your own hands but youre still in denial? Older prophets cant return to future Ummahs according to Islam. Its against the Sunnah of Allah. 1/ We see this in the hadith regarding Musa (as). When He (as) pleaded to Allah to be a prophet for a future Ummah it was rejected. Prophets of any Ummah are from themselves. 2/
Jan 12, 2021 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
Have you ever wondered why all these so-called muslim handles hide behind aliases & anonymous profiles? Their cunning nature runs so deep they themselves know theyre liars.

Allegation is against the revelation of Ahmad (as) where he states "Yalash is the name of God Himself” 1/ Ahmad (as) has himself explained its meaning & stated: 2/
Jan 11, 2021 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
Yes, I do. You dont it seems. "Sufis" are part of the Ahl-ul-sunnah which is an umbrella term for all those ascribing to the Aqaid of Ahl-ul-Sunnah, which literally means "people of the Sunnah" & it includes ahmadis. You dismiss scholars that dont fit your view as I've said 1/ earlier because your dishonest. Many scholars agreed with the Ahmadi Aqida, some didnt. Which shows that we have to refer to back to the Quran & Muhammad (sa) to establish the truth which youre scared to do because you have no argument from them. 2/
Aug 14, 2020 • 11 tweets • 5 min read
Followers of @hwmaqbul cant answer my simple question & turn to red herring fallacy. @Mahz4130 have read 0 books of Ahmad (as) & refers to some random site instead of investigating whether Ahmad (as) claimed to be the Hindu god, Krishna.

Dishonesty of these people is appalling the Hindus call Krishna an avatar. In Hinduism, the concept of a prophet is in reality referred to as an avatar. The word autar in their language comes from “utara” and means the same as a messenger in English. Ahmad (as) explained that Krishna was a prophet who had his message
Jul 21, 2020 • 9 tweets • 4 min read
AlhamdulilAllah. In a debate @exMoslemsInc was shown the statement of the great companion Ibn Abbas (ra) who believed in the death of Isa (as). @exMoslemsInc rejected the english text & wanted to see the arabic, when shown the arabic he completely ignored the statement & directed the debate elsewhere instead of addressing the point of Ibn Abbas (ra). Anti ahmadis will never be able to debate from Quran/Hadith. They'll mock/abuse & ignore whatever evidence you show them. Since, @exMoslemsInc wasnt able to respond to the statement of Ibn Abbas (as) he lost
Jul 20, 2020 • 17 tweets • 6 min read
Refuting @AbdelbarrM regarding the verse the Quranic verse 43:62

the argument that this refers that Isa (as) is alive, has no basis at all. In this verse, no where has Allah stated that Isa (as) will be a sign of the hour and that the hour will come soon. Allah could have simply stated that Isa (as) will be a sign of the hour but this is not stated in the verse. This verse does not only imply something of the future as its a nominal sentence in the Arabic language which is called jumlah Ismiyyah. It is a must for such sentences
Jul 19, 2020 • 7 tweets • 4 min read
When your ignorance & superficial understanding of Islam is similar to all the opponents of the previous Prophet.

Tajweed , meaning "elocution", refers to the rules governing pronunciation during recitation of the Quran. In this clip, the Khalifa is reciting the Quran correctly But hes not arab & doesnt sound like a native arabic speaker which theres nothing wrong with as some non-Arabs find perfecting their pronunciation difficult. 1 of the first Muslims was a non-Arab Ethiopian named Bilal (ra). He struggled to differentiate between the letters س & ش
Jul 18, 2020 • 11 tweets • 5 min read
Anti ahmadi extemists continue to lie. The first quote doesnt even remotely mention that Ahmad (as) died in the washroom, rather that he was weak due to illness & old age so arrangements were made near his bed. This incident happend many hours before he passed away. Theres nothing wrong with this. The Greatest man, Prophet Muhammad (sa) had similar arrangements made during his last days. This again proves how anti-ahmadis in their hatred of Ahmad (as) dont even spare Muhammad (sa) & mock him too.
Feb 27, 2020 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Its clear that in no way does the fact that Isa (sa) was not killed or crucified suggest that he is alive in heaven. This same ayah can apply to even the Prophet Muhammad (sa) who was neither killed nor crucified and was also raised. This applies to many prophets and many righteous people who have died. They were neither killed nor crucified & were indeed raised by Allah, who is Al-Rafi, the One Who Exalts - The word rafa’a, whenever it is used for a human beings always refers to the elevation of the status on whom Allah has caused his exaltation