Following up on @DOGECommittee posts regarding cloud seeding, here is some additional information. a thread 🧵

Introduction to Cloud Seeding

Cloud seeding goes back to 1946, when General Electric research laboratories caused snow to fall near Mount Greylock in Massachusetts.

Seeding involves dispersing substances like silver iodide, potassium iodide, dry ice, or hygroscopic materials like table salt, and even propane into clouds causing the formation of ice crystals or water droplets, thereby increasing precipitation, often used to address water scarcity.

Common methods include aircraft-based dispersion and ground-based generators, with applications ranging from enhancing rainfall to suppressing hail or dispersing fog.

While it may seem like a solution to droughts, it comes with significant risks that need careful consideration.

The technique has been used in various regions, including the U.S., China, the UAE, and Australia, often in response to increasing water demands exacerbated by climate change and megadroughts.

Current estimates place seeding revenue around $128 million last year in the United States, which currently ranks 3rd globally; and projects to remain so as revenues steadily climb.
Unintended Weather Consequences:
Cloud seeding can lead to unintended and sometimes catastrophic weather events.

For example, it has been linked to increased urban flooding, as seen in the United Arab Emirates, where heavy rainfall overwhelmed infrastructure, and in the UK, where severe flooding was associated with cloud seeding operations.

Historical incidents, such as a deadly blizzard in China, have also been attributed to weather modification efforts, highlighting the difficulty in predicting and controlling outcomes.

Specific cases, like Oregon’s 1974-1975 Hood River seeding, caused overpowering rainfall leading to street collapses and mudslides, prompting discontinuation the following year.
(Image source: NYTimes)

At the same time we face a declining population crisis, the government is handing out grants to educate about "the detrimental effects of overpopulation."

The more we search, the more we find attempts to weaken the US through population control. (a thread) - but more the financials show a deep story.

"The primary exempt purpose of Negative Population Growth, Inc. (NPG) is to educate the American public and political leaders about the detrimental effects of overpopulation on our environment, resources, and quality of life. " according to their IRS filings. "NPG is a membership organization that advocates a smaller and truly sustainable United States population accomplished through voluntary incentives for smaller families and reduced immigration levels."

thank you to @DataRepublican for the tools to find more of this and to @twinforces for the Sankey chart that helped flag this. And how did they do it? Through targeting youth of course through the main stream legacy media

"In an effort to broaden the reach of our critical message to millions of Americans, we run advertisements in national publications such as the Washington Times National Weekly, Washington Examiner, and several special editions of USA Today," the filings show. "We enlist the activism of our nation's young people through our annual NPG scholarship contests, and work with educators across the country through our free NPG teacher's packet program. NPG publications are distributed to our nationwide membership, the full U.S. Congress, key contacts in the media, and other interested organizations."

They spent $864,000 on the project.

First run of the new NGO tool from @twinforces and I was not disappointed by how it works. I was however in absolute shock what I found. (a thread)

We have long suspected of kickbacks, but this was eye opening to see kickback grants and money handlers.

This is the cash from just ONE ngo Save The Children, and shows 1) how many people touch the money along the way, and 2) a view of the kickback grants.

Each pink line is a kickback grant. Each dot is a company that handled the money.
Most astounding in the beginning was seeing Save The Children give a grant to a company who then gave a grant right back to them.

DOGE Timeline — Beginning January 2025, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is tasked to reduce U.S. government spending, waste, fraud and abuse while also making gorvernment more efficient.

This is a thread of accomplishments: • January 20, 2025:
• DOGE is officially established via Executive Order 14158, with a mission to modernize federal technology, cut regulations, and reduce spending. The initiative is set to operate temporarily until July 4, 2026.
• A federal hiring freeze is implemented through a Presidential Memorandum, initiating workforce reduction plans.

• January 30, 2025: NOAA contract modified to “partially terminate,” saving $22 million.

Let’s take @Alladdin1983 work and go a little deeper. Hedge funds, $100 in office expense and universities begging for tax payer money, they giving it away to other universities - just so they can come back and ask for more money.

The Research Foundation has $72 million in hedge funds… against what? Why are they using tax payer money to bet against the stock market?

They have another $117 million invested in global stock funds. And $89 million handled by private firms.

Then consider 2 of their 5 paid contractors are Banks.

As mentioned earlier, half their funding comes from tax payers, funneled into the foundation from a dozen other universities.


This on top of the $17 million in travel, $7.5 million in meetings and conferences, and $100 million in office expenses… how much timer does one company need?

The DOGE suggestions are often criticized for cutting into agencies like Veterans’ Affairs.

.“they are taking away from vets”

This is a thread of more than $6 million in veteran affairs spending with Oriental Trading Company.

edible gummy bears
tropical tote bags
Glow sticks
And thousands of other Chinese-manufactured gimmick items.

While the company is based in Omaha, Nebraska, and has a significant fulfillment center there, it's estimated 85% of Oriental Trading Company's products are manufactured in China.


Neon bottles

This dive speaks to government waste, global manipulation and falls in line with the research being conducted by @DataRepublican

This is a long thread so please read through to get full context.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP) activities and funding sources reveal deep entanglements with government agencies, defense contractors, and foreign governments, raising questions about its true independence, mission of peace, and global agenda.

With more than $8.9 million in government funding and additional government contracts it was worth look into their IRS filings, which revealed alarming globalist agendas and high-profile connections.

President Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, who took the helm in 2022, has a history of service in both the Clinton and Obama administrations.

Former board chair Penny Pritzker, a billionaire and former Secretary of Commerce under Obama, exemplifies the revolving door between CEIP and high-level government positions.

This pattern raises concerns about the organization's ability to provide unbiased perspectives. Which only deepens in their financials.

CEIP's programs often mirror the agendas of its funders. For instance, its work on nuclear policy and international security frequently aligns with the strategic interests of NATO and the U.S. State Department.

Other programs invoke world order and nation rebuilding. Seemingly a big task for a company that only lists $147 million in revenue. 2) For each of the last four years CEIP has expanded details of operations in their IRS 990 schedule O filings.

One such program was transitioning their Geoeconomics and Strategy program into “America Statecraft Program” in 2021.

Calling it an “urgent need for a more disciplined US foreign policy” that is “realistic about the limits of America power.”

CEIP also launched an “Africa program which seeks to engage policymakers and scholars to shape global discourse and policy in the region.”

Why is the National Health Institute funding the Chinese Communist Party-backed Peking University?

$21 million in funding. (Thread 🧵)

$7.47 million dollar in tax payer money sent to the CCP university in the Haidian District in Beijing China since 2010, and $15 million approved by the Biden Administration that was awarded this year. @DOGE_NIH

Sources: @DataRepublican website, CNN NPR and @usaspending special thank you to both tagged accounts for providing awesome tools.


The Chinese Communist Party connections with Peking University were publicly know as early as 2020, as reported by NPR.

“From 2013 to 2017, at least 109 universities unveiled their first-ever charters, affirming party leadership, according to NPR's analysis.”

“The new charters effectively hand the party ultimate control over the schools' administration, mirroring how the party dominates government agencies.

NPR specifically named Peking University, Renmin University, and Nanjing University, noting they have “a prominent international studies program jointly administered with Johns Hopkins University.”
@DOGE

Part 3 of 3
On the path of money from PATH - it eventually landed with Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc - which also received $93.9 million in federal grants.

Among the board members are Bill and Chelsea Clinton, and there is a nest of related NGOs under CHAI - for a different countries (read thread for more)

Thank you to the diligent hard work of @DataRepublican for the tools to find this. She has been calling out funding to the Clintons and others for a long time.

CHAI reported revenues of $228 million with a grant out flow of just $30 million.

$4 million for trustees
$77.1 million in salaries
$4.7 million in 401k
$22.3 million in employee benefits
$7 million in conferences
$20.7 million in travel

Every penny counts: US tax payers funded $89 million in grants related to Disinformation and/or censorship.

As you go through the thread below, you start to realize why government is fighting to hold on to these. From manipulating world politics, to Russian disinformation:

Congress has long passed laws allowing this to happen legally with no accountability.

This money, being spent in their districts, incentivizes congress to vote yes. Many will run on slogans like “I got $ in funding for our state’s colleges and universities”

What they won’t say what it was used for:

- $23.5 million to Covid “disinformation” with a specific focus on migrants and to “Essential Workers and Undocumented Individuals”

- $575,000 for journalists to study journalist to spot fake news

- $7.2 million centered around media disinformation in the United States.

- $43.2 million to COVID misinformation

-$1.2 million misinformation related to a ban on menthol cigarettes

-$37.3 million centered around misinformation in foreign elections

-$133k for kids to attend disinformation camp

Below is a thread showing some of the disinformation/censorship grants that were awarded under the previous administration. $22.4 million went to one misinformation/disinformation program. The money was divided (after paying themselves) to seven subgroups, one specifically targeting Undocumented individuals

How did they do it? By paying “trusted influencers” now you understand the social media push.

And $1.1 million to University of Hawaii to spend in California to study undocumented workers to understand disinformation - this grant is specifically to collect information and data.

A lot of grants have made me shake my head, but these absolutely piss me off.

(Sensitive topic below)

Please be aware what your children are being asked at school and more importantly on social media.

And, for the love of God @DOGE please recommend ending these studies immediately. @DOGE_HHS @DOGE_NIH no company should go around parents to talk to teens.

This thread is $9 million in grants for NGOs to target teenagers related to anal sex. Please open and read them all, this is shocking to say the least.

@DataRepublican thank you for the research tool, but I’m angry I found this. The Center for Innovative Public Health Research received $2.8 million tax-payer dollars to purchase social media ads targeting 13-17 year olds over three and a half years to ask about their sexual activity.

And it’s not all the agency has done

Even using the word “recruitment” in their study results 🤬

A new topic crossed my desk today.
Nonoperating 501 (c) (3) - these are tax exempt organizations that receive private funding, but grant money to public entities- in this particular case using funds to supply a public school system in North Carolina with questionable materials.

These organizations do not have to report who their donors are, but donations and contributions are tax deductible.

Meaning an individual can avoid paying income tax, because they donated to a nonprofit charity. This creates a big loophole for money transfers to projects. @DOGE_IRS @DOGE

(See thread 🧵 for more details)

Thank you to @mamabear1245 for the OP With just $7 million in revenue, Peotry Foundation spent more than $18 million according to their IRS 990PF filing.

$5 million in wages and benefits, $2.2 million in professional fees and $5 million in publications (like the one above) and “other expenses”

The USDA, on Monday, posted on its website, an opportunity for participants to remove DEIA and “far-left climate features” from their projects.

What existing projects have those included? Here are 15 threads 🧵 totaling over 1/4 billion dollars $300,350,724.00. 

This is part 3 of 5 on DEIA grants. The first two parts (Dept of Energy and DHHS) are at the bottom of the thread) 

The post subtitles “Applicants Who Wish to Remove Harmful DEIA and Far-Left Climate Features from Project Proposals Have 30 Days to Propose Project Revisions”

The USDA post specifically sites the need to address grants given as part of the “so called Inflation Reduction Act”  @DOGE_USDA @DOGE 

Thank you to @DataRepublican for the assistance with the tools.
Purdue university has 3 awarded grants totaling $8 million that address critical climate initiatives.

123 different NGOs funded nearly a half billion on immigrant work - funded by tax payers.

Click to open the full thread 🧵
- be sure to see slide 2 and 4

I was finally able to extract @DataRepublican tool results into excel to help with calculations.

The next threads are the largest of these.

Look at this spider web of pass through money from the largest of of the immigrant grants - Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights at $80 million.

With 96.9% of their funding coming from tax payers.

Here’s a company with a tale of two tails. Epstein and waste spending

Click to view the whole thread 🧵

On one hand they jumped out with an investigation of any possible involvement with Jeffrey Epstein.

On the other they grifted US taxpayers money with in-house expenditures
IPI collected $2.9 million in grants and another $2 million in gifts.

A many have asked - the International Red Cross received over $3 billion in funding, and as expected there’s massive waste.

Be sure to click and read the whole thread 🧵 for some huge shockers. on a $3 billion budget, only $354 million to food water and medicine. More than $2.8 billion came from US grants (keep in mind this is the International Red Cross not the US Red Cross)

Here is part 2 of Save the Children but waste the money. This is a thread 🧵- for the full take open and read down

Yesterday we looked at $234 million spent on operations. Today where the remaining $676 million went - 🤔 Only $80 million of the $919 million was spent here in the USA. The largest recipient of of that was $6.3 million to their sister company a lobbying agency

Let this sink in: your tax money, $6 million was spent as a charitable donation to a group to beg Congress for more money.

Remember my little rant about Save the Children and how I wish I could find out just how much flowed in and out?

Hands held high clapping for @DataRepublican here’s the thread 🧵 I’ve been waiting to do-> click to see all $900 million in grants - but wait there’s more: