The developer of azidothymidine (AZT), Jerome Horwitz, described it as “so worthless” he didn’t think it was even worth patenting.

AZT is a DNA chain terminator. It’s like chemo, but unlike chemo, AZT was given to patients for years.

When they died of AZT, they died of “AIDS”.

https://twitter.com/youarelobbylud/status/1893708121807425648

“AIDS” isn’t one thing. It’s a cluster of about 30 existing illnesses, many of which are metabolic in nature.

AIDS was a medical rebranding. When AIDS cases trended downward in the ‘90s, they changed the criteria and doubled cases overnight.

Have not yet found a better B complex than this.

• Full spectrum
• High bioavailability
• Methylation support
• Multiple synergistic forms of B1, B9, and B12 (and no cyanocobalamin)
• D-ribose
• Total absence of excipients
For 10% off ThiActive B, use code TAKETHIAMINE

objectivenutrients.com/products/thiac…

That’s a feature, not a bug.

There are exactly 0 Phase 3 double-blind vaccinated-unvaccinated (VU) RCTs for CDC-recommended childhood vaccines.

They will never be conducted.

https://twitter.com/akriegman/status/1861230296949235840

Double-blind is unethical because parents allowing the study would have strong opinions on which group their kids are sorted into.

Doubly unethical because we pre-suppose vaccines saves lives.

This convenient dilemma allows for only objectively worse epidemiological studies.

“Calories in, calories out.”

You’ve surely heard this phrase if you’ve spent any time in the health space. You’ve probably heard it if you’ve spent no time in the health space. This oversimplification of the body’s divine complexity is a relic of outdated nutritional pop-science, and it’s time for it to be thoroughly debunked.

Preamble

I would never outright deny CICO—it can certainly be a useful tool in someone’s weight loss journey. My issue with CICO is the absolutism and rigidity in failing to acknowledge how much it can vary.

When an adult is struggling to lose weight despite eating less food than is recommended for their height, they’re told either “you’re counting wrong” or “just eat less”. What is seldom considered is whether or not that person has a metabolic problem. As we will see, this is very often the case.

What you eat matters just as much as how much you eat.[1] The goal is to increase basal metabolic rate—or “calories out”—not to perpetually decrease “calories in”.

Overview

● Metabolic rate has been decreasing for over a century[2][3]
● Average body temperature has been decreasing for over a century[4]
● Daily energy expenditure has declined over the past 3 decades due to decreased basal metabolic rate—not reduced activity[5]
● We consumed more food in the past yet we were thinner[6][7][8]
● Different macronutrients yield different amounts of ATP
● Different macronutrient ratios impact hormonal profile, which in turn influences both metabolic rate and body composition[9][10]
● We can ballpark “calories in”, but we can’t definitively know what happens between that and “calories out” without understanding all the metabolic pathway variance that can occur along the way
● Counting calories is useful only as a gauge of current basal metabolic rate, but it must be understood that this is subject to change
● Excessive caloric restriction slows metabolism and makes fat gain more likely upon return to maintenance[11]
● Some people would benefit from simply eating less while others would be much better served focusing on increasing basal metabolic rate with intentional daily choices CICO and thermodynamics

“We are currently expending about 220 calories per day less for males and 122 calories per day less for females than people of our age and body composition were in the late 1980s. These changes are sufficient to explain the obesity epidemic in the USA.”[12]
—John Speakman (@johnspeakman4), biologist

CICO absolutists will say that weight loss and gain come down to “thermodynamics”, yet the graphs of body temperature and basal metabolic rate (BMR) steadily decreasing every decade seem to be lost on them.

According to a study in Metabolism Journal, a drop in body temperature of one degree Celsius is equal to a 10-13% reduction in metabolic rate.

Thermodynamics is not reducible to elementary math. In fact, as we’ll see, “a calorie is a calorie”—and CICO, by extension—violates the second law of thermodynamics because of variances in metabolic efficiency.

The more time I’ve had to sit with the stalemate outcome of the CICO/BMR debate, the more I see it as indicative of the differences in how we see health, sickness and the human body overall. Ray’s entire body of work opposed the rate of living theory and genetic determinism: the idea that we have a predetermined amount of heart beats, cell divisions, that we’re destined for illnesses no matter what we do between birth and a diagnosis.

This post may as well have been made in a lab for me personally.

Let's debunk it point by point.

https://twitter.com/disgracedprop/status/1838056172110430508

1. "Sudden proliferance of hypothyroidism—a real but extremely rare condition—"

Hypothyroidism used to be diagnosed by symptoms and had an estimated prevalence of 40% in the '40s and '50s--when we were skinny.

That didn't change because we got healthier--in fact we're sicker by almost every metric now. That changed because of a faulty test called the PBI test, and was amplified by pharmaceutical companies when Levothyroxine (T4 monotherapy) became the popular thyroid supplement for those "rare" hypothyroid patients.

After it was found that the PBI test was flawed in the '60s, this pernicious idea that "only 5% of people are hypothyroid" never changed. In fact, our current thyroid labs still retroactively deem hypothyoid people "normal" by widening the ranges to fit this erroneous PBI-based percentage.

As Ray Peat points out, if you took any other blood biomarker and gave it as wide a range as we give TSH (an indicator of thyroid status), you'd have "normal" blood sugar levels ranging from the level at which we see convulsion and death into the low-diabetic range... and we'd call that "normal". We'd have the low cholesterol ranges associated with cancer and strokes or levels as high as 400 mg... and we'd call that "normal" too.

Not only this, but blood biomarkers are just a small glimpse into what's going on in the body--they fail to indicate what's happening at the cellular or tissue level. Making simple bloodwork the end-all-be-all with anything regarding health is incredibly myopic and naive.

People ab so lutely flip out when you tell them fasting is bad for them. Sunk-cost fallacy on display. “You mean I suffered for nothing?!” Lol “Kills cancer”
The shift away from glucose oxidation to fat oxidation that comes with fasting creates a precancerous “Warburg-Randle cycle” as coined by @haidut.

“Autophagy”
Being euthyroid means more autophagy. Fasting (starving) means non-specific autophagy and low metabolism.

1) Metabolic rate is decreasing.

2) Average body temp is decreasing.

3) In ‘41, 2500 cal were recommended for *sedentary* 150 lb men. 3000 cal were recommended for moderately active.

4) We consumed more sugar in 2000, yet we were thinner.

It’s a metabolic problem.

https://twitter.com/fischerking64/status/1789817446037172290

Seed oils slow the metabolic rate in multiple ways, and our consumption of them has been increasing almost 1:1 with the increased rate of obesity.

Some highlights relating to Georgi’s use of B vitamins / high dose thiamine therapy

https://twitter.com/raypeatfan/status/1782940005846921546

Biotin deficiency can cause aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect) with increased fat synthesis (Marshall, et al., 1976)

𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿?

Why are we so bad at treating it?

Why do some tumors spontaneously regress?

What can we do to lessen our chances of getting cancer?

𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 “𝙄𝙩’𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙣𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙮 50 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨 𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙒𝙖𝙧 𝙤𝙣 𝘾𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙧 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙙, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙮𝙚𝙩 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙜𝙣𝙤𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙙𝙮𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚.[1]
𝘐 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 $500 𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 1970,[2] 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘱 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘳 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦. 𝘐𝘧 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘶𝘣𝘵𝘦𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘧 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 530 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦[3] 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴.”
—Mark Sloan

In the year 1900, 1 in 20 people would get cancer.

By 1970, 1 in 10.

By 2000, 1 in 3.

As @Outdoctrination has pointed out, if more people are getting cancer because we live longer, then why are cancer rates going up at every age group?

If we are winning this war, why have youth cancer rates increased 30% since the ‘70s?[4]

1 repost = 1 thiamine fact 1. Thiamine was discovered by Christiaan Eijkman in 1897, isolated in 1926 by Barend Jansen and Willem Donath, and first synthesized by Robert Williams in 1936.

Gardasil vaccine was a total disaster.

Here’s some information from the book “HPV Vaccine on Trial”

https://twitter.com/TakeThiamine/status/1767399133936279764

Like most vaccines, clinical trials for Gardasil did not use a placebo. They used other, older vaccines or solutions containing toxic adjuvants/surfactants.

HIV, “AIDS”, AZT, and Pharma Lies

https://twitter.com/TakeThiamine/status/1658909075487461376

𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵 𝗗𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝘆

How one B vitamin can treat many metabolic issues…

IBD, SIBO, POTS, CFS, MS, sleep apnea, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, autism, fibromyalgia, diabetes, dysautonomia, cancer

… and how to safely use this therapy for yourself. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲’𝘀 𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗺

Thiamine, or vitamin B1, is often reduced to its status as “the carb-burner” B vitamin, but it is so much more.

This B vitamin is a cofactor in several key metabolic processes relating to brain function, heart and circulation, nerve signal transmission, and digestion. It has also been shown to have non-coenzyme effects, such as regulation of other enzymes, as well as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.

𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗺, 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱:
𝘍𝘶𝘦𝘭 + 𝘖𝘹𝘺𝘨𝘦𝘯 + 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘺𝘴𝘵 = [𝗘𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 = 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲]

𝗚𝗹𝘂𝗰𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗺:
1. Glycolysis
2. Pyruvate oxidation✧
3. The Krebs cycle✧
4. Electron transport chain
✧these are thiamine-dependent

Step 1 is anaerobic, meaning it occurs without oxygen. Steps 2-4 are aerobic, meaning they need oxygen to work.

The vast majority of ATP is produced in the electron transport chain, with products of the Krebs cycle. If a single step is blocked, which is what happens when there's not enough thiamine, then metabolism falls back to an inefficient, primordial, and 𝗽𝗿𝗲-𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 mode of energy production.

Thiamine (and magnesium) are needed for an enzyme called pyruvate dehydrogenase✧ (PDH). PDH is what makes acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl CoA). Without acetyl CoA, there is no entry into the Krebs cycle.

Thiamine is also needed for alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase✧ (α-KGDH), which is needed to keep the Krebs cycle running.

𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗻𝘇𝘆𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸:

✧𝗣𝘆𝗿𝘂𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗵𝘆𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘀𝗲, which plays a central role in the breakdown of sugar
✧𝗮𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗮-𝗞𝗲𝘁𝗼𝗴𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗵𝘆𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘀𝗲, part of the Krebs cycle where sugar, fats, and protein make energy
✧𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱-𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗵𝘆𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘀𝗲, necessary for processing of BCAAs
✧𝟮-𝗢𝘅𝗼𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗵𝘆𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘀𝗲, involved in the breakdown of amino acids like lysine
✧𝟮-𝗵𝘆𝗱𝗿𝗼𝘅𝘆𝗮𝗰𝘆𝗹-𝗖𝗼𝗔 𝗹𝘆𝗮𝘀𝗲, involved in the oxidation of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)
✧𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘀𝗲, which maintains antioxidant defenses and repairing damage

Posts like this get made daily and I think of people in my DMs suffering with debilitating chronic illnesses while eating perfect diets. Dead giveaway of someone who’s never had a complex problem to solve.

https://twitter.com/casbrad/status/1762255152097186205

Maybe metronidazole made you deficient in thiamine which destroyed metabolism by down-regulating PDH and α-KGDH.

Maybe your doctor put you on accutane and tetracyclines which completely destroyed your microbiome, ability to deactivate cortisol, and ability to make bile acids.

We went from diagnosing 30-40% of Americans as hypothyroid in the ‘40s to only 1-5% now because of an inaccurate test.

We also went from prescribing T3:T4 in a 1:4 ratio to prescribing isolated synthetic T4.

https://twitter.com/rizzenhouse/status/1671702090819969026

I think it’s pretty apparent that metabolic health has only declined since the ‘40s, so it should be clear that 1-5% figure is wrong.

In case you’re not convinced:

Oxidative metabolism made simple (1) 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗰 𝗴𝗹𝘆𝗰𝗼𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀
(2) 𝗽𝘆𝗿𝘂𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
(3) 𝗞𝗿𝗲𝗯𝘀 𝗰𝘆𝗰𝗹𝗲
(4) 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻

Through cellular respiration, we take one molecule of glucose and end up with some CO2, some water, and a best-case scenario of 38 molecules of ATP—the energy currency of the mitochondria. Some textbooks say 36, but the key takeaway is that the majority is produced at the end, which is why it’s crucial we avoid bottlenecks in the process.

As the name “respiration” implies, oxygen is crucial to every step after anaerobic glycolysis. These processes involve the transfer of oxygen atoms, hydrogen atoms, and electrons, known as “reduction-oxidation” processes, or more simply, “redox”.

“𝗢𝗜𝗟𝗥𝗜𝗚”
Oxidation Is Losing (electrons)
Reduction Is Gaining (electrons)

How do EMFs harm the body?

Commit these to memory:

→𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲-𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗰𝗶𝘂𝗺 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹𝘀 (VGCCs)

→𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘅𝘆𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲

Calcium is the most abundant mineral in your body, it makes up about 2% of your body weight. It prefers to be outside your cells rather than inside, by a factor of 20,000 - 100,000.

Calcium doesn’t flow freely in and out of cells, instead it’s tightly regulated. This tight regulation of calcium is what EMFs impair.

𝗘𝗠𝗙𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝗩𝗚𝗖𝗖𝘀, 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗰𝗶𝘂𝗺 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗰𝗶𝘂𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀.

When the cell is not properly energized, it swells to absorb water from its surroundings. Potassium and magnesium are flushed out as the cell absorbs calcium and sodium.

Studies have shown that when calcium-channel blocking drugs were used, damage from EMF was greatly reduced.

When excess calcium rushes into your cells, it leads to oxidative stress. This intracellular calcium leads to the production of nitric oxide and superoxide. In appropriate amounts, these are relatively benign, but when produced excessively (such as in the presence of EMFs), they combine to form 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘅𝘆𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲.

Peroxynitrite was only discovered in 1991, meaning many practicing doctors were not taught about it in school. That’s a problem, because peroxynitrite can damage cell membranes[¹], proteins[²], mitochondria[³], stem cells[⁴] and DNA[⁵]. Just a tenfold increase in nitric oxide and superoxide results in a hundredfold increase in peroxynitrite[⁶]. This may explain why electrical workers were shown to have decreased bone density after longterm EMF exposure[⁷].
“Increased intracellular calcium, in association with excess nitric oxide and excitatory amino acids, is involved in several neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington’s chorea, and epilepsy. Magnesium, nicotine, progesterone, and many other substances are known to protect against excitotoxic calcium overload, but there is no coherent effort in the health professions to make rational use of the available knowledge.”

—Ray Peat
𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘋𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦: 𝘏𝘺𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, & 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘤𝘬, 𝘷𝘴. 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘺

Swine flu ‘76 was a viral respiratory disease which caused only 1 death and 13 hospitalizations.

Swine flu vaccine, however, caused:

500 cases of Guillain-Barré,
32 deaths,
400 paralyzations,
and 4,000 other injuries. “As chief of the NIAID’s Clinical Physiology Section of the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, Dr. Fauci was, in 1976, a frontline spectator during the NIH’s bogus swine flu pandemic. That year, a soldier at Fort Dix died of a lung ailment following a forced march…

Peat on T4/TSH blood tests:

“If you took any other biological indicator and gave it such a wide range, you would have, for example, blood sugar ranging from the level at which it causes convulsions and death up into the low-diabetic range and you would call all of those normal.” “Or cholesterol ranging from … the low cholesterol that is associated with cancer and strokes up into the very high … three or four hundred mg of cholesterol. So it’s a very strange thing that thyroid is given such a definition that makes almost everything get called ‘normal’.”

Thomas Verstraeten’s 1999 thimerosal analysis is very interesting.

“At one month of age, high mercury exposures resulted in elevated relative risks for several neurological disorders, including autism”

https://twitter.com/BradCohn/status/1661431325012664320

Summary analysis of 5 Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) compared to control