NEW: Did Tides Advocacy, at the Center of a Soros-Funded Charitable Network, Disclose What Federal Tax Law Requires? (5 Part Thread with Descriptive Images)

Full Investigation with Receipts🔗whitecollarfraud.com/2026/05/26/did…

A charity gets your money. You get a tax deduction. In exchange, that charity is barred from political campaign work. That's the deal Congress made with every donor in America.

Now watch what happens when the deal gets bent. 👇

There's an organization called Tides Advocacy — recently renamed "Beyond Impact." It is not a charity. It's a 501(c)(4), which means it can spend on politics, but donations to it are not tax-deductible.

Over two years, it pulled roughly 45% of its money — tens of millions — from charities. The same charities whose donors wrote it off on their taxes. And over those same two years, it spent $22.2 million on political activity, including $2.2 million to groups backing Zohran Mamdani for Mayor of New York.

So: money goes in the charity door (tax-deductible, no politics allowed), and comes out the political door. That's the maneuver. It's the difference between a donor paying full freight for politics and a donor getting the taxpayer to subsidize it.

Here's the part that isn't opinion. 📄

On its federal tax return, signed under penalty of perjury, this organization checked a box that said it had no related organizations.

Its own independent audit — same year, signed by a national accounting firm — named five related charities. Shared employees. Shared offices. Shared overhead. Over $40 million moving between them in a single year.

The tax return says no one. The audit says five. Same organization, same year, two documents that point in opposite directions.

There's a tax-law principle for exactly this: substance over form. It means the IRS looks at what an organization actually does, not just what it writes on a form. You don't get to check "no" in a box when your own auditor documents shared staff, shared offices, and $40 million in transactions. When the form and the reality disagree, the form gets tested against the facts.

And then the tell. 🔎

I published all of this — naming the organization — in October. Three months later, the organization quietly changed its name and erased the language on its own website that had described its relationship to the charities. The Internet Archive caught the old language. The tax returns are permanent. The audits are signed.

Here's a detail I didn't have before.

The old website listed three separate mailing addresses — all in Southern California, none matching the San Francisco address where its own auditor placed its operations. After the rebrand, the new website narrowed that to a single address — and it's the same out-of-state private mailbox, roughly 380 miles from where the auditor says the work actually happens.

Three addresses became one. The two that disappeared were the finance and delivery addresses. On the same month as the rebrand.

A website can be edited. A name can be changed. A Form 990 stays filed.

I think the public deserves to see the question.

Everything above is from the organizations' own public filings.

Read them yourself.
🔗whitecollarfraud.com/2026/05/26/did…

IMAGES FOLLOW ON THREAD 👇 Did Tides Advocacy, at the Center of a Soros-Funded Charitable Network, Disclose What Federal Tax Law Requires? (Thread)

You donate to a charity. You get a tax deduction. In exchange, that charity is barred from political campaign work. That's the bargain Congress made with every donor in America. Charitable money and political money follow different rules.

THREAD, PART 1: Ten Easy Steps to Uncover Mortgage Fraud by Letitia James (without ordering a title report, which I had to do for the Virginia Properties).

Go to the NYC Dept of Building Website and enter the following information, and press GO.

LINK: a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/bispi00… THREAD, PART 2: Select "View Certificates of Occupancy"

From Soros to Mamdani, a syndicate of tax-exempts disguised as charity raises IRS red flags across the money trail. (Multi-Part Thread/with Illustrations)

FULL INVESTIGATION WITH RECEIPTS➡️whitecollarfraud.com/2025/09/01/sor…

Zohran Mamdani’s rise represents just one product of a $52+ million syndicate of tax-exempt entities we uncovered—where George Soros’s tax-deductible charitable donations systematically convert into political power through entities that deny relationships while engaging in $11.6 million in circular money flows.

🔥 The coordination methods mirror those often seen in criminal enterprises: multiple legitimate-appearing entities that obscure the true flow and purpose of funds. Sophisticated schemes don’t announce their coordination—they create plausible separation while maintaining operational control. The same structural patterns appear here: shared leadership claiming independence, circular money flows between “unrelated” entities, and selective transparency that conceals relationships from federal oversight while acknowledging them in other contexts.

THE FOUR-CHANNEL CONVERSION SYSTEM:
✅Channel 1 – Direct Political Pipeline: Soros → Open Society Action Fund (501(c)(4)) → $5.15M → Working Families Organization (501(c)(4))
✅Channel 2a – Charitable Conversion: Soros → Foundation to Promote Open Society (501(c)(3)) → $6.4M → Tides Foundation (501(c)(3)) → $4.56M → Working Families Organization (501(c)(4)) (Donors get tax deductions, money funds political ops)
✅Channel 2b – Indirect Conversion: Foundation to Promote Open Society → $2.1M → Tides Center → $343,753 → Tides Advocacy → $430,173 → Working Families Organization
✅Channel 3 – Government Subsidy: U.S. Taxpayers → $35.4M → Tides Center (501(c)(3)) → shares infrastructure with political “affiliate” Tides Advocacy (501(c)(4))
✅Channel 4 – Make the Road Pipeline: Taxpayers → $16.1M → Make the Road New York → $165K → Make the Road Action → political operations

🔫 THE SMOKING GUN – MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITIES:
Working Families Organization Circular Flows ($755,173)
➡️Out: $325K to entities claiming to be “unrelated”
⬅️Back: $430K from those same entities
✅Timing + amounts indicate deliberate coordination, not coincidence
💵Total: $11.6M+ in bidirectional flows routed through entities that systematically denied any relationship on federal tax returns—creating filings that are mathematically irreconcilable with the documented money trail.

❌ EIN REPORTING IRREGULARITIES: Multiple organizations reported Employer Identification Numbers that either mismatched controlling entities or conflicted across filings. These errors are not clerical; they show attempts to obscure relationships the IRS requires to be disclosed.

PATTERN OF KNOWLEDGE: WFP’s 2022 memo documents regulatory expertise (“WFP coordinated a significant grassroots IE table”), raising serious questions about whether the 2023 concealment was willful.

We've filed an Enhanced Sixth Supplemental IRS whistleblower complaint documenting these potential violations with detailed evidence and mathematical proof. The complaint requests immediate investigation while these patterns continue operating daily. Channel 1 – Direct Soros Political Pipeline:

Today is the 35th anniversary of Crazy Eddie's infamous Panama Pump money laundering scheme.

(continued) First, a primer on the economics of income tax evasion and securities fraud to better understand Crazy Eddie's Panama Pump money laundering scheme.

(continued)

I’m going to make this plain and simple:
•Audits are a myth.
•It doesn’t matter which accounting firm is doing the audit, Big 4 or a smaller firm.
•Real audits are too cost prohibitive.
(Continued)

https://twitter.com/retheauditors/status/1366779868944326658

•What are called “audits” today are merely limited reviews of financial statements designed to catch the accounting equivalent of grammatical errors and typos (like the review tool used in Microsoft Word).
(Continued)

Crazy Eddie Memoirs: None of the BIG 4 accounting firms are any good when it comes to so-called audits. In fact, there is NO SUCH THING as audits of public companies. The use of the term "audit" is false, misleading, and gives investors a false sense of security. [thread 1/4]

https://twitter.com/alexfrangos/status/1317143093116809223

At best, so-called audits as they are conducted today are limited reviews of financial reports similar to the grammar/spellcheck feature on MS Word. [thread 2/4]

Tip for Fraudsters: You get a bigger bang for the buck overstating income and overpaying taxes as public company than understating income and evading taxes as a private company. 1/ 2. For example, assume a 40% income tax rate. If you understate earnings by $1 million, you save $400k in taxes.