Eric CIAramella’s Dirty Whistle Profile picture
Physician Gas Passer in real life. Fly in a circus of elephants on twitter; Gator/Buckeye alumnus. Ex Charlestonian/Current Florida Man. Feel a Reckoning coming
13 subscribers
Oct 25 6 tweets 5 min read
I didnt follow this case. The IRS guy who stole Trump's Tax Returns, Charles Littlejohn, pled to ONE COUNT of Unauthorized Disclosure of Tax Records (26 U.S.C. 6 7213(a)(l). He only got 5 years. Did anyone realize the scope of this? HE STOLE >70k. He was required to create a victim's website. Anyone have it? A timeline.Image Here is a little background for anyone interested. He is currently appealing his judgement (law people can he? In his plea it says he cant; I think) The case:
A. He was a subcontractor for the IRS with Booz Allen (Edward Snowden NSA Fame) (Parent Carlyle Group). That is a lot of access.
B. He leaked Trump's Taxes to a media entity (NYT I think)
C. THEN went back and stole more and gave it to them in Sept. Somehow anonymously.
more in next tweetImage
Image
Image
Image
Oct 17 7 tweets 3 min read
FULTON 2020: SIGNATURE VERIFICATION SMOKING GUN? We know know that Fulton didn't do a real signature verification for Nov 2020. Did Vote at Home/ Elections Group ADMIT in an email Fulton didn't do it for the PRIMARY. How involved are these groups? Barron, the head of elections, doesn't even know where the signature verification is done. ( They did do "Signature Verification" for Jan 5) It wasn't done where they announced it. It was partly done at Peachtree, not just State Farm GWCC. These groups operated in the literal shadows with no paper trail, no financial from the county. Grants from Zuckerberg and a Memorandum of Understanding. (It wasn't just Fulton)Image
Image
Image
They broke election law. The laws McBurney is so passionate about. When the signatures didn't match the registration or the absentee ballot application (the law says match both)...they went searching for any signature it sounds liked and likely just created an application. ~30k...That is the amount of rollover the SOS sends. Replacement Theory ? ihttps://x.com/TheAndersPaul/status/1781735715077840896
Sep 4 6 tweets 3 min read
A friendly reminder:
-Raffensperger paid for a signature verification study w UGA and continues to withhold the study
-The GA AG refused to enforce the legally binding mandate for Fulton to comply
-During phone call Ryan Germany promises Trump he will do it.
They are all liars


Image
Image
Image
Image
A compilation on Fulton purposeful incompetence and obfuscation. An aside. 3 election servers go down during Nov. deleting critical election documents
1. Sig verification server w applications which they copied/cropped sigs from
2. Absentee drop box video
3 Election server during recount deleting ballot images and project packages.
Aug 31 6 tweets 2 min read
Doing a little deep dive on USDR (US Digital Response) the Elections Group Partner that helped create the absentee ballot application portal for Fulton County that bypassed the SOS portal. It's interesting to say the least. Stanford. Center for Civic Life. EAC. Harris County... Image Just crazy all the ties to big non profits and GSA. With ties to the GSA and these other groups, they can funnel money to whomever and whenever they want, and it wont be noticed for years. Just create a new non profit, make some IRS extensions on your 990. No one notices.
Aug 9 8 tweets 4 min read
DID FULTON COOK THE DROP BOX BOOKS?

INTERNAL TIME STAMPED EMAIL ATTACHMENTS SHOW THEM CHANGING BY THOUSANDS OVERNIGHT. WHEN & WHY DID THEY CHANGE? THEY DELETED ALL DROP BOX VIDEO BEFORE THE 10/27 SWITCH...
After the change they started recording.

Image
Image
Image
Oh....and there is more.
Organized File attached in next tweet for people who like puzzles..

Is this a ballot balance matrix or and not just an application ballot tracking system? The numbers are very interesting w regards to dates of apps. segmentation in relation to in person voting date of sending of ballots? What is with the equations all over the place? I have some hypothesis. Did they scan early, and scan again with a whole new batch of drop box? Early apps before in person voting certainly look like old drop box totals. Ill go into more later.Image
Jul 28 5 tweets 2 min read
1/2 Interesting. Since people are starting to take notice of The Elections Group. How chummy are they w Fulton County. Before they even started, Rich Barron calls them colleagues. They are being paid by either themselves or Vote at Home Institute. Who funds them? Dark money? Image They are being paid a cool 150/hour. (unclear from email if vote at home is paying them), but vote at home does give money to the GASOS in grants. I bet the other elections workers are jealous. Now who funds vote at home institute with 8 million dollars in 2020?? Well, thats more interesting. This is a non profit. This should have to be disclosed who their donors are. Who is Ascent Media. Well Its run by, you guessed Brian Kemps staff. Thats a nice ad buy there. Who else gives them money more recently? Sam Bankman Fried's SVB Charitable arm and the Tides Foundation. . Look at who they give grants too as well. Very interesting list of cities.Image
Image
Image
Jul 6 6 tweets 5 min read
"Punctuality is the thief of time"
(Dorian Gray selling his soul to feed his hedonistic/aristocratic desires -Oscar Wilde)
-WAS FULTON STILL MESSING W BALLOTS TO MAKE COUNTS WORK..A MONTH AFTER THE 2020 ELECTION? THOUSANDS.
-TIME STAMPED INTERNAL EMAILS SAY LIKELY. WHY? If this has been looked at, I apologize. New to me. There may be a reasonable explanation. Co mingling? Duplication? Poor management Im treading cautiously on this one.Image
Image
The most interesting part of this of this is the shift between election day / provisional to advanced voting. Provisional are handmarked and advanced are bmd QR Ballots so if you duplicated them and switched them out, no one would ever be able to tell. The other part of this, they couldn't document the provisionals in enet. They didn't give credit to the voter. They just threw them into the election day bucket and assigned them to people who were documented in know ink and not enet. When do they do this...When the voter has multiple voter histories, which many recognize as an indicator of fraud warranting further investigation. GA...Nah. A side note. Yes it says unofficial. But would expect unofficial to reflect less votes across the board. not a mixed bag of shifting.
For reference:Image
Image
Image
Image
Jul 4 4 tweets 3 min read
This is truly cult like brainwashing and elder abuse.
As we celebrate our freedoms and liberties w our Families, Here is Dominion employees saying Dominion is more of a family than her own while taking away her mom's freedom. This person ostracizes her mother; accesses and deletes her emails, lies to her, and turns her mom's grandkids against her and then says grandma is dividing the family. The pathology here is real. (1/3)Image So this is kind of serious. This higher up is ranting to the head of Dominion who agrees w her actions. Reminds me of the culture at the FBI. Something doesn't seem nefarious because everyone in a bubble may see an action as justifiable. If Trump = Hitler, election fraud is okay. Right? FBI agrees so they ignore. This employee is so brainwashed she isolates and manipulates her mom emotionally and through withholding things she enjoys until she returns to the family. (this grandma sounds awesome by the way). The worst part is, this employee is wrong on facts too. This person Chastises grandma for minimizing "violence against asians by Trump Supporters." Mom rightfully points It wasnt by Trump supporters and their family is Japanese and Covid was chinese. She goes on about "the truth" in such a binary way despite having inside information at the very least of all the Dominion "bugs" that can be exploited. I rarely redact someone's name, but I am doing it now. Cause if others are as disgusted as I am at how this person treats the elderly and someone she is supposed to love, then others will be too.Image
Image
Image
Image
Jun 11 6 tweets 4 min read
New Doc Dump: Not gonna make much of it. But some interesting things:
-Contractors had access to FBI data (honestly cant make much of it)
-Reporters on the grounds instantly reached out to help identify rioters
-Whats interesting is this Sullivan character is he is charge of DSAC a private sector FBI partnership and data-sharing group under DHS. Involved in embedding themselves in other protests.
-There was a clear language shift from riot to siege and attack
-The narrative on J6+1 from Democrats was to blame Trump for instigating and prosecuting; pressuring the FBI blame Trump.
-In principals meeting; They were collecting CI on J6er's; They needed an EC but were collecting data on members already? Who was and from what sourceImage
Image
Image
Image
Other tidbits.
-(maybe known); only a few lines on pipe bombs. Something happened on Jan 9th. They found a suspect I think (go to last slide for a puzzle)
-Arrested people were flagged in the FBI database..Flagged for what. History? CHS? subcontractor?
Just a very interesting dynamic. Not sure what to make up of it. But there are allegations that they embedded in other protests like occupy wall street. Sullivan also owns his own Private security Company. Not sure timeline just yet.Image
Image
Image
Jun 11 6 tweets 3 min read
So. I Just want answers. This is called a short ballot from Tabulator 729. Next is details showing ballot documented as short on ICC (normally absentee). All the 1st ballots in 729 are SHORT ballots. Duplicated fine

HOW DO DUPLICATED SHORT BALLOTS HAVE DOWN BALLOTS RACES?


Image
Image
Image
Image
I just have been racking my brain over this. There may be an explanation. When a military member requests an absentee instead of an electronic, maybe? But why are these doc'd as SHORT?. This goes w military ballots disappearing. And fake ballots during duplication in Spalding.

Image
Image
Image
Jun 5 6 tweets 5 min read
I tell you what. Fulton Co kids who went into the armed forces are either the most woke ever or they are doing funny stuff w our armed forces. 950-0 Biden.. and accidentally scanned x2? w different overlays. So, these are audit board sheets; meaning envelopes separated already?


Image
Image
Image
Image
So electronic ballots can be duplicated ballots. This doesn't mean you scan the batch sheet twice. Were both counted in totals? ALSO...TO all graphics people. What are the chances you get a fill pattern like this when scanning? Also. Files created with Nitro Pro 11. This normal?

Image
Image
Image
Apr 20 4 tweets 4 min read
We know Fulton didn't signature verify the Nov election. What about Jan 5 runoff? I think the law states Sigs should be compared to REGISTRATION AND BALLOT APPLICATION. Reality? They compare to license in ENET 30k NOT FOUND/DONT MATCH on first pass! Of note Their sig server is decommissioned the day before verification. So is this even possible? ARE ANY VALID IF THEY DONT FOLLOW THE LAW?Image
Image
Image
Image
What is second pass you ask? It was rocket file with absentee applications. So if the server is deleted, what do they compare to? Then there comes the issue with the 60k duplicate registration, pick your signataure? and multiple ballot requests. ERIC teaches counties how to merge voter ids. thousands. And then they make one id inactive.Image
Image
Apr 10 24 tweets 15 min read
1) "SAFEST AND MOST SECURE ELECTION EVER" -CISA Vulnerabilities GA edition. Coup de grâce. Remote access to enet allowing users to assign voters to ballots. Fulton hid investigation behind NDA. This Co is also contracted w GASOS and did Pen testing, while not mitigating anything
Image
Image
2. The second major find was DARPA tracking “command and control” activities from “Russians” and “Iranians” (Questions about this attribution) There was also egress points from Dominion poll pads. A nice Segway to remote access at the Election center. Alpha Bank hoax 2.0?

Image
Image
Image
Apr 6 6 tweets 4 min read
This is super interesting. During the first few days of in person voting (10/12). All counties had to manually input the voters because enet was down (you didn't hear about this) and is a big deal in itself. A voter says he voted in person, brought in his absentee ballot and they spoiled it, and voted in person QR code. It is documented on 10/12. He emails on 10/26 saying the SOS portal hasnt counted it. If you look at the post id (an ID for ballots made in order of ballot printing/ Right column ./ red are duplicates.) A. its a duplicate post id that also is assigned to another vote. ( they say this is human error) B more importantly Its associated with later dated ballots.. all on 10/27 the day after he emails saying his vote wasn't counted. How the heck did they reconcile voters if there was no record or voter certificate as noted in the emails? It seems like they just gave him credit for another voter and changed the dates?!Image
Image
Image
Image
Look at the other odd dates as well. There may be reasonable explanation.... but this is suspect. Image
Apr 5 7 tweets 2 min read
FULTON ROGUE LAWYER STRIKE AGAIN. The Fulton Co Election Board approved Auto Sig verification. Literally in the agreement. Ralph Jones/Barron’s Lawyer went behind the boards back and removed it. The same lawyer who petitioned in front of a judge on their behalf w/o their consent Image What the heck is going on in Fulton? From a legal standpoint is this ethical? The lawyer petitioned to a judge to extend counting absentee ballots in the primary. And then included a bunch of MAY ballots (chain of custody ?)
Mar 19 4 tweets 2 min read
Serbia or not. They had virtual ems servers. The errors in code are huge. You know who approved voting machines. CISA’s Ryan Macias. You know who set up Fulton PA and AZ. Macias’s the election group. He would know all those crazy vulnerabilities and could do it different in each state. What is a “listener” And if you dont believe me. I skimmed through it. Virtual machine. ICC Access. Remote desktop while they are scanning ballots. The last half is where the craziness really starts with the errors. Its everything we have seen in each state. paper jams. optical scanning issues, qr code errors, deleted batches, overwriting batches. All the things they told us to ignore.Image
Image
Feb 25 4 tweets 3 min read
Two important tweets in thread: Fulton cant release the absentee envelopes because of personal information. Specifically Date of Birth...Look at second tweet...These are absentee envelopes. I cant find the date of birth they are referring to? Ill admit if Im wrong here. Now unless its somewhere else on these envelopes, I cant find them. There are a few different types of envelopes here which is somewhat interesting. Especially with the two yellow but dont want to make much of it. The signatures of election managers are also stamps.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Feb 14 5 tweets 3 min read
Wi-Fi:Low-Fidelity
When RussiaGate meets Election Fraud: Was DARPAs Enhanced Attribution Program (Manos) watching Dominion machines extract data from GA poll pads (in real time) and SEND TO DOMINION through Unsecure Wifi? Did SOS cover up Remote Access of poll pads using wifi?


Image
Image
Image
Image
The Coverup: Fortalice and Fulton hide remote access behind NDA. They Penetration test for GASOS /worked w PCC (SOS programmers) to "mitigate exploits." Were they just finding exploits while ensuring no sensors picked them up during Pen testing?
Image
Image
Feb 11 8 tweets 4 min read
So, there was a post about the GA Kennesaw vulnerability. Also a big deal, how often GA accidentally gives out their whole Registration Database.
1. Accidental Send out '15
2. Kennsaw all info
3. EasyVote '22
4. They send all your DMV data to ERIC/CEIR
5. Other breaches Accidental Send out of whole database is very interesting. They blame a random IT person. This is his defense. They fired him.
ajc.com/news/state--re…
Jan 20 13 tweets 4 min read
This is HUGE. Fulton Co. admits they never scanned any envelopes (they likely did and are lying) but this means that they NEVER did signature verification. Remember these counties adamant about no one looking at screen and remember deleted absentee server. No Observers
Jan 17 6 tweets 5 min read
Ryan Macias's The Elections Group helps set up Fulton/ PAs elections, yet no financials exist. PA even deleted contract from website

He lead CISA/EACs Dept approving voting machines. Is a paid CISA consultant. He is a paid to audit GA AZ. Who's paying him? Conflict of Interest?


Image
Image
Image
Image
He isn't an innocent bystanders:
A. He is a paid consultant for DHS/CISA while working on elections.
B. He was the official observer for Maricopa/Fulton. Was he being paid by Fulton while auditing?
C. He was handpicked and paid by Hobbs/AZ SOS as an expert witness multiple times


Image
Image
Image
Image