🚨1/Pubpeer Elizabeth Bik claims @SciGuardians submit "crappy AI-generated slop" lacking real science, yet, when trying to discredit Farshad et al. paper, her comment flags rat and mouse liver H&E images as "remarkably similar" adding "rats and mice are different animal species",

https://twitter.com/MicrobiomDigest/status/1999351453605933415

2/implying images should not match just because of species difference, WHEN IN FACT liver histopathology images are similar and visually identical in both species: uniform pink hepatocyte cords, blue nuclei, sinusoids, lobular structure, no species clues (IHC often needed).

🚨URGENT: New study from Israel, only accessible online today/pub date 15 Oct 2025, finds Pfizer vaccine mRNA detected in blood, placenta, sperm & seminal fluid of vaccinated/still detectable in 50% women >200 days last-dose indicating prolonged persistence in the body.
Surprisingly also found in blood/placenta of 3/6 unvaccinated pregnant women/exposure source "yet to be investigated".

@Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher @jathorpmfm

#placentagate

Sources:
gavinpublishers.com/assets/article…
gavinpublishers.com/journals/detai…


Regarding this inconvenient study, one might wonder why qualified researchers choose to publish findings on mRNA vaccine persistence in lesser-known journals like gavinpublishers?
Top-tier outlets, pharma-funded and biased journals, everyone knows they’d reject any “red flag” studies that challenge mRNA COVID-19 safety narratives/more likely to favor industry results.
It scares doctors and drug companies, driving the work into the shadows

🔥Konig vs Kaiser et al DNA Contamination findings war continues. Kaiser et al conducted new mRNA vaccine experiment/published paper 22 March 2025, claiming DNA impurities are withing regulatory limits & DNA measurement timing was the problem, then contradict themselves by admitting 1.8x contamination. Read how:

Methods/findings:

"We applied the same Qubit fluorometric quantification method..."
"technologies we applied are well-known for over 50 years for isolation of DNA and RNA from natural lipid nanoparticles, namely cells"

"We repeated the measurements after 35 and 45 mins (after having added the Triton-X-100 solution) and observed higher DNA concentrations when compared to the directly analysed aliquot (Fig. 1A)."

"The circumstance that experiment duration has a significant impact on DNA quantification is a first indicator that sample preparation biases might lead to the measurement of false and overreaching DNA concentrations"

Conclusion:

"combination of our data obtained by Qubit fluorometric quantitation and LC-MS substantiate that concentrations of both DNA impurities and vaccine mRNA are consistent with the nucleic acids levels approved by regulatory authorities."

Admission of 1.8x DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccine Vials:

"While we do not see evidence for DNA content 534-fold higher than allowed by the regulatory authorities, we see a DNA content below and in some analyses 1.8-fold above the accepted quantities. We cannot explain this discrepancy in all certainty and we want to point out that our data are the result of experiments...Thus an over-quantification cannot be fully excluded at this stage."

There you have it

@Kevin_McKernan

Source:
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…


I can only imagine how much they had to bite their own hands before they were forced to admit that mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA above normal limits, even though they found contamination in "a few vials", shooting themselves in the foot as this corroborates that the manufacturing quality process is Russian roulette.

So,@anders_hviid,a little mole exposes your recent misleading study

-Your colleague Wohlfahrt's co-author in another Danish study using same Danish data
-They show it misclassifies vaccinated as unvaccinated
-You're deliberately misleading Danish people
x.com/anders_hviid/s… x.com/anders_hviid/s…


Sources:
@anders_hviid study and colleague Jan Wohlfahrt as co-author using Danish Data Sources:

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

Study where Jan Wohlfahrt's also co-author using same Danish Data Sources & showing how same data misclassifies vaccination status

thelancet.com/journals/lanin…

1\ So, people thought mRNA Vaccines DNA contamination's the only thing to worry?

Remember vaccinated showing magnets sticking in their shoulders?

What did Experts™ & @DrPaulOffit claimed?

Let's just recall their claims, shall we? 2\ What did independent reporters found in the streets?

Let's recall what they found:

There you go, U.S. scientists from Genetech join the team of growing scientists finding impurities on mRNA vaccines, with an exception:

They anonymize mRNA manufacturers as A, B, C to protect their identities, so..

I'm just dropping more research to add to the collection..

Enjoy!

Source:
pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac…

The possible relationship with blood cancers and COVID-19 vaccines and the proven scientific mechanisms that may explain it... Better than anyone, scientists who work on immunology/pathology can explain it and show how the rise in cancers since 2021 are now at 9-sigma... And last but not the least, let's just add the statistical significance for the rise in cancers after the COVID-19 vaccines rollout to @drcole12 's alarming findings. Courtesy of @EthicalSkeptic aka the Random Dude out there. This mole sends greetings...

https://x.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1582885682091290624