The book I'm reading at the moment, Deborah Tuerkheimer's 'Credible', analyses what happens when women allege rape through the lens of the concept of credibility. /1 Tuerkheimer says women go into the process with a credibility deficit, i.e. they are going to encounter a world of officialdom and social/cultural reactions that assumes she lacks credibility, that actively looks for reasons to discount her story. /2

From Tuerkheimer's 'Credible'. One of the many ways reactionaries live in a fantasy world is their belief that men are at big risk from false rape claims. The opposite is true. Police effectively give US men a licence to rape by discounting huge numbers of cases from the start. It is routine in America for police to reject 30-40% of reported rapes as unfounded, i.e. false. In places it is more like two thirds, or higher. Social scientists estimate rates of false rape reporting at between 2-5%. Cops are predisposed to disbelieve women.

This whole dismay on the part of big capitalists about home working is actually dismay about not being able to squeeze surplus value out of workers, a crucial part of which is controlling the workers' time. But it's their own system to blame. They've squeezed labour out of production - at least in the Western service / admin economy - to the point that they can barely ever meet the profit rates they need.