My most important audio post yet!

PLEASE LISTEN to this 7 part post.

The Biden administration is spending massive amounts of money to bring foreigners who served in our military back to the United States. But, the catch is, they were deported after committing violent or heinous crimes in the United States AFTER they finished their military service. Do you think that's right?

Get involved!
Make your voices heard!

U.S. citizens who served in our military wait in ridiculously long lines for medical care from the VA. Some of us wait years did disability ratings. They need more funding, more medical professionals, and more equipment just to keep up. But Biden is spending millions of U.S. tax payer dollars looking for deported criminals to bring them back to the U.S., AND is giving them reparations for being deported in the first place. The VA has already been ordered by the Biden administration to provide care to the millions of ILLEGAL immigrants coming across the Southern border...and now this.

Get involved! Be heard! This issue will be hitting the media soon. Be a part of the conversation now!

1/7. A quick and VERY IMPORTANT seven part thread.

All of the political talk going on in this country, all of the lies, all of the deception right now is culminating into a very significant effort to cover up EXTREMELY important facts that [THEY] don't want you to remember. One person has been telling us the truth throughout all of it...and many folks have been totally missing it.

We were seeing hints of these truths all the way back in June, 2024. In fact, there were earlier discussions about this but I'm using the NYT in this because of how widely it is read. The entire world saw this article. The NYT was telling us a full month ago in June that there was a very real probability that Joe Biden would NOT be the democrat party candidate for the 2024 election.

This was before Trump destroyed Biden in the debate. This was before the assassination attempt against Trump. This was before the covered up AF1 medical episode.

nytimes.com/article/joe-bi… 2/7. @realDonaldTrump has been calling out the democrat party leaders for months, saying that Joe Biden would not be the party's candidate, which also means that Kamala Harris would not be running as a VP candidate. But do you remember, Joe Biden had NEVER stated, at any time, that Kamala Harris would in fact be his running mate come November.

Do you remember just two weeks ago how pissed off Kamala Harris was as the party hurriedly discussed possible VP running mates for Joe Biden? Donald Trump and JD Vance pointed this out as recently as just one week ago - when they announced that JD Vance would NOT commit to wasting his time and resources in a debate against Kamala Harris until Joe Biden officially nominated her as his 2024 running mate.

Joe Biden never made that commitment! The media was presenting numerous possible choices for Biden's VP running mate. Kamala Harris was all but out of politics as the discussion grew and she knew it. Democrats knew that Harris was doing absolutely nothing for Joe Biden's chances against Trump.

The outspoken clue came from Trump and Vance when they refused to schedule debates against Kamala Harris because nobody knew who Joe Biden was going to choose for his VP running mate.

"In response to questions about the debate schedule, senior adviser to the Trump campaign Brian Hughes cited uncertainty surrounding the Democratic nominee for vice president. “We don't know who the Democrat nominee for Vice President is going to be, so we can't lock in a date before the DNC,” he stated in a statement on running mate debate, as per Newsweek."

hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-…

With so much uncertainty in the democrat party right now, please take a listen to this short, 8 part audio post about Kamala Harris and the election fraud she is currently committing. That's right! Harris is using campaign funds and resources from Joe Biden's 2024 campaign without authorization and if someone else is chosen to be the democrat party candidate, then she has unlawfully used campaign funds she was not authorized to use!

I explain it all here. Just remember, Joe Biden had never said that Harris was going to be his VP nominee for 2024. Trump and Vance made sure everybody knew about that!

Listen in and let me know your thoughts.

1/6. On this day, March 1st, 1781, exactly 243 years ago; the Articles of Confederation were instituted and the Congress of the Confederation was born. Originally adopted in 1777, the articles were finally ratified by all participating States in 1781. The United States of America "OFFICIALLY" had its first permanent rules of conduct that our nation would operate under. The Articles would later be reformed into what we now call the Constitution of the United States in 1789.

-THIS IS WHERE IT ALL BEGAN-

"To all to whom these Presents shall come, we, the undersigned Delegates of the States affixed to our Names send greeting. Whereas the Delegates of the United States of America in Congress assembled did on the fifteenth day of November in the year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy seven, and in the Second Year of the Independence of America agree to certain articles of Confederation and perpetual Union between the States of Newhampshire, Massachusetts-bay, Rhodeisland and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia in the Words following, viz.

“Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union between the States of Newhampshire, Massachusetts-bay, Rhodeisland and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.

Article I. The Stile of this confederacy shall be, “The United States of America.”

Article II. Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

Article III. The said states hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defence, the security of their Liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretence whatever.

Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from Justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states; and the people of each state shall have free ingress and regress to and from any other state, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restrictions shall not extend so far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any state, to any other State of which the Owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any state, on the property of the united states, or either of them.

If any Person guilty of, or charged with, treason, felony, or other high misdemeanor in any state, shall flee from Justice, and be found in any of the united states, he shall upon demand of the Governor or executive power of the state from which he fled, be delivered up, and removed to the state having jurisdiction of his offence.

Full faith and credit shall be given in each of these states to the records, acts and judicial proceedings of the courts and magistrates of every other state.

Article V. For the more convenient management of the general interests of the united states, delegates shall be annually appointed in such manner as the legislature of each state shall direct, to meet in Congress on the first Monday in November, in every year, with a power reserved to each state to recall its delegates, or any of them, at any time within the year, and to send others in their stead, for the remainder of the Year. 2/6. No State shall be represented in Congress by less than two, nor by more than seven Members; and no person shall be capable of being delegate for more than three years, in any term of six years; nor shall any person, being a delegate, be capable of holding any office under the united states, for which he, or another for his benefit receives any salary, fees or emolument of any kind.

Each State shall maintain its own delegates in a meeting of the states, and while they act as members of the committee of the states.

In determining questions in the united states, in Congress assembled, each state shall have one vote.

Freedom of speech and debate in Congress shall not be impeached or questioned in any Court, or place out of Congress, and the members of congress shall be protected in their persons from arrests and imprisonments, during the time of their going to and from, and attendance on congress, except for treason, felony, or breach of the peace.

Article VI. No State, without the Consent of the united States, in congress assembled, shall send any embassy to, or receive any embassy from, or enter into any conferrence, agreement, alliance, or treaty, with any King prince or state; nor shall any person holding any office of profit or trust under the united states, or any of them, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state; nor shall the united states, in congress assembled, or any of them, grant any title of nobility.

No two or more states shall enter into any treaty, confederation, or alliance whatever between them, without the consent of the united states, in congress assembled, specifying accurately the purposes for which the same is to be entered into, and how long it shall continue.

No State shall lay any imposts or duties, which may interfere with any stipulations in treaties, entered into by the united States in congress assembled, with any king, prince, or State, in pursuance of any treaties already proposed by congress, to the courts of France and Spain.

No vessels of war shall be kept up in time of peace, by any state, except such number only, as shall be deemed necessary by the united states, in congress assembled, for the defence of such state, or its trade; nor shall any body of forces be kept up, by any state, in time of peace, except such number only as, in the judgment of the united states, in congress assembled, shall be deemed requisite to garrison the forts necessary for the defence of such state; but every state shall always keep up a well regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutred, and shall provide and constantly have ready for use, in public stores, a due number of field pieces and tents, and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition, and camp equipage.

No State shall engage in any war without the consent of the united States in congress assembled, unless such State be actually invaded by enemies, or shall have received certain advice of a resolution being formed by some nation of Indians to invade such State, and the danger is so imminent as not to admit of a delay till the united states in congress assembled, can be consulted: nor shall any state grant commissions to any ships or vessels of war, nor letters of marque or reprisal, except it be after a declaration of war by the united states in congress assembled, and then only against the kingdom or State, and the subjects thereof, against which war has been so declared, and under such regulations as shall be established by the united states in congress assembled, unless such state be infested by pirates, in which case vessels of war may be fitted out for that occasion, and kept so long as the danger shall continue, or until the united states in congress assembled shall determine otherwise.

We're watching big social media accounts, several mainstream media personalities and even some law enforcement agencies posting "BREAKING NEWS" stories that are confirming things that we've been telling the world about for several years!

We were suppressed, treated terribly, publicly attacked, ridiculed, and called "dangerous liars" for telling the world these truths. We were targeted by federal propaganda, even to the point of being labeled as domestic terrorists in Congressional bills! Tens of thousands of us were permanently banned from social media sites because we dared to challenge the narrative. And now, our claims that we were so terribly mistreated for are being confirmed without any mention that we were right all along.

So, how do we handle these BREAKING NEWS stories? How do we respond?

That's the topic of today. Join me for episode #8 of my new audio series for 2024 and we'll discuss how to move forward from here.

1/7. I promise you, this thread will break open one of the biggest unknowns in this entire movement. The pursuit of Justice has never been more promising than now.

One of the biggest discoveries I've ever been a part of was the 'Ndrangheta arrests on Sunday the 7th of July 2019, reported on Monday the 8th of July 2019, in São Paolo Brazil. Many of you know this story. This was the same weekend that Jeffrey Epstein was arrested...so naturally, Epstein dominated the news cycle. After learning all I have learned, I now wonder if Epstein's arrest was actually Deep State ammunition being expended? Considering the fact that I believe I'm just about the only Anon digging continuously on this topic for the past 4.5 years, it looks like their Epstein distraction worked.

Nicola Assisi and his son Patrick were arrested in São Paolo Brazil on Sunday the 7th of July, 2019. Nicola was a MAJOR figure in the 'Ndrangheta Mafia out of Calabria, Italy. Nicola personally oversaw the majority of the Ndrangheta's cocaine trafficking to Europe and the United States. According to Forbes magazine, the Ndrangheta made more profit per year than freaking McDonalds and Duestche Bank - combined! They're by far the most successful and powerful Mafia in the world, yet most people have never heard of them. There's a reason for that.

2/7. Some estimate that 70% of all the cocaine entering Europe goes through Ndrangheta, as well as 40% of all the cocaine going into the rest of the world. Nicola had been on the run for over a decade when he was finally arrested. What I've learned since then, is Nicola's arrest was predicated by arrests of several other major Ndrangheta Mafia heads. It may very well be that those previous arrests and interrogations led to locating and arresting Nicola and his son.

What I've told you all since then is that following the arrest of Nicola Assisi, a massive amount of investigations began into the Ndrangheta cartel, adding to the already monumental investigations into their organization. What resulted is nothing short of phenomenal. With the assistance of numerous countries, including Donald Trump’s administration, Italy repurposed a telecommunications call center and built a very specialized facility for the sole purpose of arresting, trying, holding, and sentencing members of the Ndrangheta cartel. It’s an absolutely massive facility that touts military grade security.

Inside the facility are quarters for the justice officials, police officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys and guards. There’s also cells and cages to hold the suspects before and during their trials. Some of the facility is underground so that it cannot be penetrated by any type of attack. Prosecutors were issued squads of armed guards and their families were taken to secret holding areas during the court processes to keep the prosecutors from being compromised. The Italian government worked expertly to prevent kidnappings and extortion demands that would have led to black mail and threats of violence against the prosecutor's loved ones.

Over a two year period, court officials and defense attorneys from all over the world were brought into this facility and they were allowed to sit in the courtroom at desks assigned to each one of them as the individuals who had been arrested were arraigned and then tried. Over 350 members of the Ndrangheta cartel were processed through this facility. A panel of judges was assigned and special laws were cited to accommodate this Rico type court process.

1/7. I originally wrote this mega-thread over 4 years ago. It was lost when my account was banned in the purge. But, I archived much of what I wrote and I'm bringing this thread back to life now! So, let me ask you two VERY important questions:

Who has ultimate authority over the branches of our military?

What is THE military code?

@realDonaldTrump knew that removing criminal, rogue elements as a first step, was essential to free up both houses of Congress so they could pass legislation without being burdened by the likes of Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi. But, he also set out to remove bad actors from 3 letter agencies who were providing false intelligence, hiding evidence, and blockading the releases of declassified documents. So, here's one more very important question:

Who has access to everything classified?

We all know that the President is the Commander In Chief, meaning he has the ultimate power to wield the military at his discretion. The only real limitation he has, is the requirement to notify congress within 48 hours that he has deployed the military. And, if troops are placed into combat situations, they may remain there up to 90 days before there MUST be a declaration of war by Congress. Otherwise, the president is supposed to pull the troops back from foreign shores or face impeachment for violating the war powers act.

BUT, WHAT IF THOSE SOLDIERS WERE AT WAR HERE - INSIDE THE U.S. - NOT IN SOME FOREIGN COUNTRY?

You are more than welcome to peruse the pages of the Title 50 US Code section 33 to verify my summation and understand how I've come to the proposition above.



So, what about the "military code"? Is it the UCMJ - the Uniform Code of Military Justice? The UCMJ is an exhaustive, damned rule book that haunts every service member. It is typically thought to be the equivelant to State or Federal law, traditionally applying to the military and certain people who are contracted by or employed by the military and the Department of Defense.

What does "You have more than you know" and "We have it all" really mean?

I believe there's something to this that few have understood. You see, we're looking for military tribunals, hoping for military arrests of the traiterous assholes, right? Well, frankly, the Supreme Court decisions are what most people point to as precedent for the military trying civilians. BUT, what if there's something has happened that nullifies those supreme court decisions? What if something has changed?

What about the document that provides the UCMJ it's authority? Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the MCM. The MCM is the Manual for Courts-Martial. A 772 page document of "light reading".



This document is something very special. You see, it covers ALL military law, its application AND its JURISDICTION. A unique attribute of this document, is that it is often edited by the President of the United States. And guess what, pretty much every president HAS altered it at some point since 1984 when the right to alter it was granted to sitting presidents. It is governed, explained, and its contents defined by, The Joint Service Committee on Military Justice (JSC)

The JSC also makes recommendations to the president of any changes they believe should be made.

The MCM is the backbone of all the military legal codes. In fact, the other codes that Anons have thought might fall under "what is the military code" are actually all found inside the MCM, one way or another. So, what's so important about the MCM? Two simple answers:

1.The MCM defines the military's ability to enforce laws.

2.The method that the military legal structure must operate under as well as rights and privledges afforded to the accused, to victims, to witnesses and more. 2/7. So, if the DeepState presidents believed their illegal ventures may someday fall under the auspices of the MCM, we would probably find that they had altered it to relieve themselves and others of the laws and statutes contained in it that would apply to them, right? Well, if you're a legal minded person, you can see the changes obama made to it in order to do just that. In fact, he altered it 7 times during his presidency with executive orders in the following instances:

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13552
75 Fed. Reg. 54263 (Sep. 3, 2010)
President Barack H. Obama (Aug 31, 2010)

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13593
76 Fed. Reg. 78451 (Dec. 16, 2011)
President Barack H. Obama (Dec. 13, 2011)

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13643
78 Fed. Reg. 29559 (May 21, 2013)
President Barack H. Obama (May 15, 2013)

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13669
79 Fed. Reg. 34999 (June 18, 2014)
President Barack H. Obama (June 13, 2014)

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13696
80 Fed. Reg. 35783 (June 22, 2015)
President Barack H. Obama (June 17, 2015)

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13730
81 Fed. Reg. 33331 (May 26, 2016)
President Barack H. Obama (May 20, 2016)

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13740
81 Fed. Reg. 65175 (Sep. 22, 2016)
President Barack H. Obama (Sep. 16, 2016)

What gives the president the ability to make these alterations? Well, here's the preamble to each change:

"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473 of April 13, 1984, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:"

The info you see above with obama's alterations shows the Executive Order filed to make the changes, the date the changes were made, and the date the Executive Order was filed. In truth, many presidents since 1984 have changed the code several times during their tenure. As of today, obama changed it more times than any other president. He was being very sure to cover all the bases. It would take me a very long time to go through the process of showing you what each of obama's changes entailed. You're more than welcome to look at them since I've given you the exact details above.

What I really want to talk about is the fact that DJT has also changed the MCM. When I first wrote this thread in 2019, he had charged it just one time. However, his one change set a record. It was the most sweeping and vast alteration and advancement to the MCM ever produced. Trump reversed nearly every protection and exclusion that obama created.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13825
83 Fed. Reg. 9889 (registered Mar. 8, 2018). President Donald J. Trump (posted Mar. 1, 2018).

Here is the link to the Executive Order and all the changes made by Trump. Scroll down past his signature to see some of the changes.



You will see lines have been struck from the record with a line through the previous sections. You will also see underlined statements meaning they were added by Trump's changes. This too took some major time and effort to sort through.

The first section before Trump's signature is basically a plethora of statements that no persons will be charged retroactively by any new laws or rules implemented by DJT's additions and deletions. You cannot create a new law in order to charge someone with something they've already done. Now do you understand the purpose of "the pause" that we're enduring?

After the new laws were made, the players had to be allowed to break those new laws in order to be prosecuted by them. We know the federal judges and people in the DOJ aren't trustworthy to prosecute the scum in our government. Obama had basically removed any ability fot he and his criminal cohorts to be charged by military courts.

1/8. An extremely important mega thread from @Americanlll and @IQUQWEQ and I to document where so much of it began, prepare to be blown away!

[P]egasus

Somewhere out there in the internet and printed paper, all the the facts we need to take down the #DeepState have been recorded.

Reflect. "Use logic". This is a lesson of paramount importance and magnitude.

The 40+ year history of surrendering the Panama Canal to the Panamanians allowed the Chinese to take control. One of the most strategically important shipping lanes in the world is now operated by the Chinese. If you have not followed this subject yet you seriously need to. There is a TREMENDOUS amount of backstory here and if you're not familiar with it, you may not understand the strong and bountiful evidence found here.

In the early 1900's the US built the Panama Canal. It has been called one of the greatest assets to international shipping in the world. It has also been called a priceless asset to the US military because it allowed troops movements through that part of the world without having to go the additional 8,000 miles down and around the American Cape Horn, below Brazil.

In 1977 President Jimmy Carter signed a treaty that would surrender the Panama Canal to the people of Panama, however the actual surrender would not occur until December 31st, 1999. Carter's agreement stated that at ANY TIME the US could revoke the treaty Carter signed and retain complete control of the canal. Within a very short time of signing that treaty China began investing in ports along the canal including the most Eastern and most Western ports that control the canal traffic. The Chinese were also given authority by Panama to use People's Republic of China (PRC) military craft and personnel to patrol and monitor the canal which was a violation of the lonstanding treaty Panama had with the US. Still, the canal's eventual surrender still happened.

When December 31st, 1999 arrived, final surrender fell to Bill Clinton's (BC) presidency. Before then, in April of 1998, the US Army intelligence agency presented BC and his administration with evidence with confirmed reports that Chinese businessmen and the PRC were heavily involved in controlling the canal and would take complete control IF the US did in fact complete the surrendering of the canal to Panama. Clinton completely ignored the report and in early Decemeber of 1999 admitted herknew China would control the canal, even saying that China would operate the canal lawfully and respectfully.

Clinton knew China was going to take control. In addition to surrendering the canal, the numerous US military bases in Panama were closed and abandoned, causing the US's ability to respond to incidents in the region much more difficult. Isn't it ironic that today the Clinton Foundation owns or leases the ground where some of those bars were located.

There's a reason Clinton surrendered the canal to the Chinese. The billionaire Chinese/Indonesian businessmen buying up ports and running the canal were the same people who illegally donated to his governor campaigns in Arkansas and later to his presidential campaigns in 1992 an 1996.

There were NUMEROUS nefarious dealings going on behind the scenes during all of this. James Riady and the Lippo group were financing Li Ka-Shing's Hutchison Whampoa shipping lines and port purchases on the canal.
We believe the NUMBER ONE REASON Clinton wanted the Panama Canal deal to go through was to remove the US military from the region. A few years before, the Iran-Contra Affair had caused a major hiccup in world wide drug trafficking. A new shipping line needed to be freed up, away from prying eyes.

The US military was searching ships and cargo and stopping a lot of smuggling when they operated the canal. So, by letting go of the historical waterway and closing Panama's US military bases, Clinton was removing the US military's ability to actively monitor trafficking of drugs, money, people, weapons, etc. 2/8. About a decade earlier, then Vice President George H.W. Bush (GHWB) and then governor of Arkansas Bill Clinton, were implicated in one of the world's most infamous drug smuggling operations known as the Iran-Contra affair. Though they were never officially charged, there has been dozens of witnesses claiming they were behind the entire deal, using the ClA as their paramilitary protection force and using the agency's assets to transport cocaine, weapons, money and more in their trafficking scheme.

Then president Ronald Reagan (RR) was either complicit, oblivious, or maybe even scared to intervene following the attempted assassination he survived in March of 1981. However, later in his tenure, in a possible attempt to hinder the illegal smuggling schemes happening under his watch, Reagsn decided to sell weapons to Iran, and in turn, used the black operation money to arm and support Contra rebels in Nicaragua. There rebels sought to overthrow their vicious dictator and to help put an end to the massive drug running operations. In effect, this was the epitome of the Iran-Contra Affair.

Reagan beat GHWB for the republican nomination in the presidential primaries. But, once Reagan obtained the nomination, he chose GHWB as his running mate, appearing strong and unified. Upon taking office in January 1981, RR cancelled the dispersal of economic aid to Nicaragua that Carter had been sending since the late 70's. This pissed off the people who were abusing that aid to facilitate smuggling operations. Just over 2 months after he assumed his presidency with GHWB as his vice president, on March 30th, 1981 Reagan was shot in an attempted assassination plot by a man later rumored to have been working for the ClA, John Hinkley Jr. If RR had been killed, GHWB would have become the new president accoridng to the line of succession.

"As demand for cocaine grew during the 1970s and 1980s, Colombia became a major supplier to North America. The presence of United Fruit in Colombia and their extensive transportation network lent itself to drug trafficking." (3A)

But hey 40, I thought you said this was about Panama, or maybe Nicaragua? This article says Columbia was responsible for trafficking!

In fact, during our research, we have found that at least 30 countries are involved in this MAJOR, worldwide drug trafficking, money laundering, human trafficking, weapons smuggling crimainl network. That number includes all 5 countries making up Five Eyes. Not only that, at least 5 US presidential administrations, multiple presidents and dictators from South and Central America, and leaders from China, Argentina, Brazil, Honduras, and dozens of others would facilitate this drug trade BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY! The connections are so close and so consistent, the lines become completely blurred.

If you make a list of every worldwide criminal network and every criminal leader in it, you will find the same leaders are at the top of every one of those world wide criminal networks. You need to understand, THIS IS THE ESSENCE AND THE MAKE UP OF THE DEEP STATE!

Here's a list of just SOME of the people we have seen in these articles and in this research who are connected to this: George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, J.L. Hunt, Maxine Waters, John Kerry, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Osama Bin Laden, Ted Cruz, Manuel Noriega, Li Ka-Shing, Shen Juren, James Riady, Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Janet Reno, Barack Obama, Oliver North, Princess Diana, Prince Philip, Queen Elizabeth, Adnan Khashoggi, Vince Foster, Jamal Khashoggi, William Casey, prince Al-Waleed, George Soros, the Rosthchilds, Barry Seal, Robert Johnson, the Rockefellers, Ghadaffi, and many, many more. Every one of those people and families have been connected to this MASSIVE illegal network, one way or another...either driving it, facilitating it, or falling to it. Either they participated in it, or they become victims when they found out about it.

1/4. One thing we've learned from Q is that context is everything and that it should never be assumed. Of all double meanings and hidden truths...this one could be one of the biggest.

A 4 part post of screenshots on "Coming soon to a theater near you".

2/4.

1/. I am @40_Head

I was banned for seeking the TRUTH. Here's one of my original threads, the one that started Twitter's attacks against me.

Attention, to the United States Congress and more specifically to the Ethics Committee Members of the respective Houses of Congress: 2/. The United States of America stands at either the brink of chaos and failure with only demise in its future or, at the brink of return to its original greatness and better.