Help me out here. Are the assumptions of “Horseshoe Theory” and the “Political Compass” just Dualism applied to politics?

They both seem to assume that too much of one side is bad/destructive, and only a balance of the 2 sides is good

This assumption leads to false framing
If Horseshoe Theory and the Political Compass are based on Dualism, this would explain why they don’t have a paradigm for mapping “right and wrong” and also why they assume a centrist (or “balanced”) position is the best

Everyone horrified by the entire "Trans" cult (see WPATH, John Money, etc)

Should be just as wary of "Trans Humanism"

Both "Trans" movements come from the same source of Evolutionary Eugenics. One is s*xu@l, the other is technological. Both attempt to conform reality to theorywhatistranshumanism.org
The WPATH files exposed many of the practices of human experimentation used by the Transgender movement

environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath…

PSA 🧵
Liberation Theology is not Christian. It is a Socialist perversion of Christianity that seeks never-ending revolution. You can dismiss every Liberation Theologian as a pagan

"additional types of liberation theology which are popular today:
- India’s Dalit liberation theology
- James Cone’s black liberation theology
- Rosemary Radford Ruether’s feminist theology
- Marcella Althaus-Reid’s queer theology
Each of these takes its liberation of an oppressed group as the first principle and then builds its theology around it."

For all of the big brains out there that believe "National Socialists" are not "real" Socialists, please pay attention
- National Socialists claimed to be Socialists
- National Socialists implemented Socialist policies

A 🧵 The National Socialists did not disagree with Socialism. They just believed they were "better Socialists than those other Socialists"

Imagine, if you will, rival gangs competing for absolute control over the Revolution (this is why rival factions of Socialism fight each other)