The Catholic Association which accepts the terms of Canon 332 §2 as Canon 17 requires! - Click 👇 to donate! * #PPBXVI 👉 https://t.co/orKK5JPn4Z * Follow to join!
6 subscribers
May 19, 2020 • 31 tweets • 5 min read
1/ Bl. Emmerich, Heavenly Patron of all in the discernment of the true Pope, was born into a poor family of farmers in Germany, on the Feast of the Nativity of Our Lady, in the year of 1774, at Flamschen, at Coesfeld, a small farming town in Westphalia, in the Diocese of Münster
2/ As a child she worked in the fields helping her parents and 9 brothers and sisters. As she grew, she went to work for a three year stint at a larger farm to earn money for her family. She then became a seamstress, for the same reasons. She had very little education, ....
Apr 20, 2020 • 19 tweets • 4 min read
1/ Le PROFEZIE di B. Anna-Caterina EMMERICH
13 maggio 1820: “Ho visto il rapporto tra i due Papi. Ho visto quanto sarebbero state dolorose le conseguenze di questa falsa chiesa. L’ho vista aumentare di dimensioni; eretici di ogni tipo sono arrivati in città (di Roma)....
2/ Il clero locale diventava tiepido, e io vedevo una grande oscurità. Poi, la visione sembrava estendersi da ogni lato. Intere comunità cattoliche venivano oppresse, molestate, confinate e private della loro libertà. Ho visto molte chiese chiudere, ...
Apr 2, 2020 • 13 tweets • 3 min read
1/ Bl. Catherine Emmerich was given to know much about the future of the Catholic Church, nearly 200 years ago. She was given to see the time of two popes, and how one would lead the Church into apostasy, the other would be isolated and paralyzed by inaction.
2/ As a remedy, Our Lady revealed to her that Catholics should join together to pray a special prayer at Midnight, Rome Time. It is presently midnight here at Rome, so please read these prophecies of Bl. Emmerich, approved by the Church, and say the prayers Our Lady asked for.
Jan 29, 2020 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
chiesaromana.info/index.php/2020…1/ "La Madonna ha fatto una richiesta semplice: Venite insieme all’esterno della sua Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore e pregate con entrambe le braccia tese a forma di croce, come Suo Figlio ha pregato per noi sulla sua Croce, e fate questo per lo spazio di almeno 3 Pater Noster.
Jan 14, 2020 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
The Foundation of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome. The Patrician's Dream
The following is a point-by-point simplified summary of the argument posted in this article, for the benefit of anyone who wants to share it fromrome.wordpress.com/2020/01/12/ben…
1 There are a host of details about Benedict’s renunciation which have been overlooked by everyone, but which all point to the same conclusion, namely Benedict’s disgust with the College of Cardinals, not just as men, but as an institution.
Jan 11, 2020 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
1/ The following citations are from "The Life and Revelations of Anne Catherine Emmerich: Book 2" by Very Rev. Carl E. Schmöger
"“I know not now how I went to Rome last night, but I found myself near the church of St. Mary-Major...
2/ Around it I saw crowds of poor, pious souls, in great distress and anxiety on account of the Pope’s disappearance and the agitation and alarming reports throughout the city. Led by one common impulse, they had come to invoke the Mother of God....
Dec 19, 2019 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
1. With the latest news coming from the Vatican, many of the faithful may be on the verge of leaving the Faith, joining the Orthodox or the sedes, or giving in to despair altogether.
Don't. Bergoglio is not the Pope, and never has been.
novenanews.com/pontifical-bib…2. "the novelty .... the Commission also recognises that there are
dissenting voices from Church teaching that claim a recognition of
“homosexuality and homosexual unions as a legitimate and worthy expression of
the human being”, just the same as for... heterosexual unions."
Dec 18, 2019 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
Since Feb 2013 the Church has been listening to hearsay (on the basis of a tweet) instead of Her own Canon Law in establishing the truth about Benedict's resignation. fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/11/18/mee…2. In this regard, consider the admissions made by the Secretary of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts (Mons. Juan Ignacio Arrieta ) to Br Alexis Bugnolo:
The following citations are from the "From Rome" blog
Dec 16, 2019 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
In chapter 32 of his book "Infiltration" Dr @TaylorRMarshall says the following:
"The ministerium of the papacy is one and the same with the munus of the papacy." 2. This claim by Dr. Marshall is patently false, for not only does caonon law clearly distinguish munus from ministerium (see canons 41 and 145.1) but philosophically BEING (holder of an office) cannot be equated with DOING (carrying out a ministry)
Several months after the falsified Corriere "interview" in which Pope Benedict XVI was falsely reported to have said "The pope is one, it is Francis", this lie is STILL doing the rounds on Catholic social media sites in discussions about the invalid resignation.
Once again....1/
2/ here are the links which explicitly refute this falsehood.
DEAR CATHOLICS -- Do not repeat the BAD example of 60 years, when instead of fighting to preserve the FAITH you were counsels either to submit to error or hide away in private chapels. It is your Baptismal Duty to speak with Bishops in your part of the world against Apostasy!
The desire only to save yourselves and not Christ's Church is a form of SCHISM with Jesus, because He regards His Church as His Mystical Body. Just as you cannot remain His friend without loving the Whole of HIM, so you cannot remain faithful to HIM without saving HIS Church.
Oct 11, 2019 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Canon Law clearly demonstrates that POPE Benedict's renunciation of ministry cannot be sustained as a renunciation of munus, because in canon 40 it is clearly said that the munus is that which is executed in an administrative act, and in canon 41 the execution is called ministry!
Hence Cardinal Sodano, as Dean of the College of Cardinals, violated canon 41 in calling a Conclave in Feb 2012, because both canons 40 and 41 make it quite clear that Benedict's renunciation was invalid to effect a loss of munus for renouncing the ministerium, as per canon 188.
Oct 10, 2019 • 10 tweets • 5 min read
@folcmar It is just as illogical to say that phrases are the proof that Jesus is not God, as I am. Italian requires Esse before sono to make it read as you wish. Without the Esse and from the testimony of Scalfar who is an atheist, it is clear to any Italian that he is playing a word game
@folcmar And as it is believable that Scalfari not only records the words correctly but makes a citation without using a referential pronoun such as Esse (these phrases), the passage can be read both ways. That is an Italian way of sticking you in the ribs and winking the eye.
Oct 6, 2019 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
The False and Erroneous rationality of Bergoglians:
1) St Gallen Mafia tells us B16 resigned, so this now is the unquestionable truth which can never be denied or questioned 2) Therefore the Church teaches B16 resgined 3) Therefore opinion that he die not resign has no basis
4) Therefore, when B16 who is currently under guard by the Ecclesiastical mafia which threatened him with assasination before Feb 11, 2013 says that he validly resigned, we must understand this metaphorically to mean that a resignation of ministry effects loss of papal office
Oct 5, 2019 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Why is Bergoglio excommunicated immediately in virtue of canon 1364 for the Apostasy in the Vatican Garden, but for his heresies would have to be tried in court?
But does not canon 1364 apply to both heresy and apostasy?
Yes it does, but the discernment of each sin as a canonical crime differs, because 1 is principally in exterior acts, the other is in the intellect. Neither require a sentence, but heresy requires investigation.
Oct 5, 2019 • 16 tweets • 3 min read
ON ACCOUNT OF THE PAGAN RITUAL PARTICIPATED IN AND PROMOTED AND AUTHORIZED BY BERGOGLIO IN THE VATICAN GARDEN ON FRIDAY, All Catholics are GRAVELY obliged TO INSIST that ALL PRIESTS STOP NAMING BERGOLGIO IN THE CANON OF THE MASS, and refuse all such Masses until he is not named!
No priest can feign ignorance, that a man who has committed such a sin, be named in the Canon of the Mass. To name him would be AN ACT OF SACRILEGE against the Divine Majesty! No Catholic can tolerate such a Sacrilege. It's not excusable on the grounds of ignorance.
Sep 28, 2019 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
CLERGY MUST RECOGNIZE that when the Apostolic See is impeded by a sede vacante or pope paralyzed by madness or substantial fear, they have ever right to refuse heretics as their Bishop and publicly move to have the Clergy excommunicate them and elect another to be their Bishop.
This is morally licit and canonical, on account of what is said in the last canon of the 1983 code: the Highest Law is the salvation of souls!
Sep 27, 2019 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
Catholics must beware of journalists on principle. They r trained to twist words so as to advance the agenda of marxism. They do it to such a degree, that as soon as you read any sentence the write, you are being fed lies. The claimed renunciation of Benedict is a classic example
First take a look at the very first tweet which framed the renunciation as a resignation
A: Non-think is a cultic practice whereby those who are initiates or who want to be initiated agree by the force of will NOT TO THINK about certain things, questions, problems or statements or actions which otherwise would expose their group as cult of lies
Q. Why is non think important in criminal or cultic groups?
A. It enables group cohesion and conspiracy for a common purpose, especially to deceive members, recruits and the public.
Sep 15, 2019 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
To understand how EVIL it is to reject canon 332.2, then understand that it is born from the same spirit which REJECTS FATIMA, because OUR LADY foretold 'a bishop in white' whom 'we thought was the pope', but was not the pope! to warn all Bergoglio followers.
That these words apply to them is seen from this, that they cannot apply to Benedict, because after Feb 2013 nearly no Catholics thought he was the pope. So who is this bishop i white which Catholics thought was the pope. It must be Bergoglio, there is no other!