🧵2026.04.15 - Pam Hemphill Space
Title: DOJ moves to dismiss J6 convictions as if they never happened.

PamHemphill79 (04:10): Good evening, Marine.

Marine4America (04:12): Evening, Pam.

PamHemphill79 (04:14): It seems like nobody comes in until you pop in.

Marine4America (04:18): No, they're listening in the walls for now. So, hey, sorry about nodding off in that last one. We were on our way to winding down and I was already beat, and then next thing I know, I wake up, it's like an hour, hour and a half later and still going. And I have no idea what the hell's happening.

PamHemphill79 (04:44): I would've done it too.

Marine4America (04:47): I get

PamHemphill79 (04:48): It.

Marine4America (04:48): I'm giving myself a heart out by 1:00 AM tonight, but

PamHemphill79 (04:53): Oh no, let's try to keep it under that. We don't need to be up that late.

Marine4America (04:59): I mean, I'm up a lot of the time anyway, but I have been working a lot these past couple weeks too. I've been juggling a lot, man. Things kind of went off when I fell asleep because I am seeing some shit all over the place.

PamHemphill79 (05:18): I

Marine4America (05:18): Dunno.

PamHemphill79 (05:18): Yeah, it's crazy. Well, I got the clip. I don't know if you saw. Yeah, you did. You read about the tricks they used when we're trying to debate with them or talk with them?

Marine4America (05:30): Yeah.

PamHemphill79 (05:32): Is there a way you could play that when enough people come in?

Marine4America (05:40): I can try. I don't know how,

PamHemphill79 (05:41): It's not very long.

Marine4America (05:42): Yeah, it's not. I can try.

PamHemphill79 (05:45): Do you have a computer next to you?

Marine4America (05:47): I do. Lemme see.

PamHemphill79 (05:51): I mean those, he calls 'em tricks. I call 'em tactics, but they fit so good. I mean, I was like, oh my God, I know this, but I didn't know how to put it the way he was putting it because Exactly. I think a

Marine4America (06:05): Lot of you get tripped up.

PamHemphill79 (06:08): We see them doing that every time they come in here.

Marine4America (06:19): I'm trying to find it. Hang on. Yeah, there's this whole situation with Sandy that I was not even aware of until after I looked back on the space. So I just think maybe it's best if, I mean, I don't really want to stick my nose in people's real lives like that too deeply, so I'd be careful with

PamHemphill79 (06:50): Yeah, me too.

Marine4America (06:51): I think we should stick with the January 6th stuff. That's what we know best. Hey,

PamHemphill79 (06:58): Exactly.

Marine4America (07:00): Let me find this. Oh, you posted it, right?

PamHemphill79 (07:05): Yeah. Let's see. Should I put it in the blue bubble

Marine4America (07:10): Bubble? Yeah. You go ahead and do that, I think. Oh, I got it here. Oh, yeah. Shared a couple of them. The five cult debate tactics they use. Yeah,

PamHemphill79 (07:33): That's it.

Marine4America (07:35): This guy's got a goofy thumbnail. Six minutes long.

PamHemphill79 (07:39): I've got the list. The strawman, what abouts it? What about him? But what about, what is, what's that other one called

Marine4America (07:51): At homan?

PamHemphill79 (07:53): At homan? Slippery slopes. Policy burden of proof flip.

Marine4America (08:01): So these are pretty common things that it's rhetoric and everybody kind of employs these things and that's what makes some people so dangerous. The kind of thing that where when somebody says, oh, both sides do that. They're kind of right. These are things that you would find. And even in a debate club, you go over 'em like ad hominem, and a lot of times you'll hear somebody say, what I say is an ad hominem when I call them stupid. And there's a difference between an ad homonym and just insulting somebody. What I'll often do is I'll just insult somebody and then I would love to sit down and explain exactly why their argument is stupid. There's a difference between that and just trying to substitute and say, no, your argument is wrong because you're stupid. And that's the difference. There's all kinds of tricks. And Ryan seems to have studied the fucking fallacy. He's got the cheat sheet on command, so every time he's up here, and that's why I kind of trample over him. I think it's disgusting. I really do think these people are traitors and the way they just kind of have this decentralized system of sending it up the chain, the propaganda chain, and they are rewarded for it. So I mean, what can we do to fight that? I have no idea, but can pointed out,

PamHemphill79 (09:34): Just keep putting out the facts. It doesn't matter.

Marine4America (09:41): That's true.

PamHemphill79 (09:42): I mean, people know. I think they know. Yeah. Do you hear this? You can't change people. You're not going to change. It's not going to

Marine4America (09:54): Happen. No. That's when you try to lead by example. And I realize I don't lead by example when I'm in here. I am on the attack, but you

PamHemphill79 (10:06): All disinformation, you call it what it is. That's not factual.

Marine4America (10:12): Some stuff needs to be attacked like that. When people like Brian are saying, oh, it's a good thing that we cut all of cancer research because of some random thing from 2015. It's like, what the fuck does that even mean? And now we're arguing over some bullshit. It's gotten so far away from us. It's like, well, cancer research has gone so fuck.

PamHemphill79 (10:36): Yeah, that was ridiculous. And the bombing on the schools in Iran, that was ridiculous.

Marine4America (10:43): And they'll nitpick because what I just said, how cancer research being gone, they'll say, well, technically it's not gone because they'll point to some trace remnants and they'll say, technically the school wasn't bombed because the target wasn't the school. It was the shrapnel that killed the children. So they split hairs at these things and say, aha, we got you. You were wrong. But they missed the point where we're like, well, are we in a fucking word? What is happening? Nobody knows what's happening. And this constant sane washing of bullshit is so tired. People are tired of it.

PamHemphill79 (11:20): I know. I'm getting so burned out with this, been in it as long as I have and a lot of you and a of others, but I think it's okay. We got to take a break sometimes and just take care of ourselves. Try not to get caught up in resentments. And yeah,

Marine4America (11:41): That's why with Portland, I'm honestly thinking all these anti-ice people, Hey, I'm all for your first amendment. I'll support that all day, but don't get in the way of a good thing because they're shooting themselves in the foot right now. I think. I don't know. That's again, I don't want to put my nose where it doesn't belong, but the throwing of the dildos, I'll point that out. It's like that does nothing. And it just, people laugh at it and they don't take anything seriously and it just gives the worst kind of people more grounds to start stupid shit. And then that puts that propaganda magnifying glass on it. And that's the game right now. The game right now I think should be keep your head down because they're tripping over themselves.

PamHemphill79 (12:28): What brought the most publicity, and I think everybody was really behind it, was when the frogs started.

Marine4America (12:41): And I think that was a good move at the time because it did show that first bit of protesting. It's like, well, they are goofy. They're not trying to overrun the government here. No one is going to take them seriously. And that's kind of the strength of a peaceful protest, right? They are goofy. And of course they're going to take the bait and be like, oh, look at these people. Look at how unserious these people are because easy bait. But it's like, well, that is the right to be stupid and cringey and be loud against the government, even if it's a little misguided that a lot of it's not. Same with January 6th vindication on that shit. Oh, why do you bring that up all the time? Why do you bring that up all the time? Because fucking because look at that. Our government is now pushing to clear people of sedition, which is as close to treason as you could possibly fucking get. Yeah,

PamHemphill79 (13:51): Exactly.

Marine4America (13:53): No, there's no both sides here.

PamHemphill79 (13:57): Well, it needs the whole army out. Oath keepers and rest of those proud boys, of course, stand back, stand by.

Marine4America (14:07): They made shirts of that immediately after you said that.

PamHemphill79 (14:10): They did. That's right. Yeah.

Marine4America (14:18): I was looking more into this because I was ringing Enrique Tarrio's Bell a lot, and I'm like, you know what? I need to go deeper and read the indictments for myself because I have skimmed the shit before. But if I am going to be punching up at him in these spaces, I should read a little more and see what these cases are. And Jesus fucking Christ, these people belong to. They deserve to. They should be in jail. They should still be in jail. Fuck. Sorry, Pam, but

PamHemphill79 (14:58): Oh no, don't apologize to me. I agree with you.

Marine4America (15:01): I get a lot of people were misled but disgusting. What we allow now, the fact that we okayed the shit.

PamHemphill79 (15:15): We got a J six who trying to run for governor in South Carolina, and somebody called me and tell me about the interview he had with him, and they want me to come on their show because he says, we got to have somebody sharing the facts about January 6th because all we're getting is this propaganda and lies. Can you imagine? They're running for governors one in Portland too, and you look at their criminal arrest, what it was. Oh my God, it's so scary.

Marine4America (15:50): Yeah. The real gang now is to just legitimize themselves.

PamHemphill79 (15:58): I think that back, it's not governor of South Carolina, it's House of Reserv representatives. Yeah,

Marine4America (16:05): House reps.

Marine4America (16:13): My fucking MAGA coworker, her name is actually Karen, even Trump during Trump won, where it was kind of fun for her to be like, oh, he's just trolling. He's just trolling. And by the first week of working there, I was like, yeah, this is kind of bullshit. And she's like, I'll come out here, snowflake. I was like, what the fuck? You don't even know me. It's pretty wild. And that just set the tone for our entire working relationship and things were better during the Biden years because we could make fun of him together. That was fun. And then now Trump too, and January 6th, really. I mean, that was messed up, but afterwards I was like, all right, she's not budgeting on this and she doesn't want to talk about it anymore. So I just joined in and we were like, all right, well, at least we can punch up together, Biden together, because bullshit's bullshit. It is what it is. And then Trump too happened, and now she doesn't want to talk about anything ever. And fucking after the tariffs we're in shipping and business has been fucked. Everything's fucked. And she just looks at me like, wow, things are slow. Huh? Wow. I'm like, yeah, you think, what do you think is happening? She's like, I don't know. I'm like, yeah, you don't know. All right. Looking ridiculous.

PamHemphill79 (17:44): Put your head in the same,

Marine4America (17:46): Nothing's

PamHemphill79 (17:46): Happening. It's okay.

Marine4America (17:51): She fucking bought her house in 1970, whatever, got married whenever she checked out of life after that.

PamHemphill79 (18:01): We talking about again, who are you talking about?

Marine4America (18:03): My coworker Karen. And she's just like, I think she just represents a lot of MAGA coworkers across America, to be honest.

PamHemphill79 (18:20): Yeah. Yep. They're just watching the Fox News,

Marine4America (18:27): And that's the thing, I can't even bring it up. I wonder what she's thinking now because I know she loved Tucker Carlson just a few years ago, and she followed this whole track, but now all these people are ostracized from MAGA as well, so I have no idea. That's the thing. She doesn't want to talk about any of it, so it's too uncomfortable. She hedged way too much with all these figures, and they're all just fallen by the wayside.

PamHemphill79 (18:56): Yeah. Well, Trump's created it. I hope people do study what they're talking about, those tricks that they use trying to talk to you. Oh my God, they use them in here for sure. Trying to race what happened on January 6th by getting rid of these convict. Oh my God. They're just rewriting history, right? God, this would empower 'em to think they could do whatever they want now. It's scary.

Marine4America (19:45): I mean, though, they're getting in their own way. I think even with this God attorney general wine mom, what's her name? She's the one who moved to dismiss a lot of the convictions, right? Is that what happened?

PamHemphill79 (20:02): Oh yeah. Yes, yes.

Marine4America (20:03): Yeah. Yeah. Wine mom, attorney general wine mom. She just seems like always wine drunk to me. I don't know. That's what I always called her.

PamHemphill79 (20:15): I'm a little confused. So what's going to happen? It hasn't actually happened yet, or does it have to go?

Marine4America (20:21): They motion for it. Lemme look it up also. Lemme do a sound check. Can you hear this, Pam?

PamHemphill79 (20:26): Yeah, I hear you will.

Marine4America (20:28): No, no way. They do. I decided to do some research on the methods. The cult is to argue against facts, logic, and

PamHemphill79 (20:38): Once Recording (20:39): A little bit louder, lose all their power in every conversation you have in the future. Here are the five tricks the Trump cult uses to try and exhaust you and make sure a real argument. Argument never happens. One, the

PamHemphill79 (20:49): Strawman stop

Recording (20:53): Says, paid America and want to see it destroyed. You never said that. How about that? But now you're defending your patriotism instead of talking about war, the original point is completely forgotten. And then they're nodding like they won the conversation. They argue against something you never said. This is called the strawman vacy. They take your actual argument, replace it with something dumber and scarier, and argue against that fake version. Instead, in 1960, psychologist Peter Wasson at the University College of London found that the brain does not look for truth. It looks for the fastest way to protect what it already believes. So their brain is not asking if you are right, their brain is asking how to make you look wrong. You're questioning the Iran war, you're siding with the enemy, bring up Trump's criminal conviction. You have TDS ask about deportations, the foreign prisons, and they'll claim you want open borders. They never argued with what anyone actually says. They just try to make sure that your argument never gets heard. Two, what bism you bring up. Trump firing his attorney general. They say, what about Hillary's emails? You mentioned that Iran War started without Congress. They say, what about Biden? They never answer a single question because they know they can't answer it. This is called What about is? We are all very familiar with this one. Instead of responding to your point, they drag a completely different issue into the conversation to make you forget what you were talking about. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman at Princeton University found that the brain can only track a limited number of ideas at the same time. The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. No.

Marine4America (22:10): Okay, so can you hear all that, Pam?

PamHemphill79 (22:15): Yeah.

Marine4America (22:15): Okay.

PamHemphill79 (22:16): We could just talk. That happens all the time.

Marine4America (22:18): Yeah. So what he just said right there about splitting their attention. So we see that a lot with the Epstein files. We're like, at the bare minimum, we should just investigate who's mentioned, who's involved the most, and they'll say, well, why didn't Biden investigate during his years? I'm like, truly, maybe I wasn't prepared to fucking answer that. That throws me off. They're like, aha, that they had trounce on that. Now we forgot the whole question. Why aren't the people in power right now investigating? That's the trick. I'll move on. I'll move on.

PamHemphill79 (22:56): And you have to be knowledge. Oh,

Marine4America (22:58): Go on.

PamHemphill79 (22:58): Knowledgeable. You have to be knowledgeable too. Why? And some people aren't. I'm not knowledgeable. I don't know everything. Of course, I know the answer to that one because they couldn't. But you know what I'm saying? We don't always know the information and they're hoping that we don't.

Marine4America (23:20): That's what I mean. Normal people aren't prepared to fucking debate suit and tie Rhein with his little profile picture. You know what I mean? Most people aren't actually prepared to answer that. A lot of the people who go to even something as tepid as a no King's protest, they're just there to express like, Hey, I disagree with how things are going. And that's really it. And when some idiot with a microphone who claims to be a journalist goes, excuse me. Excuse me. What policy do you actually disagree with? And they're like, oh, I don't know. And they're like, ah. They can't even answer these crazy leftists. They don't even know what they're protesting. We have no king. And then they just, that's the strawman. They use these unprepared people as living straw men and they've manufactured an entire industry out of it.

PamHemphill79 (24:05): Yeah, what you're talking about is on this video. So

Marine4America (24:09): Yeah, I'll move on.

PamHemphill79 (24:10): Charlie Cook? Yeah.

Marine4America (24:12): Oh yeah. Here we go. So he says, here we go.

Recording (24:15): The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. Now, if you add a third and a fourth problem, your brain can't keep up and loses the original thread they use. What about him to exploit the brain's weakness on purpose? They do this because they saw other people do it and it worked. It's not like they have some grand plan or anything. Every time they say, what about they're not making a point, they're running away from yours. What about him is not a defense? It's a weak person's confession that they have no argument. Three ad homan attack. You say Trump is breaking the law. They say you have Trump derangement syndrome and you hate America. Trump is still breaking the law. But now the conversation is about whether you are crazy instead of what Trump actually did. This is called an ad homan attack. To put it plainly, they're just insulting you instead of answering any questions, the goal is to destroy your credibility before your argument even gets evaluated. Psychologist Robert Cialdini at Arizona University found that people do not evaluate arguments in a vacuum. We decide whether to listen based on who is talking. Ad hominin makes the audience question whether you are even worth listening to before they engage with what you said. When they cannot argue facts, they come after you instead. And the moment you start defending yourself, the argument is over and they win. For the slippery slope fallacy, you say, the government should not be able to deport American citizens without due process. They say you want to let criminals pour into the country. You said nothing about criminals, but now everyone is arguing about something you never brought up. This is called the slippery slope fallacy. They take one reasonable idea and claim it will automatically lead to the most extreme outcome imaginable. No evidence, no logical steps. They're just creating fear.

Marine4America (25:41): They see that a lot with, like I say, there's lots of general reasons somebody might be protesting. Even somebody might be protesting against ice, depending on how local you're getting, there might genuinely be a case where somebody's rights were violated in some way and that can't be shown until after they actually get their day in court, which takes time. So they're just advocating for that person. George Ttes. There's a couple people I know it's not like rampant, but there's lots of genuine reasons why somebody might be objecting to how things are being handled, and they will jump on you like, well, why do you want to protect illegals? And that's not what I fucking said.

PamHemphill79 (26:27): Exactly. And that's not why we're protesting ice either. It's the behavior of ice. What we're they acting like Estoppels instead of the ice that we knew in the past.

Marine4America (26:39): Yeah, that's what I mean. There's just lots of general reasons and people are going to have to account for that because it's starting to add up. And people with even more common sense are seeing that too. And people with one fucking brain cell like Tommy can't get it. So they're like, why

Recording (26:58): Do you want to protect illegals? Why do you want to protect illegals?

Marine4America (27:03): So you don't know what you're talking about. Okay, I don't think you've, all right. Nevermind. Let's see what else to discuss. This

Recording (27:12): Psychologist, Paul Ekman at the University of California San Francisco found that fear overrides rational thinking faster than any other emotion. Once your brain perceives a threat, it stops evaluating evidence and starts looking for an exit. The slippery slope is designed to trigger the fear response before your brain can ask whether the threat is even real scare people enough, and they stop thinking. And people who stop thinking are easy to control, just ask Fox News. Newsmax five, the burden of proof flip. Charlie Kirk built his entire career on this trick. He would show up to college campuses, make wild claims with no evidence and demand that students disprove him on the spot. When students couldn't disprove him, Kirk declared victory and forced the student to give up the mic. He called it owning the libs. It was not a real debate. It was an ambush on unprepared kids. This is called the burden of proof. Flip. Person making the claim is always responsible for proving the claim, but Kirk and every conservative like him make wild claims with no evidence and then demand that you disprove those claims. Crazy, right? And here's why. You can never win. You show them a court ruling. They claim the judge is corrupt. You show them a study, the science is corrupt. You show them a news report, the outlet take news. Every piece of evidence, brain just gets added. The conspiracy,

Troll (28:18): Get her out of here.

PamHemphill79 (28:21): I got rid of him.

Marine4America (28:23): Oh, well, that's what it's down to now. It's just that

PamHemphill79 (28:30): What he was just sharing there. Isn't that so true? Oh my God. It happens

Marine4America (28:35): All

PamHemphill79 (28:35): The time when I'm down there.

Marine4America (28:38): What's your desire?

PamHemphill79 (28:40): Protests in Portland. People will walk away after they've talked to 'em and say, oh my God, my head's spinning. And mine would too, and I knew what was happening, but I didn't know how to point out the tactics. I know the tactics of the criminal mind, but they're very similar. But that's exactly, I can't believe it. I just identified with that one. A hundred percent.

Marine4America (29:04): Yeah. There's another minute left.

Recording (29:09): The outlet is fake news. Every piece of evidence you bring just gets added to the conspiracy. There's no evidence they'll accept, because accepting evidence was never part of the deal. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman found that once someone believes something, their brain treats every piece of supporting evidence as proof and every piece of contradicting evidence as part of the coverup or conspiracy. Kirk was never really debating anyone. He was running a scam in a real debate. The person making the claim has to prove their claim to be true. Kirk never proved anything. He just demanded you disprove him and called it a win when you couldn't. That is not a debate that is a weak scam and only worked on kids who are under 20 years old. Most of these people have no idea what they're actually saying. They saw it on TikTok or they heard it on Fox News. They repeated it to you and called it an argument. Actually trying to win a debate. They're trying to feel superior to someone they are secretly intimidated by. That is all owning the libs ever was deeply insecure. People using borrowed tricks to feel powerful for five minutes. Now that you know these tricks, you'll never have to fall for them again. They're what weak people use to try and trick smart people into arguing. When you're not smart enough to win a real argument, you kind of have to trick people.

Marine4America (30:10): Yeah, it's the best way to put it.

PamHemphill79 (30:15): Okay, go to the next one.

Marine4America (30:18): Which one was the next one? I'll

PamHemphill79 (30:20): Pull people up in a minute as soon as we're done with this video.

Marine4America (30:23): Which other one did you want?

PamHemphill79 (30:25): That wasn't the last, was it?

Marine4America (30:27): Oh yeah. No, that was the end of the video. It was only six minutes long.

PamHemphill79 (30:31): Oh, burden of proof flip. Okay.

Marine4America (30:33): Yeah, yeah. I had ho Homan burden of proof straw man.

Recording (30:44): Even worth slope fallacy. They take one

Marine4America (30:47): Slippery slope.

Recording (30:50): That's

PamHemphill79 (30:50): Why I want people to

Marine4America (30:51): Learn. I'll post this on the pill.

PamHemphill79 (30:55): Okay. I think it's important to learn this so you don't waste your time. I mean, if you want to have a conversation, they come in here and yell at me and call me names. That's not a conversation. Let's talk about Iran and what the hell's going on and what do you like about it or don't like about it. We don't have to agree, but go into personalities trying to got your moments. It is just a waste of our time.

Marine4America (31:26): Speaking of we have Guyer.

PamHemphill79 (31:30): Yeah. See if he'll be nice. Don't pull into your tactics. We are aware of 'em. We got your number.

Marine4America (31:42): Nick sorter types. It's okay. You're free to speak. It's just us. Oh, did it not go through

PamHemphill79 (32:02): Guy? I don't dunno if you're hearing us, but you're free to talk, but we'll wait until you put this hand up.

Marine4America (32:08): It might be a space thing. It still says there's a request and I don't see the request anymore. I tried to bring 'em up. Maybe try to do it if I invite them. Invite to speak spaces is weird. I think everybody needs a little bit of grace and patience with that.

I didn't realize that @PamHemphill79's old friend Samantha Hager and her husband Joel Hager got arrested.

https://twitter.com/DavidPettinger/status/2040298660836344031

@pamhemphill79 claims that she didn't know those people BUT........................... Let's check the record, shall we?

2020.02.29 - Bernie Sanders event - Idaho MAGA Girls Protest, a member of the far-left group of local Antifa showed up with a Trump/Pence Nazi flag, and then rejoined his Bernie Sanders friends.

https://x.com/TeresaSkaggs5/status/1924985239652196802

2020.03.13 - Breonna Taylor is killed by police during a no-knock raid in Louisville, Kentucky, an event that becomes a catalyst for national Black Lives Matter protests and vigils, including subsequent events in Boise honoring her and other victims of police violence.

How was Pam Hemphill in Idaho in 1992 advertising in the newspaper that she had a Masters Degree in Religion when Pam Hemphill did not graduate from California State at Bakersfield until 1993? This is her LinkedIn: Let's Dig In........ Pam Hemphill purchased Ministry Credentials about the same time that she graduated a Certification program at Cal State-Bakersfield and a Masters of Religion Degree. She then embarked on a multi-state deception that she was qualified to do this:

I can see what Pam Hemphill means when she said that "her problems were of her own making at times".

2025.08.11 - She tells the story of sobriety. (Story).
46 Days after her Lumpectomy:

https://x.com/TeresaSkaggs5/status/1953338279903813936

x.com/i/spaces/1djGX… Don't forget Pam said the police put her back to the same spot. NO THEY DIDN'T, she put herself back to the same spot.

● 2020.06.01 - Pam Hemphill - "You know how this started today, I told them to take that sign off my Liberty Bell and don't be putting down cops. And then they all surrounded me, and I was online".

● 2020.06.01 - Pam Hemphill - "See how she waved to me, she's one of them that cannot stand me. She was surrounding me today, so I keep a little eye on her. Buck up Lester. Just don't tear up our city, that's the only thing I'm asking. You know Protest is Protest, that's your right, we're fighting for the Constitutional Rights, just don't go breaking our windows or anything man. I tell you what, you're in the wrong city. And if you're listening to me, my little devil friend, 'cause I know you probably are. Taking that sign off of my Liberty Bell, 'cause I know there's men that died for that, for our liberty. You're not going to disgrace it. Hold on. Okay, these two ladies right here, the one in the black and the one in the purple, they're really dangerous and unsafe women. I'm telling you right now. And they're walking slow, you've got to keep an eye on these women. I don't have anybody with me. But I'm with some guys that are watching them, so maybe it should be all right." ● 2020.07.07 - Savauge Taylor begged Pam Hemphill to stop escalating the situation on Facebook. He reminded her that they need peacekeepers at a time like this.

● 2020.08.07 - Pam Hemphill sent Cin a message with a picture of Children's face masks and a t-shirt Pam had made directly below them saying "UNMASK CHILDREN". ● 2020.08.10 - Pam Hemphill send Cin a copy from showing Samantha Hager and says "I want to make a video about her. Need all the information you can get me!" ballotpedia.org

● Pam Hemphill a 2020 Timeline 🧵🧵🧵 ● 2020.02.15 - Bloomberg - 2nd Amendment Protest

● Space by: Pam Hemphill
● Name of Space: The beginning of MAGA entitlement to break the law!
● Date: April 20, 2021
● Subjects: Project 2025: Nationwide carry, @cdseghetti claims they are trying to keep women from voting
● URL: x.com/i/spaces/1ynJO…
Speakers in the Space
● @cdseghetti
● @MrDanielGrantK1
● @whatle73795
● @Ingridebap
● @RickAmericus
● @longhaircowboy2 ● Space by: Pam Hemphill
● Name of Space: The beginning of MAGA entitlement to break the law!
● Date: April 20, 2021
● Subjects: Due Process, Assignment to go after the younger voters, push them into civics, the Save Act, poll tax on women. @cdseghetti says fuck her fear and claims they have an urgency on every single level and the fight is now.
● URL: x.com/i/spaces/1ynJO…
Speakers in the Space
● @cdseghetti
● @MrDanielGrantK1
● @whatle73795
● @Ingridebap
● @RickAmericus
● @longhaircowboy2

2025.01.20 - Trump gave all J6ers a pardon and granted clemency to member of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. Pam immediately began claiming that she did not want a pardon and that she planned to turn it down. She had actually been making those claims even before that date.

Pam claims that she is going to move because her probation officer was called. LOL

Apparently Pam ditched Arie, the chihuahua pup she got from the Humane Society, said he was too vicious and she found him another home. She has also said that he was too much for her to handle. (Abandonment, yep, got it)! Pam's former co-host Kevin @RochesterNY585 came by, of course he was treated like shit. What's new? Such a welcoming bunch of people, don't ya think?

Pam Hemphill used her breast cancer, all day, on January 6th and she lied to every officer there. She told this Sargent that they took her breast off. Pam did not have a mastectomy, she had a lumpectomy on November 20, 2020. So they absolutely did not take her breast off. She told two more officers that she had breast cancer surgery before reaching the steps, and again used her breast cancer surgery once reaching the steps. She also pretended that she could not breathe, so that she could do exactly what she tried to do in Boise at Dharma Sushi. (Pam tried to have a George Floyd moment)

Does anyone pay attention the Prosecutor in the J6 cases? I am going to see if I can find the evidence for this one. The case was Pam Hemphill's sentencing hearing on 5/11/2022. Here they point out that Pam's participation in the riot actually succeeded in halting the Congressional certification (yet she was not charged with a felony charge for that, like others were), even though they said she persisted in breaking through police lines.

I'll say one thing, you got off the hook answering questions tonight, more than you would have if I was asking the questions, @PamHemphill79 because you were not charged with even 1/10th of the shit that you did on J6. So let's talk about it. @AshTruthReturns @LouisofMonmouth @IDLibertyDogs @jamesroy_1st @MoniePJ @HelpStopHate @CondemnedUSA @terms1776 @DerrickEvans4WV @ProudArmymom66 @ScamTifaPam @Landofillusion1 On January 5th, you were instigating the crowd, the same way that you did on January 6th and tried to encourage others to push the police and the barricade so that you could confront ANTIFA. The same shit you repeatedly tried to do with BLM in Boise and tried to let others take the blame for what you did.

● In this video you repeated over and over again that you helped break the glass in Boise (you lied to make yourself look like a bad ass to the crowd). You wanted credit for it. The DOJ gave that to you and barred you from the Boise Statehouse for the duration of your probation. You did that to yourself.

● You also injected the name Ammon Bundy several times that night, even though the two of you had already had a falling out back home. You wanted his credibility among protestors. Something you didn't have.

● In this video, you videotaped Ray Epps, you know the man you said that you were never anywhere near. You also blew your vape in his face. This is not the only proof that you were near him that night.

● 20 Jun 2020 - Cin got photos of the car, the plate and the damage to the liberty bell. Pam tried to take credit, but the evidence was on The Idaho Liberty Dogs page.

facebook.com/IdahoLibertyDo…
facebook.com/IdahoLibertyDo… ● 18 Jul 2020 - Pam sent Cin a message telling her that the Police were coming to take photographs of her phone at 10:30 p.m. and that she would be home by 11:30 and needed to talk.

This post is to respond to Pam Hemphill's latest claim against Victoria White. Let's see who has more credibility here.

● Victoria White went to the Stop the Steal rally with friends from Minnesota.
● Pam Hemphill went to the Stop the Steal rally alone from Idaho. 🧵 ● Victoria White attended the rally, listened to Trump's entire speech and was one of the last to leave.
● Pam Hemphill did not attend the rally, did not listen to any of Trump's speech and was one of the first to leave.

20 Jul 2020 - Pam Hemphill decided to make a scene at Dharma Sushi & Thai in Boise, Idaho. Worse than that, she sent out flyers telling people to come there while she did it. Her and her male companion decided to go inside for a soft drink, with no mask even though there was a sign on the door that said that masks were required for entry. Pam had her camera going to make a complete spectacle of the situation. They called the police.

x.com/i/article/1835… ● For some reason Baked Alaska's clip did not post so here it is:

@shipwreckedcrew The San Francisco Examiner
27 Sep 1997

She was on this one! @shipwreckedcrew The Californian
30 Sep 1996

She was on this one:

So, Clarence Thomas said that there is no legality to the appointment of a Special Counsel because the statue expired in 1999. Does that mean that all of these Special Counsels were all illegally appointed because they were appointed from within DOJ instead of by Congress?

● 1999 - John Danforth was appointed by AG Janet Reno to investigate the Waco seige.
● 2003 - Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed by DAG James B. Comey to investigate The Plame affair.
● 17 May 2017 - Robert Mueller was appointed by DAG Rod Rosenstein to take over the FBI's investigation of the Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election that was started by James B. Comey.
● 19 Oct 2020 - John Durham was appointed by AG William Barr to investigate the Origins of the Russia Investigation.
● 18 Nov 2022 - Jack Smith was appointed by AG Merrick Garland to investigate Donald Trump's involvement in the events of January 6, 2021 and the withholding of Documents from NARA.
● 12 Jan 2023 - Robert Hur was appointed by AG Merrick Garland to investigate Joe Biden's mishandling of classified documents while he was Senator and Vice President.
● 11 Aug 2024 - David Weiss was appointed by AG Merrick Garland to investigate Hunter Biden and his 5 year long felony tax evasion charge, illegal foreign lobbying, money laundering and firearm charges. 30 Jun 1999 - The Independent Special Counsel Expires