More often than usual, the scholars contend that a measly state like that of Kacchapaghatas had defeated the imperial paramaras. The scholars or Orientalists are themselves aware of the absurdity of such a proclamation, as there is no virtual comparison between two dynasties.
The claimants of this trash have all but one argument that the vaแนลฤvalฤซs of Sisodiyas contain Brฤhmin names of Vijayadatta and Keลavaลarman, hence they were originally all brฤhmaแนas but later when they took up weapons thenceforth, all of them became kแนฃatriyas
The Shahiyas of Kabul, Sindha and Lahore as well were of the same stock, that is they were Rajputs. Recently discovered Inscription from Afghan mentions Shahi Rajaputra Vyagrashura, who is called a Rajaputra thrice in his own inscription while he is a king in reality.
Those who have no interest in being a Hindu and a follower of Dharmaลฤstras should stop calling themselves Kแนฃatriya, Rฤjaputra or Rajpลซt at all, because the concept of Varna and jฤti originates from the Vedas and ลฤstras, without following them you cannot be a rajput.
Dr. Rhy David Gives ample evidence to put Panchatantra between 200 BCE - 100 BCE, however some scholars due to difference in manuscript regard it to a much later date. In either case let's see how Brฤhmaแน Viแนฃแนuลarman mentions Rajputs. 
