@GVdFrnRWbN18944 Look at the Alphavirus nsp1-nsp4 vesicle. Just some simple changed, like with more nsp1-nsp4, less membrane curvature, and you are talking about the very beginning of a Totivirus/Partitivitus. The surface would be decorated with Spike,

@GVdFrnRWbN18944 which loves positive curvature space. Simple selection early on would rapidly drive nsp1 evolution where more of the nsp1-nsp4 complex would tile the vesicles, which already have the tendency to enter exosomes as Alphavirus replication occur on the inside of Endosomes.

"At this stage, the nearest relatives to SARS-CoV-2 are found in Yunnan and Laos. The only known link to Wuhan is the Wuhan Institute of Virology sampled both locations and have refused to share their SrCVs with WHO or the NIH." https://t.co/HO1ipQdFwXthebulletin.org/2022/08/nih-to…
And it physically can’t exist in the wildlife trade because https://t.co/Yfzh8Qbeep if that was the case it would have caused an initial outbreak lineage in Guangdong as well. https://t.co/y1RXx1TeIV this is consistent with no relatives found in Chinesearchive.md/e3615
archive.md/vWjZl
archive.md/iw1Pz

Sorry, but raccoon dogs were still entirely non-susceptible, and there is no evidence that any of the mammals shed the virus in those Q* samples other than Homo Sapiens.

Response to that vanityfair article.archive.md/8JhAb there is neither evidence of an infected animal in these “wildlife stalls” nor there is any evidence that raccoon dogs can be infected. https://t.co/sqHRpnQp2b https://t.co/GjvVRvppA6archive.md/dx2EM
archive.md/NMerN

Unfortunately neither civets nor bamboo rats have any evidence at all for their natural susceptibility to infection (or even experimental susceptibility), and none of the civets, mustelids or bamboo rats were in positive correlation again regardless of slice





In fact, no experimental evidence at all regarding their susceptibility, even in parts, exists for bamboo rats. And as for civets—the ACE2 is non-binding.

https://t.co/osO8xutbYD https://t.co/cD8wXSRQUk there is neither evidence of an infected animal in these “wildlife stalls” nor https://t.co/DV1jlqeCLl https://t.co/qrgnbyMiLE https://t.co/4CME3Cv0CW there is any evidence that raccoon dogs can be infected.archive.md/LJzSO
archive.md/T2u0S
archive.md/JSQvc
archive.md/4rVph
archive.md/yyX0Z
archive.md/DChUL RNA stability: Fresh PPE> New bangladesh banknotes > Old bangladesh banknotes. https://t.co/6frewsZmjs https://t.co/xtEPpsRlDw from toilets>high touch surfaces in train stations. https://t.co/2wB6rRukr2 High touch=low stability.
https://t.co/WbSGe4iQ7Ssciencedirect.com/science/articl…
nature.com/articles/s4159…
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
imperial.ac.uk/news/213133/im…
archive.md/8JhAb

Only samplers will buy the overpriced “live raccoon dogs” because only they have the specific need of taking A amount of animal X ad market Y for sampling.archive.md/QkFbk Inside the mystical “raccoon dog stall” itself, only Homo Sapiens was in consistent positive correlation with the 10 samples taken.archive.md/n9o0f

https://t.co/lQg3fcqiEj https://t.co/Vn6ih4knLC https://t.co/tbTfdIlNhM https://t.co/9dDtC9S498 https://t.co/hmY6eXF2I1 But here is the problem. When you enter that one stall, it say Homo Sapiens the only species in positive correlation.archive.md/n9o0f
archive.md/vL6U4
archive.md/7doR8
archive.md/0A24q
archive.md/2sAST
archive.md/JSQvc https://t.co/ZA2I6nZLu5 Everything from that stall came from contamination and cross contamination by being close to the toilets. The freezer is contaminated on the sample tube and false positive. https://t.co/HfEmpiZ6TZ https://t.co/MjyiCD633larchive.md/Ttn5P
archive.md/csYBM
archive.md/LJzSO
archive.md/4cCHG

Now, this is what even your basis of arguments claimed in private.

https://twitter.com/Biorealism/status/1679448024052023296

We have found direct evidence of lab leak. SARS-CoV-2 direct ancestor and all earliest lineages have been found in a lab, and far before any of the market samples were sequenced. This sample contained no DNA from either wild animals or Wuhan residents,

https://t.co/5ME1UvIf3P
Again, This is Jiangxia residence of Accountant Chen. And even China confirm that he was sick with SARS-CoV-2 infection in 08/12/2019. Jiangxia 1st Renmin hospital. Congratulations on China scoring an own goal. https://t.co/xr2i9IPA96researchgate.net/publication/35…
researchgate.net/publication/37…






He lived in Shidong right next to the WIV and went to an RT-mart. His residence was forcibly moved into Jianghan like one third of all early Dec19-Jan20 cases in Chinese official reports.

It is not just that raccoon dogs or bamboo rats failed to correlate positively within all Jan12 samples or positive Jan12 samples, if you actually go to W6-29-33 itself and run the correlation analysis, all species failed in properly positively correlating with the SARS-CoV-2





Raccoon dogs were never found to be naturally infected by any strain of SARS-CoV-2, or experimentally susceptible to D614 infection. the Q* samples had in them were contamination and cross-contamination. https://t.co/K1igPOInss https://t.co/LI547PwifHarchive.md/yyX0ZAll
archive.md/YGDiK
archive.md/4cCHG

https://t.co/unWwITNcGF
There is not only zero evidence of natural infections of raccoon dogs anywhere in the world despite surveillance in the pandemic era, the HSM’s supplier for raccoon dogs have been traced and all negative. https://t.co/5jSqKHqxjkmedrxiv.org/content/10.110…
academic.oup.com/ve/article/8/1…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35298912/ Freuling is fraudulent.
journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…

Again, the primary issuse against raccoon dogs is that raccoon dogs are never found to be https://t.co/qrgnbyMiLE infected naturally anywhere in the world.
All correlation negative.
https://t.co/zBEocsoPNc
https://t.co/BRu050U4G3 https://t.co/qkO4kKi6b8archive.md/4rVph
archive.md/yyX0Z
archive.md/0A24q
archive.md/bzeP1
archive.md/Ttn5P
And it physically can’t exist in the wildlife trade because https://t.co/Yfzh8Qbeep if that was the case it would have caused an initial outbreak lineage in Guangdong as well. https://t.co/ip04IYLg9h this is consistent with no relatives found in Chinesearchive.md/e3615
archive.md/vWjZl
archive.md/iw1Pz

If the same kind of discrepancy between December 2019 and January 2020 “data”—that somehow happened in a single day—existed both in the spatial and in the temporal sequence, then there is a very serious issue with the cooked up China WHO “data”.





“The “release time” of Weibo help information was mainly from February 3rd to February 12th”—it mean that the data was accumulating before and it was not specifying onset time of disease or onset time of help. And importantly that time the WIV was not yet suspicious.

Again, the primary confounding factor is the toilets (main entrance to the market). They bleached it before sampling to cover it up. Gao’s only cover-up effort. In both Jan01 and Jan20, the stall with most positives out of all is closest to the toilets. https://t.co/oyMBC1ySn2archive.md/DChUL






"Again, is “stall closest to the toilets” a major confounding factor in that “pattern”? All of it is sampler-linked contamination. https://t.co/1kLHcutHx9 https://t.co/03W5GISZ9V https://t.co/LI547PwifH"archive.md/gvHfw
archive.md/FskYn
archive.md/LJzSO
archive.md/4cCHG

Also, the CDS alignments to raccoon dogs (31/4622) were less than 1/100 the total contig alignments, indicating that it is merely coincidental CDS hits from decades-old gDNA and not fresh RNA.
archive.md/0O2TN The most catastrophic issue, however, is that there is exactly zero naturally infected raccoon dog found anywhere in the world. Exactly zero.archive.md/4rVph

This is simply wrong. The gender-segregated toilets are not aerosol-segregated. They are connected through the top. SARS-CoV-2 cases are most severe among men. And even the market cases are not 100% ascertainment. Less than 25% ascertainment and must be moderate or Severe. Mild to moderate including the most common flu-like symptoms even in naive individuals, are not ascertained. https://t.co/DV1jlqeCLl https://t.co/ip04IYLg9h https://t.co/4CME3Cv0CWarchive.md/yyX0Z
archive.md/4rVph
archive.md/iw1Pz
archive.md/DChUL

No evidence supports the origin of positive samples in the market, except from the toilets and the samplers. Homo Sapiens is the sole species found consistently and positively correlated in all samples.
https://t.co/TQ8OsncSAcarchive.md/GvRcD






https://t.co/F5Dy3afxEq Can we truly consider the SARS-CoV-2 reads in stall W6-29-33 as being "carried and shed by an animal"? It appears unlikely...
https://t.co/GmtN3Xr0iV https://t.co/OqCDbStReharchive.md/HlJ9o
archive.md/2sAST
archive.md/gkquN

Unfortunately, raccoon dogs were still entirely non-susceptible, and there were zero evidence that any of the mammals were responsible for shedding the virus in those Q* samples than Homo Sapiens. archive.md/8JhAb Oh. On that “market coincidence”? They moved most of the cases out of Wuchang and Jiangxia and onto the market itself to manufacture that “coincidence”.zenodo.org/record/7917332

] I should've been more direct 2 months ago when I 1st put this on Zenodo. If the overall official CCP data differs by net ~10,000 cases [20%], why would anyone trust the 174 early cases w/no supporting data?@WashburneAlex@quay_dr@chrismartenson https://t.co/arhJVBzE3Izenodo.org/record/7917332…
[2] The aggregated🇨🇳 epid. data shows a net 20% shift of ALL cases towards the WIV side of the mile-wide Yangtze Compared to the WHO report What's more likely: A) 1 CCP source is manipulated B) 38 peer-reviewed cohort studies by Wuhan doctors conspired to make

You know what is with the antibody tests? “Found nothing”? Nope.
Antibody tests were finding widespread evidence of pre-Huanan circulation that they have to dismiss them whenever results show up.daoyu15.substack.com/p/the-dog-that…
Just more and more. November sickness with April positive antibody tests were notably found in the U.S.daoyu15.substack.com/p/it-looks-lik…

Ben HU: “I never worked with Live SARS-like coronaviruses. Grant notice: “Pathogenicity of two new bat SARS-related coronaviruses to transgenic mice expressing human ACE2”. HU: “test in March 2020!”. https://t.co/TGlpbcY5tu Shi: Apr-Jul 2020. https://t.co/DAWtF5yg9Nresearchgate.net/publication/35…
archive.md/vSbgD






Shi’s “test”? You mean that “test” which the China WHO report used to deny positivity in 67 members of a community with 4% prevalence? https://t.co/DItypkOafFresearchgate.net/publication/37…