@OrackBomama @SnoopaDo @elizabethforma @mike_pence The whole problem is that you deal in half truths. You're scavenging the reporting for parts you like, regardless of how well your stated "facts" fit with the facts as they're actually offered. For example, you take the bottom proportion (1/1024) of an estimate... @OrackBomama @SnoopaDo @elizabethforma @mike_pence ...that goes as high as 1/64, about sixteen times more likely. Being a probabilistic estimate, you're butchering the real estimate to make her heritage look more distant, infinitesimal. So, too, do you treat the folks who the samples are from with the same disdain.