Alright alright, since there's many morons in the comment section trying to downplay these results by using the recent "doping scandal" as a gotcha, I will teach them a free lesson (my hourly rate is 500$ if there's further requests by the trolls)
Zelenskyy is the Liberal incarnate for me:
He's 1. A performative idealist
Giving speeches about how he is bravely defending against the evil Russians instead of negotiating a diplomatic solution.
Yet at the same time he's allying with far right militias and sponsors.
2. Clearly unsuited for his role, yet thinks that sheer power of will can replace expertise and results
He's a literal comedian millionaire who got voted president with no political experience. Once president he purged political opponents and didn't keep his campaign promises.
Jun 22, 2020 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
Okay, before China watchers start masturbating because they found something they deem to be "scientific evidence" of China lying about its case numbers again, let me clarify a few things here
To start with, I want to clarify for the nth time, that China underreporting cases at a time when the virus was virtually unknown is NOT proof of a sinister coverup.
Apr 10, 2020 • 19 tweets • 6 min read
1/ Okay, so I've taken a quick glance only (!!!) at the mathematical methods behind this model, here's what I could gather so far. Keep in mind that this is all just a personal observation from the perspective of a random dude in germany (long thread)
2/ First of all, the model: it is a generalized gaussian error function to fit the amount of cumulative deaths.
A gaussian error function is a normalized sigmoid function with the domain [-1,1] It follows that this specific model is bounded between 0 and the ultimate level p
